Jump to content


WCHA Regular Season Home Stretch


54 replies to this topic

#1 jimdahl

  • Moderators
  • 4006 posts

Posted 17 February 2011 - 01:20 PM

Here's what still seems possible to me (it's been years since I've tried doing this, so point out any mistakes):
TeamCurrent PointsConference Series RemainingPossible Final Rankings
UND 32 3 1st-6th
  • Has secured home ice in WCHA playoffs
  • Can clinch T-5th with 1 point this weekend
  • Can clinch 5th with 2 points this weekend
  • Can clinch T-4th with 4 points this weekend
Denver 31 3 1st-6th
  • Has secured home ice in WCHA playoffs
  • Can clinch T-5th with 2 points this weekend
  • Can clinch 5th with 3 points this weekend
UMD 30 3 1st-7th
  • Can clinch 6th with 1 point this weekend
  • Can clinch T-5th with 3 points this weekend
  • Can clinch 5th with 4 points this weekend
Nebraska-Omaha 30 3 1st-7th
  • Can clinch 6th with 1 point this weekend
  • Can clinch T-5th with 3 points this weekend
  • Can clinch 5th with 4 points this weekend
UW 24 3 1st-11th
  • Can clinch 10th with 1 point this weekend
  • Can clinch 9th with 3 points this weekend
  • Can clinch T-8th with 4 points this weekend
  • Can no longer finish 1st with fewer than 2 points this weekend
  • Can no longer finish T-1st with fewer than 1 point this weekend
CC 22 3 1st-11th
  • Can clinch 10th with 3 points this weekend
  • Can clinch 9th with 4 points this weekend
  • Can no longer finish 1st with fewer than 4 points this weekend
  • Can no longer finish T-1st with fewer than 3 points this weekend
  • Can no longer finish T-2nd with fewer than 2 points this weekend
  • Can no longer finish T-3rd with fewer than 1 point this weekend
UMN 21 3 T1st-11th
  • Can clinch 10th with 4 points this weekend
  • Can no longer finish T-1st with fewer than 4 points this weekend
  • Can no longer finish T-2nd with fewer than 3 points this weekend
  • Can no longer finish T-3rd with fewer than 2 points this weekend
  • Can no longer finish T-4th with fewer than 1 point this weekend
AA 20 2 5th-11th
  • Can no longer finish 5th with fewer than 2 points this weekend
  • Can no longer finish T-5th with fewer than 1 point this weekend
SCSU 19 3 T3rd-11th
  • Can no longer finish T-3rd with fewer than 4 points this weekend
  • Can no longer finish T-4th with fewer than 3 points this weekend
Mankato 18 2 5th-11th
  • Can no longer finish 5th with fewer than 4 points this weekend
  • Can no longer finish T-5th with fewer than 3 points this weekend
  • Can no longer finish 6th with fewer than 2 points this weekend
  • Can no longer finish T-6th with fewer than 1 point this weekend
Bemidji State 17 3 5th-11th
  • Can no longer finish 5th with fewer than 2 points this weekend
  • Can no longer finish 6th with fewer than 1 point this weekend
MTech 4 3 12th-12th
  • Can no longer earn home ice in WCHA playoffs


#2 jimdahl

  • Moderators
  • 4006 posts

Posted 17 February 2011 - 01:38 PM

As to what's actually likely, using the

What-If Calculator

If I give UND two sweeps and a split, the Sioux end with 42. With a sweep and two splits, 40.

Only Denver, Duluth, and UNO would then be within striking distance. BUT, UNO plays Denver and UMD, so there have to be some losses there. It's pretty easy to come up with a three-way tie at the top, (e.g. a scenario like this):

UND 28 40
UMD 28 40
Nebraska-Omaha 28 40
Denver 28 39
UW 28 32
CC 28 28

#3 Upper Deck

  • Members
  • 983 posts

Posted 17 February 2011 - 02:31 PM

View Postjimdahl, on 17 February 2011 - 01:38 PM, said:

As to what's actually likely, using the

What-If Calculator

If I give UND two sweeps and a split, the Sioux end with 42. With a sweep and two splits, 40.

Only Denver, Duluth, and UNO would then be within striking distance. BUT, UNO plays Denver and UMD, so there have to be some losses there. It's pretty easy to come up with a three-way tie at the top, (e.g. a scenario like this):

UND 28 40
UMD 28 40
Nebraska-Omaha 28 40
Denver 28 39
UW 28 32
CC 28 28
How are tie-breakers determined?

#4 GoalieMask

  • Members
  • 193 posts

Posted 17 February 2011 - 02:36 PM

View PostUpper Deck, on 17 February 2011 - 02:31 PM, said:

How are tie-breakers determined?

That's my question too. I believe there would be a "shared conference champion" like they did with Big 10 Football this year. But the question is, who would get the #1 seed (and the luxury of playing Michigan Tech in the 1st round). Who gets the MacNaughton Cup at season's end?

I think this has happened before. Denver and CC tied and it might have been 1997 (? forgive me if I'm wrong here) when the Sioux and Gophers were co-champs.

Might be a good question for Brad Schlossman.

#5 Big A HG

  • Members
  • 4307 posts

Posted 17 February 2011 - 02:41 PM

I'm almost positive everyone gets credit as Conference Champion in the event of a tie.

#6 LeftyZL

  • Members
  • 1085 posts

Posted 17 February 2011 - 02:57 PM

View PostUpper Deck, on 17 February 2011 - 02:31 PM, said:

How are tie-breakers determined?


a) If two or more teams are tied, head-to-head competition during the regular (conference) season will be used to break the
tie.
b) If two or more teams are still tied after (a), the highest seed will go to the team with the most WCHA (conference) wins during
the regular season.
c) If two or more teams played a four-game series during the regular season and the teams have the same win-loss records for
those series and the same number of WCHA wins, the team having the least number of goals scored against it in the four-game series
shall have the higher rank. If two or more teams played a two-game series during the regular season procede to tie-breaker d).
d) If two or more teams are still tied after applying the provisions of (a), (b) and ©, the team having the greatest ‘winning margin’
during the regular season will have the higher rank. Winning margin = WCHA goals for during the regular season minus WCHA goals
against.

#7 Big A HG

  • Members
  • 4307 posts

Posted 17 February 2011 - 03:12 PM

To be honest, if the Sioux don't win the MacNaughton this year, it will be a bit disappointing. We have, hands down, the most talented team in the WCHA...even the country. Denver has over-achieved, but are still pretty good, so to lose to them would be a bit shocking. Duluth is a real good team, so losing to them wouldn't be as painful, but we are still the better team.

We just have to take care of business.

#8 Blackheart

  • Members
  • 2437 posts

Posted 17 February 2011 - 03:26 PM

View PostGoalieMask, on 17 February 2011 - 02:36 PM, said:

That's my question too. I believe there would be a "shared conference champion" like they did with Big 10 Football this year. But the question is, who would get the #1 seed (and the luxury of playing Michigan Tech in the 1st round). Who gets the MacNaughton Cup at season's end?

I think this has happened before. Denver and CC tied and it might have been 1997 (? forgive me if I'm wrong here) when the Sioux and Gophers were co-champs.

Might be a good question for Brad Schlossman.

I know that I have read on here before (Sicatoka?) about the Sioux and Gofers tying for the league in 1997 and it came down to the third tie-breaker (goals against between the two teams). The Sioux won the goals against by 1 (I believe) and got the higher seed for the WCHA home playoffs. The Sioux end up meeting the Gofers in the Final 5 title game as the higher seed and accordingly got the last line change. The Sioux won that game on a great play be Peter Armbrust coming off the bench in OT and picking up a deflected shot and putting it past Steve DeBus. As a result, the Sioux got a higher seed in the NCAA's and had to win only 1 game to get to the Frozen Four (beat Cornell 4-2). Minnesota ended up playing Michigan St (Gofs win) and then top seeded Michigan (Gofs lost) in Grand Rapids. So getting that higher seed in the WCHA definitely ended up being an advantage for the NCAAs. I apologize if I didn't capture all the details but it was14 years ago... :)

#9 Runninwiththedogs

  • Members
  • 2199 posts

Posted 17 February 2011 - 03:51 PM

View PostBig A HG, on 17 February 2011 - 03:12 PM, said:

To be honest, if the Sioux don't win the MacNaughton this year, it will be a bit disappointing. We have, hands down, the most talented team in the WCHA...even the country. Denver has over-achieved, but are still pretty good, so to lose to them would be a bit shocking. Duluth is a real good team, so losing to them wouldn't be as painful, but we are still the better team.

We just have to take care of business.

I wouldn't worry about Duluth. Blah. I'm very depressed about the team right now. tUMD threw in the towel and now I'm like praying for 3rd place.

#10 dagies

  • Moderators
  • 8214 posts

Posted 17 February 2011 - 04:14 PM

View PostBig A HG, on 17 February 2011 - 03:12 PM, said:

To be honest, if the Sioux don't win the MacNaughton this year, it will be a bit disappointing. We have, hands down, the most talented team in the WCHA...even the country. Denver has over-achieved, but are still pretty good, so to lose to them would be a bit shocking. Duluth is a real good team, so losing to them wouldn't be as painful, but we are still the better team.

We just have to take care of business.
As things shape up right now I agree with you. The Sioux have their destiny in their own hands and an easier on paper schedule than their rivals for the top spot.

#11 mikejm

  • Members
  • 2108 posts

Posted 17 February 2011 - 04:35 PM

View Postdagies, on 17 February 2011 - 04:14 PM, said:

...The Sioux have their destiny in their own hands and an easier on paper schedule than their rivals for the top spot.
UND has one tough series left; Bemidji and Tech are 11th and 12th in the league for crying out loud.
Heck, Jan State is 9th.

There shouldn't be any question of the Sioux winning the league.

#12 Goon

  • Members
  • 20778 posts

Posted 17 February 2011 - 04:39 PM

View PostRunninwiththedogs, on 17 February 2011 - 03:51 PM, said:

I wouldn't worry about Duluth. Blah. I'm very depressed about the team right now. tUMD threw in the towel and now I'm like praying for 3rd place.

You my friend are sandbagging... :lol:

#13 Runninwiththedogs

  • Members
  • 2199 posts

Posted 17 February 2011 - 05:50 PM

View PostGoon, on 17 February 2011 - 04:39 PM, said:

You my friend are sandbagging... :lol:

Meh, you'd feel the same way I did if your team had been freaking blown out by St. Cloud.

#14 jimdahl

  • Moderators
  • 4006 posts

Posted 17 February 2011 - 08:42 PM

View PostRunninwiththedogs, on 17 February 2011 - 05:50 PM, said:

Meh, you'd feel the same way I did if your team had been freaking blown out by St. Cloud.
Could still happen ;)

Anyway, my real point in posting was just to confirm that Lefty is, of course, right on the tie-breakers for seeding. Note that there is no tie-breaker for the actual championship, both teams are champs. That question comes up every year... I'm starting a FAQ.

#15 farce poobah

  • Members
  • 3256 posts

Posted 17 February 2011 - 09:07 PM

View PostBlackheart, on 17 February 2011 - 03:26 PM, said:

I know that I have read on here before (Sicatoka?) about the Sioux and Gofers tying for the league in 1997 and it came down to the third tie-breaker (goals against between the two teams). The Sioux won the goals against by 1 (I believe) and got the higher seed for the WCHA home playoffs. The Sioux end up meeting the Gofers in the Final 5 title game as the higher seed and accordingly got the last line change. The Sioux won that game on a great play be Peter Armbrust coming off the bench in OT and picking up a deflected shot and putting it past Steve DeBus. As a result, the Sioux got a higher seed in the NCAA's and had to win only 1 game to get to the Frozen Four (beat Cornell 4-2). Minnesota ended up playing Michigan St (Gofs win) and then top seeded Michigan (Gofs lost) in Grand Rapids. So getting that higher seed in the WCHA definitely ended up being an advantage for the NCAAs. I apologize if I didn't capture all the details but it was14 years ago... :)
Good memory there, Blackheart.

Let's take that "Never Say Die" attitude a bit further. In the first of those 4 regular season games, in November in Minneapolis, the Gophers had a 10-3 lead. The Sioux scored three goals in the last 2 minutes to make the final 10-6. Without those three "meaningless" goals, the Sioux lose the tiebreaker.

A great object lesson for the kids ... Never give up, don't ever give up.

#16 Runninwiththedogs

  • Members
  • 2199 posts

Posted 17 February 2011 - 09:10 PM

View Postjimdahl, on 17 February 2011 - 08:42 PM, said:

Could still happen ;)

Anyway, my real point in posting was just to confirm that Lefty is, of course, right on the tie-breakers for seeding. Note that there is no tie-breaker for the actual championship, both teams are champs. That question comes up every year... I'm starting a FAQ.

I appreciate your attempt to lift my spirits, but really the only thing that will work is two big fat wins this weekend. Eek.

#17 Oxbow6

  • Members
  • 3137 posts

Posted 17 February 2011 - 09:28 PM

View Postmikejm, on 17 February 2011 - 04:35 PM, said:

UND has one tough series left; Bemidji and Tech are 11th and 12th in the league for crying out loud.
Heck, Jan State is 9th.

There shouldn't be any question of the Sioux winning the league.

You nailed it...really couldn't have lined up any better for UND down the stretch. If UND doesn't win the Cup...FIRE HAK! ;) :D

#18 Blackheart

  • Members
  • 2437 posts

Posted 18 February 2011 - 01:56 AM

View Postfarce poobah, on 17 February 2011 - 09:07 PM, said:

Good memory there, Blackheart.

Let's take that "Never Say Die" attitude a bit further. In the first of those 4 regular season games, in November in Minneapolis, the Gophers had a 10-3 lead. The Sioux scored three goals in the last 2 minutes to make the final 10-6. Without those three "meaningless" goals, the Sioux lose the tiebreaker.

A great object lesson for the kids ... Never give up, don't ever give up.

Thank you. That was exactly the type of detail I felt I left out...

Sioux Pride! Never dies, it multiplies!

#19 duluthSioux

  • Members
  • 903 posts

Posted 18 February 2011 - 12:10 PM

View PostRunninwiththedogs, on 17 February 2011 - 05:50 PM, said:

Meh, you'd feel the same way I did if your team had been freaking blown out by St. Cloud.
I agree, that was totally disgusting to see. :huh:

#20 fightingsioux4life

  • Members
  • 2590 posts

Posted 20 February 2011 - 11:46 AM

View PostBlackheart, on 17 February 2011 - 03:26 PM, said:

I know that I have read on here before (Sicatoka?) about the Sioux and Gofers tying for the league in 1997 and it came down to the third tie-breaker (goals against between the two teams). The Sioux won the goals against by 1 (I believe) and got the higher seed for the WCHA home playoffs. The Sioux end up meeting the Gofers in the Final 5 title game as the higher seed and accordingly got the last line change. The Sioux won that game on a great play be Peter Armbrust coming off the bench in OT and picking up a deflected shot and putting it past Steve DeBus. As a result, the Sioux got a higher seed in the NCAA's and had to win only 1 game to get to the Frozen Four (beat Cornell 4-2). Minnesota ended up playing Michigan St (Gofs win) and then top seeded Michigan (Gofs lost) in Grand Rapids. So getting that higher seed in the WCHA definitely ended up being an advantage for the NCAAs. I apologize if I didn't capture all the details but it was14 years ago... :)
To go back even further and put even more detail into this, in October 1996, the Rodents swept our Fighting Sioux in Minneapolis. The first game was a 3-2 final, the second game was a 10-6 blowout. On Saturday night (which was the same night of the now-defunct Sioux-Bison football tilt in the Fargodome), the Gophers held a 10-2 lead going into the third. The Sioux outscored the Gophers 4-0 in that period. At the time, it didn't look like much of anything, but it ended up giving us the #1 seed in the WCHA tournament. That helped us beat the Gophers in OT in the title game in the old St. Paul Civic Center and helped us get one of those first round byes in the West Regional, which helped us get to Milwaukee and the Frozen Four, where we won our 6th NCAA title. It's amazing how small, unforgotten details can have huge, unforseen impacts later on.




Reply to this topic