gfhockey Posted yesterday at 09:27 PM Posted yesterday at 09:27 PM Per this link ee sprnd 2nd most out of Dakota schools in ball https://www.extrapointsmb.com/p/here-s-what-it-costs-to-make-a-run-in-march-madness and some of you want to spend more? Quote
Popular Post SIOUXFAN97 Posted yesterday at 09:34 PM Popular Post Posted yesterday at 09:34 PM or just win more.... 5 Quote
forksandspoons Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago 1 hour ago, gfhockey said: Per this link ee sprnd 2nd most out of Dakota schools in ball https://www.extrapointsmb.com/p/here-s-what-it-costs-to-make-a-run-in-march-madness and some of you want to spend more? If this is legit, this would completely contradict the narrative we have been fed in order to warrant an extension Quote
UND69er Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago 15 minutes ago, forksandspoons said: If this is legit, this would completely contradict the narrative we have been fed in order to warrant an extension Per this info UND spends $0.5 million more than NDSU. Results?? Quote
Popular Post GoodGood Posted 22 hours ago Popular Post Posted 22 hours ago 1 minute ago, UND69er said: Per this info UND spends $0.5 million more than NDSU. Results?? They don’t have to deal with COVID, transfer portal, and their location like UND has to 4 4 Quote
Popular Post gfhockey Posted 22 hours ago Author Popular Post Posted 22 hours ago 16 minutes ago, GoodGood said: They don’t have to deal with COVID, transfer portal, and their location like UND has to Good point 3 3 Quote
CMSioux Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago Would be interesting to throw a Venn Diagram over the top five NCAA MBB winners over the past 20 years and this list. Quote
jdub27 Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago UND doesn't own the venue it plays in, unlike the other 3 Dakota schools. I don't have the most recent numbers, but guessing just removing that and UND falls to the bottom of the 4 or very near it once you look at Facilities Expenses. Also, these numbers are shaky at best for comparison's sake as each school can report as they see fit. Some schools break more stuff out and tie it to individual sport, some just bunch a lot of that stuff together. 4 Quote
UND Fan Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago While this likely provides a decent comparison as to how much a university budgets/spends for BB, there are no set guidelines for how a university records actual expenses or budgets future costs. You are not looking at "apples to apples" numbers. 1 Quote
gfhockey Posted 7 hours ago Author Posted 7 hours ago 20 minutes ago, UND Fan said: While this likely provides a decent comparison as to how much a university budgets/spends for BB, there are no set guidelines for how a university records actual expenses or budgets future costs. You are not looking at "apples to apples" numbers. Where can we find the Apple apple’s numbers or is Chávez Cook in the books? Quote
coachdags Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 1 hour ago, jdub27 said: UND doesn't own the venue it plays in, unlike the other 3 Dakota schools. I don't have the most recent numbers, but guessing just removing that and UND falls to the bottom of the 4 or very near it once you look at Facilities Expenses. Also, these numbers are shaky at best for comparison's sake as each school can report as they see fit. Some schools break more stuff out and tie it to individual sport, some just bunch a lot of that stuff together. More to this point, I remember a discussion with a person in the REA chain. He was wondering how UND Athletics was going to help pay for the New Roof on the Betty! A numbers breakdown would definitely be warranted to see the real picture. Quote
HockeyHawk Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 17 hours ago, forksandspoons said: If this is legit, this would completely contradict the narrative we have been fed in order to warrant an extension Are you surprised Chaves didn’t tell the truth to the fans? But let’s be realistic the only way UND has a consistent chance at the top is to outspend others, people aren’t lining up to live in Grand Forks. Quote
Popular Post SIOUXFAN97 Posted 5 hours ago Popular Post Posted 5 hours ago 14 minutes ago, HockeyHawk said: Are you surprised Chaves didn’t tell the truth to the fans? But let’s be realistic the only way UND has a consistent chance at the top is to outspend others, people aren’t lining up to live in Grand Forks. same for fargo, brookings, and the milly.... 5 Quote
homer Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago I still think an internal comparison of spending/sport is more important and valuable. Basketball is still at the top of untapped potential for school exposure and opportunity for return and should be funded appropriately. 2 Quote
nodak651 Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 2 hours ago, jdub27 said: UND doesn't own the venue it plays in, unlike the other 3 Dakota schools. I don't have the most recent numbers, but guessing just removing that and UND falls to the bottom of the 4 or very near it once you look at Facilities Expenses. Also, these numbers are shaky at best for comparison's sake as each school can report as they see fit. Some schools break more stuff out and tie it to individual sport, some just bunch a lot of that stuff together. Athletic facilities debt service, leases, and rental fees is below Quote
gfhockey Posted 4 hours ago Author Posted 4 hours ago 3 hours ago, UND Fan said: While this likely provides a decent comparison as to how much a university budgets/spends for BB, there are no set guidelines for how a university records actual expenses or budgets future costs. You are not looking at "apples to apples" numbers. Where can we find the Apple apple’s numbers or is Chávez Cook in the books? Quote
gfhockey Posted 4 hours ago Author Posted 4 hours ago 25 minutes ago, nodak651 said: Athletic facilities debt service, leases, and rental fees is below Yeah, I guess it helps when other schools have fundraisers that are taking out loans or are actually fundraising for athletics. When all we do is fundraisers for academics it seems. 1 Quote
fightingsioux4life Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 42 minutes ago, gfhockey said: Yeah, I guess it helps when other schools have fundraisers that are taking out loans or are actually fundraising for athletics. When all we do is fundraisers for academics it seems. This isn't an academics vs. athletics vs. research issue. I believe we can be great in all three. False choices will only hold us back from our full potential as an institution. 1 Quote
gfhockey Posted 3 hours ago Author Posted 3 hours ago 21 minutes ago, fightingsioux4life said: This isn't an academics vs. athletics vs. research issue. I believe we can be great in all three. False choices will only hold us back from our full potential as an institution. Well, why don’t those entities have to pay rent at schools and we do 3 Quote
SIOUXFAN97 Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 10 minutes ago, gfhockey said: Well, why don’t those entities have to pay rent at schools and we do 2 Quote
nodak651 Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 5 minutes ago, gfhockey said: Well, why don’t those entities have to pay rent at schools and we do Just read the usage agreement between UND and the Ralph. Do some research to figure out how other schools pay for their facilities. Read the guidelines for how schools are supposed to fill out the NCAA financial reports. If you really care enough to find an answer you're gonna have to do the work yourself. There's a ton of naunce and schools report things differently. Quote
FSSD Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 4 hours ago, jdub27 said: UND doesn't own the venue it plays in, unlike the other 3 Dakota schools. I don't have the most recent numbers, but guessing just removing that and UND falls to the bottom of the 4 or very near it once you look at Facilities Expenses. Also, these numbers are shaky at best for comparison's sake as each school can report as they see fit. Some schools break more stuff out and tie it to individual sport, some just bunch a lot of that stuff together. Agreed, SDSU's reported operations budget for football jumped $2 or $3 m recently. I believe that $2 or $3 m is tied to capital expenses - paying off the bonds for the new stadium. Every school does it differently. Quote
SIOUXFAN97 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago how are we this "broke" when we've had to pay nearly zero for all our athletic complexes in the last 25 years...puzzlin' 1 Quote
HockeyHawk Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 2 hours ago, SIOUXFAN97 said: same for fargo, brookings, and the milly.... Sorry but Fargo is a way better place the GF, and Brookings is South and a little warmer. GF is by far the worst location. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.