bubbaball69 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 2 hours ago, Dustin said: Not sure which thread it was in - I couldn't immediately respond at the time - but there was discussion about scheduling FCS non-conf. to pad wins vs. scheduling tough/FBS opponents. Now that the bracket has been announced, and it does appear that SOS is a factor, even with a record that includes 5 losses, I am still in favor of scheduling the tough/FBS teams. May as well build the character needed for deep playoff runs. That was me and others. I think we schedule cup cakes and lose to the dakota teams we are still in. they arnt keep a MVFC team out at 9-3. Its just not going to happen no matter our SOS. Now a 7-5 team with weak sos yes. This conference is treated differently you get to 8+ wins your automatically in the playoffs as a member of the MVFC, is it fair probably not but thats just how it is, unitl other conferences other then MVFC and Big Sky step up it will stay this way. Quote
The Sicatoka Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago The change I see the last four games is X and Z went down. We can't win with SS and Jerry splitting carries and Jerry is the leading rusher. Brunell and Langama, time to show up big. (PS - two arms ... ) 1 Quote
Shawn-O Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 12 minutes ago, bubbaball69 said: That was me and others. I think we schedule cup cakes and lose to the dakota teams we are still in. they arnt keep a MVFC team out at 9-3. Its just not going to happen no matter our SOS. Now a 7-5 team with weak sos yes. This conference is treated differently you get to 8+ wins your automatically in the playoffs as a member of the MVFC, is it fair probably not but thats just how it is, unitl other conferences other then MVFC and Big Sky step up it will stay this way. The Monmouth AD would like a word with you. Granted the CAA isn’t what is used to be. Quote
MoSiouxFan Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 8 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said: The change I see the last four games is X and Z went down. We can't win with SS and Jerry splitting carries and Jerry is the leading rusher. Brunell and Langama, time to show up big. (PS - two arms ... ) Didn't realize that X got injured, but should have figured it out since he didn't play last weekend. Do you know if he's done for the year? We need Z back bad, and the fact that he dressed last weekend I take as a good sign that he'll be available this Saturday. Quote
The Sicatoka Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 7 minutes ago, MoSiouxFan said: Didn't realize that X got injured, but should have figured it out since he didn't play last weekend. Do you know if he's done for the year? We need Z back bad, and the fact that he dressed last weekend I take as a good sign that he'll be available this Saturday. Participation report says X has 10 GP and Z has 7 GP. Langama has 4 GP in regular season (keeps the year) and post-season doesn't count. Brunell and Langama have resume. Boys, time to expand on it. Quote
Dustin Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago If we get Z back, and he's healthy enough to be effective, I like our chances. Offense should get a big jolt in short yardage situations. A more consistent run game would ease up the pressure enough to mix in some nice distance (10-20 yards) throwing downs. I personally am not a big fan of a completed catch down that doesn't yield a first down. Quote
The Sicatoka Posted 54 minutes ago Posted 54 minutes ago 9 can't do it alone. If I can't have 20 or 28 someone needs to step up. 9 Sawyer Seidl RB 5-10 175 So. Hugo, Minn. / Hill-Murray 20 Xavier Leigh RB 5-10 185 5th Troy, N.Y. / Sacred Heart 21 Colton Brunell RB 6-0 200 R-Fr. Columbus, Wis. / Columbus 28 Gaven Ziebarth RB 6-0 205 Sr. Cambridge, Minn. / Cambridge-Isanti 31 Griffin Broderick RB 6-0 240 Fr. Minot, N.D. / Minot 32 Charles Langama RB 5-9 195 Fr. Maple Grove, Minn. / Maple Grove 35 Randle Parker RB 5-9 195 R-Fr. Phoenix, Ariz. / Mountain Pointe Quote
forksandspoons Posted 32 minutes ago Posted 32 minutes ago I've gone back and watched highlights of games from earlier this season. It appears to me that Jerry is more accurate when he's on the move. Hopefully, they figure out some ways to roll him out more. I am guessing teams have schemed against that lately. Quote
geaux_sioux Posted 21 minutes ago Posted 21 minutes ago I want to see Broderick so bad. Just give him 10 carries and see what happens. Nobody wants to meet a guy built like that in the hole. Quote
NDSU grad Posted 17 minutes ago Posted 17 minutes ago 3 minutes ago, geaux_sioux said: I want to see Broderick so bad. Just give him 10 carries and see what happens. Nobody wants to meet a guy built like that in the hole. He needs to learn to run behind his pads. A guy his size should have dominated high school linebackers, and he really didn’t. Quote
The Sicatoka Posted 15 minutes ago Posted 15 minutes ago 4 minutes ago, geaux_sioux said: I want to see Broderick so bad. Just give him 10 carries and see what happens. Nobody wants to meet a guy built like that in the hole. Put Mason South ahead of him as lead blocker and the tail back is still bigger. Quote
The Sicatoka Posted 14 minutes ago Posted 14 minutes ago 2 minutes ago, NDSU grad said: He needs to learn to run behind his pads. Let's hope that's what he's learning and acting on. Quote
Dustin Posted 9 minutes ago Posted 9 minutes ago I kind of forgot Gaven is a senior. Glad we're still alive to hopefully give him (at least) one more game. I would feel awful for him if he's played his last game. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.