Playoffs First Round: UND @ Tennessee Tech

[bubbaball69]

2 hours ago, Dustin said:

Not sure which thread it was in - I couldn't immediately respond at the time -  but there was discussion about scheduling FCS non-conf. to pad wins vs. scheduling tough/FBS opponents.  Now that the bracket has been announced, and it does appear that SOS is a factor, even with a record that includes 5 losses, I am still in favor of scheduling the tough/FBS teams.  May as well build the character needed for deep playoff runs.

That was me and others. I think we schedule cup cakes and lose to the dakota teams we are still in. they arnt keep a MVFC team out at 9-3. Its just not going to happen no matter our SOS. Now a 7-5 team with weak sos yes. This conference is treated differently you get to 8+ wins your automatically in the playoffs as a member of the MVFC, is it fair probably not but thats just how it is, unitl other conferences other then MVFC and Big Sky step up it will stay this way.

[The Sicatoka]

The change I see the last four games is X and Z went down. 

We can't win with SS and Jerry splitting carries and Jerry is the leading rusher. 

Brunell and Langama, time to show up big. (PS - two arms ... ) 

[Shawn-O]

12 minutes ago, bubbaball69 said:

That was me and others. I think we schedule cup cakes and lose to the dakota teams we are still in. they arnt keep a MVFC team out at 9-3. Its just not going to happen no matter our SOS. Now a 7-5 team with weak sos yes. This conference is treated differently you get to 8+ wins your automatically in the playoffs as a member of the MVFC, is it fair probably not but thats just how it is, unitl other conferences other then MVFC and Big Sky step up it will stay this way.

The Monmouth AD would like a word with you. Granted the CAA isn’t what is used to be. 

[MoSiouxFan]

8 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said:

The change I see the last four games is X and Z went down. 

We can't win with SS and Jerry splitting carries and Jerry is the leading rusher. 

Brunell and Langama, time to show up big. (PS - two arms ... ) 

Didn't realize that X got injured, but should have figured it out since he didn't play last weekend.  Do you know if he's done for the year?  We need Z back bad, and the fact that he dressed last weekend I take as a good sign that he'll be available this Saturday.

[The Sicatoka]

7 minutes ago, MoSiouxFan said:

Didn't realize that X got injured, but should have figured it out since he didn't play last weekend.  Do you know if he's done for the year?  We need Z back bad, and the fact that he dressed last weekend I take as a good sign that he'll be available this Saturday.

Participation report says X has 10 GP and Z has 7 GP. 

Langama has 4 GP in regular season (keeps the year) and post-season doesn't count. 

 

Brunell and Langama have resume. Boys, time to expand on it.

[Dustin]

If we get Z back, and he's healthy enough to be effective, I like our chances.  Offense should get a big jolt in short yardage situations.  A more consistent run game would ease up the pressure enough to mix in some nice distance (10-20 yards) throwing downs.  I personally am not a big fan of a completed catch down that doesn't yield a first down.

[The Sicatoka]

9 can't do it alone.
If I can't have 20 or 28 someone needs to step up. 

9	Sawyer Seidl	RB	5-10	175	So.	Hugo, Minn. / Hill-Murray
20	Xavier Leigh	RB	5-10	185	5th	Troy, N.Y. /	Sacred Heart
21	Colton Brunell	RB	6-0	200	R-Fr.	Columbus, Wis. / Columbus
28	Gaven Ziebarth	RB	6-0	205	Sr.	Cambridge, Minn. / Cambridge-Isanti
31	Griffin Broderick	RB	6-0	240	Fr.	Minot, N.D. / Minot
32	Charles Langama	RB	5-9	195	Fr.	Maple Grove, Minn. / Maple Grove
35	Randle Parker	RB	5-9	195	R-Fr.	Phoenix, Ariz. / Mountain Pointe