tnt Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 4 minutes ago, SIOUXELEVENS said: Maybe Carels fits better, I guess the GM knows and we will find out. I think it sounds like Carels is probably going to happen, but if you believe that there are two big defensive names tied to UND, then it would be between those 3 most likely. Seems pretty optimistic, but with Chyzyk I am becoming more optimistic. Quote
I Ranger Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 5 minutes ago, tnt said: I think it sounds like Carels is probably going to happen, but if you believe that there are two big defensive names tied to UND, then it would be between those 3 most likely. Seems pretty optimistic, but with Chyzyk I am becoming more optimistic. I agree on Carels. I was just throwing out the hypothetical of the other three righties if we were to be targeting them as well. Quote
scpa0305 Posted 8 minutes ago Posted 8 minutes ago 4 hours ago, I Ranger said: Let's say "if" we were lucky enough to have the option of Lin, Rudolph or DuPont for next year who would be the most impactful. I've brought up this question before to a few people. Who do we think would be more impactful on the ice an 18 year old Lin or Rudolph or a 17 year old DuPont? I get the prestige a DuPont would bring to the program but I feel the 18 year old's could potentially be more impactful in year one. Just my thought. DuPont 100%, especially at the college level. He’s the best dman in CHL hockey and he’s draft -2. It could be really tough to get him however. I also love Carels game, total stud. But the answer is DuPont. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.