Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, scpa0305 said:

There’s no way this is accurate.

The part about UND having the puck in the offensive zone more than ASU I believe. We just did hardly anything with that. 

Posted
29 minutes ago, Oxbow6 said:

Will leave this here.

.....and so it begins.

Screenshot_20250111_103532_X.jpg

Story of UND hockey the latest decade according to Schlossman:

UND Hockey Runs Into Hot Goaltending

Posted

When you shoot the puck and made average goalies look hot,

That's a sign of a bad team.

Scared to pass it around, no chemistry, no trusting teammates.

Just shots.

  • Like 1
Posted
32 minutes ago, siouxforce19 said:

The part about UND having the puck in the offensive zone more than ASU I believe. We just did hardly anything with that. 

This squad struggled with simple passing. ASU was significantly more skilled/creative than we were. The scoring chances were so lopsided. I was dozing off a bit…but I honestly don’t remember one. And we got that lucky shorty 

  • Upvote 2
Posted
1 minute ago, scpa0305 said:

This squad struggled with simple passing. ASU was significantly more skilled/creative than we were. The scoring chances were so lopsided. I was dozing off a bit…but I honestly don’t remember one. And we got that lucky shorty 

Don’t disagree. We had some spurts of extended zone time, but I thought whenever we got the puck to the danger areas we tried a dumb pass when we should have just got a puck to the net and create some chaos. 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
51 minutes ago, Blackheart said:

Most importantly…

Goals: 4-1 ASU

Bruh.....big picture. Look at the big picture.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, siouxforce19 said:

Don’t disagree. We had some spurts of extended zone time, but I thought whenever we got the puck to the danger areas we tried a dumb pass when we should have just got a puck to the net and create some chaos. 

I have heard this game after game year after year

  • Upvote 1
Posted
40 minutes ago, Cratter said:

When you shoot the puck and made average goalies look hot,

That's a sign of a bad team.

Scared to pass it around, no chemistry, no trusting teammates.

Just shots.

I’d disagree about an average goalie, Homer is top 15 in save % and GAA

  • Upvote 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Cratter said:

When you shoot the puck and made average goalies look hot,

That's a sign of a bad team.

Scared to pass it around, no chemistry, no trusting teammates.

Just shots.

More accurate assessment would be an average team shooting on an above average goalie is a better description of what happened last night.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
43 minutes ago, InHeavenThereIsNoBeer said:

I’d disagree about an average goalie, Homer is top 15 in save % and GAA

Top 15?

There's only 60 college hockey programs and only about half of those even try.

But it was a general statement over the last decade of watching UND hockey. Not geared toward this game per se.

Posted

NCHC league play goalie stats this season so far:

Save %

ASU 3rd

UND 9th

GAA

ASU 4th

UND 9th

Text Oxbow, early Nov, team wouldn't win a playoff game without a goalie. 

I thought I meant NCAA, guess it meant NCHC tourney playoffs.

Posted
45 minutes ago, Cratter said:

Top 15?

There's only 60 college hockey programs and only about half of those even try.

But it was a general statement over the last decade of watching UND hockey. Not geared toward this game per se.

There are 103 college hockey goalies that have played at least 20% of their team’s games. I’d do terrible things for UND to get a top 15 goalie at the moment

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, siouxweet said:

The fear of losing their jobs if they ever said anything negative about the UND hockey program.  Those two and Schlossman are the board members of the media division of the UND hockey GOBC.

I honestly like TH calling the game, but, I belive that Ryan Cunningham from KNOX could do a MUCH better job, if given the opportunity 

Posted
20 minutes ago, Oxbow6 said:

20250111_150225.jpg

Anyone else think that 5 deserves to be on the line somewhere, other than the extra skater?  Guy has worked harder than anyone on the team

Posted
10 minutes ago, 1972 said:

Anyone else think that 5 deserves to be on the line somewhere, other than the extra skater?  Guy has worked harder than anyone on the team

He’s got heart and plays hard but the other guys in the lineup are still better. The other guys haven’t been paired with the right players to make them pop. Second line looks good tonight but I’d still rather see Omac centering Berg and Swanson.

swanson playing with 2 guys that aren’t finishers this year is a waste of his playmaking skills. Strinden and Wilkie have a combined 12 points through 20 games playing with a guy who could be the best playmaker on the team given the chance 

Posted
10 minutes ago, hockeytherapy13 said:

He’s got heart and plays hard but the other guys in the lineup are still better. The other guys haven’t been paired with the right players to make them pop. Second line looks good tonight but I’d still rather see Omac centering Berg and Swanson.

swanson playing with 2 guys that aren’t finishers this year is a waste of his playmaking skills. Strinden and Wilkie have a combined 12 points through 20 games playing with a guy who could be the best playmaker on the team given the chance 

I'm waiting to see the other guys that are better, because they have not shown up much at all this season

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...