Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, forksandspoons said:

What is on everyone’s spring portal wish list? 
 

Mine: 

- 2 big DL with D1 experience 

- 1-2 LBs with D1 experience 

- 1 TE with D1 experience 

 

 

- 3 big DL with D1 experience

- 1 LB with D1 experience

- 1 TE with D1 experience

- 1 RB 

 

Excited, but sort of nervous for these next few weeks. If this coaching staff nails this again (winning the portal), in today's FCS, they will absolutely be competitive next year. I'm not talking winning a title, but no reason they couldn't be in that 2nd / 3rd tier. Competitive playoff team. 

 

Posted
40 minutes ago, AJS said:

- 3 big DL with D1 experience

- 1 LB with D1 experience

- 1 TE with D1 experience

- 1 RB 

 

Excited, but sort of nervous for these next few weeks. If this coaching staff nails this again (winning the portal), in today's FCS, they will absolutely be competitive next year. I'm not talking winning a title, but no reason they couldn't be in that 2nd / 3rd tier. Competitive playoff team. 

 

You think we need a RB? That’s one spot I actually like what we have currently. A couple nice recruits coming in too.

  • Upvote 3
Posted
9 minutes ago, geaux_sioux said:

You think we need a RB? That’s one spot I actually like what we have currently. A couple nice recruits coming in too.

Depends on if they think the #3 and to some extent #4 are legitimate starting caliber. If they do, then scratch RB from my list. 

Posted
9 hours ago, AJS said:

- 3 big DL with D1 experience

- 1 LB with D1 experience

- 1 TE with D1 experience

- 1 RB 

 

Excited, but sort of nervous for these next few weeks. If this coaching staff nails this again (winning the portal), in today's FCS, they will absolutely be competitive next year. I'm not talking winning a title, but no reason they couldn't be in that 2nd / 3rd tier. Competitive playoff team. 

 

 

8 hours ago, geaux_sioux said:

You think we need a RB? That’s one spot I actually like what we have currently. A couple nice recruits coming in too.

If there’s a player in the portal that can help you, then offer accordingly. As for RB, UND has a couple good players at that position currently and some promising young guys, but also no question there are some really good portal guys out there also worth offering. One injury and the RB room can look different pretty quickly …

  • Upvote 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, UND-FB-FAN said:

 

If there’s a player in the portal that can help you, then offer accordingly. As for RB, UND has a couple good players at that position currently and some promising young guys, but also no question there are some really good portal guys out there also worth offering. One injury and the RB room can look different pretty quickly …

Save for a chippah I’d rather they focus their recruiting energy on the defense and maybe another WR.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, geaux_sioux said:

Save for a chippah I’d rather they focus their recruiting energy on the defense and maybe another WR.

I’m for game-changers at all positions. If they’re good and want to be at UND, then get them to campus, as the rest will sort its self out. 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
3 hours ago, UND-FB-FAN said:

I’m for game-changers at all positions. If they’re good and want to be at UND, then get them to campus, as the rest will sort its self out. 

Yea, chippahs

  • Upvote 1
Posted

If you're the GM, what's the ideal # of players UND would have enter the Spring portal? Clearly, cannot lose any starters or ideally, anyone on the two-deep. Are we thinking the lower the better? 5 to 7 range seems ideal to me. That mixed with some of the guys that left the program prior to spring ball (ex: Teiken), gives you 10 spots to add. Looking what's happening to USD, seems like an incredibly pivotal time. 

Posted
1 minute ago, AJS said:

If you're the GM, what's the ideal # of players UND would have enter the Spring portal? Clearly, cannot lose any starters or ideally, anyone on the two-deep. Are we thinking the lower the better? 5 to 7 range seems ideal to me. That mixed with some of the guys that left the program prior to spring ball (ex: Teiken), gives you 10 spots to add. Looking what's happening to USD, seems like an incredibly pivotal time. 

At least 10

Posted
7 minutes ago, AJS said:

If you're the GM, what's the ideal # of players UND would have enter the Spring portal? Clearly, cannot lose any starters or ideally, anyone on the two-deep. Are we thinking the lower the better? 5 to 7 range seems ideal to me. That mixed with some of the guys that left the program prior to spring ball (ex: Teiken), gives you 10 spots to add. Looking what's happening to USD, seems like an incredibly pivotal time. 

I agree with this! 

Posted
1 hour ago, sioux24/7 said:

 

Really? I though Langden College was supposed to be a real dude. Is he not developing or just wanting something else?

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, siouxfan512 said:

Really? I though Langden College was supposed to be a real dude. Is he not developing or just wanting something else?

 

There was a lot of hype around him but keep in mind this isn’t the staff he committed to. He gave it a shot and maybe it wasn’t what he was looking for. Or the staff said he’s not what they’re looking for. 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
5 hours ago, shep said:

I think Tom then noted that they took their names out of the portal in what looks like a typo/error situation

I think he was saying they appeared and then disappeared and now they’re back in. 

Posted
7 hours ago, sioux24/7 said:

There was a lot of hype around him but keep in mind this isn’t the staff he committed to. He gave it a shot and maybe it wasn’t what he was looking for. Or the staff said he’s not what they’re looking for. 

I've said this before......In the past 8-10 years or so, to me guys who ended up being our best players were not the ones we were all exited about. 

And a few examples of guys we were all excited about  never panned out to be what we thought. Someone like Sammy Fort, many were really excited about him. Q had some hype coming in, ended up great for our program but never a starting QB. There was that kid that had a PWO from Oregon I think, lasted one year I believe. There is a whole long list of guys like that. 

Then you've got guys like Wanzek, Santiago, Olivier, Belquist......nobody said Boo about them when they were recruited. So honestly right now, I don't get too worked about any guy we get who is highly thought of. Not saying I don't like to see us get guys like that, I just don't get as excited about it like I use to. Need to see it translate on the field. Maybe this will be more of a thing under Schmidt.  

The hype over Deng was pretty high, that is one I'm hoping really pans out. 

  • Upvote 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...