Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

NCAA To Sanction UND if School Does Not Adopt New Nickname


Benny Baker

Recommended Posts

Funny....I stayed away from here because of all the know it all's that don't know what they are talking about, just speculation! I hear Goon cleared things up on thatthat argument so I thought I'd look...

 

You guys spin that info to say it proves your no nickname stance?!! 

WOW!

Looks like the no nickname option is gaining even more ground than it needs to, to make it happen..alright!

Get ready for the implosion around here...

 

What's with the new look? It keeps double printing some words for me???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a lot of "told you so" back slapping going on around here. 

Both sides can claim that because of one sentence:

However, the NCAA did say that if fans resumed using Sioux or Fighting Sioux, the NCAA believes other schools will complain and that, in turn, would very likely result in sanctions.

Remember when I asked what fraction of "no nicknamers" wanted that so they could keep on using the old nickname. Well, that's been acknowledged by the NCAA right there. And they're just waiting for it because they love to use their sanction hammer.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NCAA has ZERO authority to sanction a University of what fans say.....ZERO.

If that were the case UMD would be sanctioned for the smallpox blanket displayed at WCHA Final Five.....aand NDSU would be sanctioned for the tshirt of the bison fellatied "sp?" By the Indian figure.

Using this argument to try and denounce staying "North Dakota" is just flat out false. A lie. 

 NCAA can not by the agreement or settlement or legally in any way sanction a University athletic program based on spectators free speech.  

Those examples you gave above were part of the problem that led to the NCAA creating a policy on Native American nicknames.  Native American people did not like seeing t-shirts with a native american performing oral sex on an animal or shirts saying "Siouxper Drunk".  The NCAA can't force those shirts to go away but they can make things miserable for one of its member institutions.  The anti nickname crowd will be all over this and make the argument that no nickname was selected so the school can remain the Fighting Sioux.  Its exactly what the Sioux Forever crowd wants.  

This is really no different than their stance on the confederate flag at colleges in South Carolina.  They couldn't make the flag go away but they were able to punish the their member institutions in that state.  Those universities were not responsible for that flag but they were the ones who served the punishment with the NCAA not allowing any post season tournaments in the state of SC.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let turn on the NCAA translator for a few of you:

When the NCAA says: " ... the NCAA believes other schools will complain ... "

The NCAA means: " ... we already have a few lackeys and minions lined up to complain ... "

"It's good to be the king." -- The NCAA

One game into a series at St. Clown State and the minute one husky fan sees a Sioux jersey or hear "Let's go Sioux!" , It's over.  

With a new nickname,  you can wear the Sioux gear and yell "Sioux!" without liability put on UND.  Without a new nickname, the NCAA can place blame on UND.  

 

Bottom line...if you are a UND supporter...choose a new nickname.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spot on.  There's definitely some about facing taking place on this message board today.  Sure seemed to be a lot of bar-stool lawyers on here last week who were certain that UND's decision to not chose a new nickname would be in violation of the settlement agreement.  Looks like Goon did a great job of clearing up those errors as I don't seeing anyone willing to stick by their (old) position today.

Yet if UND goes with "no nickname" and fans continue to use Fighting Sioux, the NCAA will impose sanctions because it will have proved the UND did not transition to a new nickname.  Whether they do on the grounds that UND didn't select and transition to a new nickname and is in violation of the settlement agreement because they are allowing/encouraging fans to use Fighting Sioux or they just flat out change the rules to state that all member institutions must have a nickname does not matter.  Selecting "no nickname" will result in sanctions.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What part of this direct quote from the NCAA themselves do people not understand:

"However, the NCAA did say that if fans resumed using Sioux or Fighting Sioux, the NCAA believes other schools will complain and that, in turn, would very likely result in sanctions. The NCAA does seem to believe that UND has done its best to comply with the settlement agreement."

 

 

Edited by Sioux83
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you believe fans from one school complaining about another schools fans can make the NCAA play mommy, you're nuts!

That's how we got here in the first place! --> Opposing fans didn't like UND fans chanting "Let's go Sioux!" 

And the NCAA didn't play mommy; they played "who's your daddy." 

Edited by The Sicatoka
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What part of this direct quote from the NCAA themselves do people not understand:

"However, the NCAA did say that if fans resumed using Sioux or Fighting Sioux, the NCAA believes other schools will complain and that, in turn, would very likely result in sanctions. The NCAA does seem to believe that UND has done its best to comply with the settlement agreement."

 

 

Not sure you know what "direct quote" means.  You do realize that Goon was corresponding with UND, right?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure you know what "direct quote" means.  You do realize that Goon was corresponding with UND, right?

The NCAA sent them an email or stated what was written above.  Is that a direct quote by them to UND or maybe an indirect quote or a soft quote?

Let us know, chief.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NCAA sent them an email or stated what was written above.  Is that a direct quote by them to UND or maybe an indirect quote or a soft quote?

Let us know, chief.  

Hearsay?  Clearly not admissible in the court of message board justice. ;)

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Possible schools that would complain:

 

St Cloud State

Wisconsin

Minnesota

 

Emphisis on the first school, so it's obvious choose a new nickname and NCAA can't touch us as we would be in the same boat as Marquette, Dartmouth, and all the other Indian nicknamed schools that changed. As long as we have a new name you can still wear Sioux gear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will be the administration from another school complaining to the NCAA, not the fans from that school.

Or quite possibly some ofUND's own esteemed faculty, staff and/or students since they love moving the target to suit their own ends.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I recall correctly, the NCAA did not require UND drop the Fighting Sioux name. They said UND could continue as the Sioux if that is their desire. The sanctions for using the Sioux name were the penalty for continuing to use the name.

It sounds an awful lot like they have just said the same thing about going forward without a nickname (that will be a de facto endorsement of continuing to use the Sioux name). As far as the NCAA is concerned, they just pulled a Pontius Pilate and washed their hands of it and placed the final verdict in the hands of UND's opponent - whether on the ice, field or floor or the hands of the victim crowd. Any of these subgroups can yell "crucify them" and the NCAA, like Pilate, will happily comply.

Exactly and no one can say that the majority of the crowd would not wear Fighting Sioux gear (in favor of the plain UND gear) if they had no nickname, the proof was how many "Sioux fans" showed up at the rally a week or so ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

... they just pulled a Pontius Pilate and washed their hands of it and placed the final verdict in the hands of UND's opponent - whether on the ice, field or floor or the hands of the victim crowd. Any of these subgroups can yell "crucify them" and the NCAA, like Pilate, will happily comply.

You're thinking outside groups. 

I'm with ScottM; I expect there to be a Judas or two at UND more than willing to turn us over for crucification. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand everyone's concerns about possible sanctions if UND supporters (or too many of them)  wear Fighting Sioux gear, but is UND in violation of the settlement agreement if it moves forward with "North Dakota" for its nickname?

Nope.  Not until the NCAA says they are.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...