Shawn-O Posted July 21, 2015 Share Posted July 21, 2015 It would be wise to take two choices to the public vote, IMO. Otherwise the whole plurality/majority can of worms opens up. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackheart Posted July 21, 2015 Share Posted July 21, 2015 I wonder if they kill off the no nickname option tomorrow?hope not...like to see it make the final cut. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fetch Posted July 21, 2015 Share Posted July 21, 2015 We have the best name & logo & it will never go away no matter what this joke of a committee & Administration does 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scpa0305 Posted July 21, 2015 Share Posted July 21, 2015 We have the best name & logo & it will never go away no matter what this joke of a committee & Administration does Against the ropes, head down, swinging. I like it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siouxstudent Posted July 21, 2015 Share Posted July 21, 2015 When is this final cut coming? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southpaw Posted July 21, 2015 Share Posted July 21, 2015 When is this final cut coming? I don't think anyone really knows but it could be tonight. I personally think they should get down to 2 names tonight and get it to a vote in mid August. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teeder11 Posted July 21, 2015 Share Posted July 21, 2015 I don't think anyone really knows but it could be tonight. I personally think they should get down to 2 names tonight and get it to a vote in mid August. I'm pretty sure they'll wait for students to be back in classes before any kind of vote takes place. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siouxfan512 Posted July 21, 2015 Share Posted July 21, 2015 I'm pretty sure they'll wait for students to be back in classes before any kind of vote takes place. It will be interesting to see if they try to imlement the new name immediately, or if that would happen the following school year. I would assume it would wait a year as they will still need to create a logo and it impacts jerseys, apparel, venues, etc. ...unless they just stay UND Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWSiouxMN Posted July 21, 2015 Share Posted July 21, 2015 It will be interesting to see if they try to imlement the new name immediately, or if that would happen the following school year. I would assume it would wait a year as they will still need to create a logo and it impacts jerseys, apparel, venues, etc. ...unless they just stay UND They need the logo, ZERO chance this gets done before August 24, the first day of classes. I could see maybe a Jan 1,2016 rollout date however if things went right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siouxfan512 Posted July 21, 2015 Share Posted July 21, 2015 They need the logo, ZERO chance this gets done before August 24, the first day of classes. I could see maybe a Jan 1,2016 rollout date however if things went right. More or less, what I was getting at. I just meant, I wonder if they would try to implement something in the middle of an athletic season, or if they would want to wait until August 2016. I guess we'll see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siouxperfan7 Posted July 21, 2015 Share Posted July 21, 2015 More or less, what I was getting at. I just meant, I wonder if they would try to implement something in the middle of an athletic season, or if they would want to wait until August 2016. I guess we'll see. http://www.muredhawks.com/trads/mioh-nickname.html Looks like it took Miami OH under 3 months after the name was selected to implement it. Of course getting it on the jerseys would take a little longer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hayduke Posted July 21, 2015 Share Posted July 21, 2015 I'm pretty sure they'll wait for students to be back in classes before any kind of vote takes place. I agree. Without the student's input, all H.E. double hockey sticks would break out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teeder11 Posted July 21, 2015 Share Posted July 21, 2015 I agree. Without the student's input, all H.E. double hockey sticks would break out. I wouldn't be surprised if they did not use some kind of a direct mailing push or other means to get ballots to alumni around the world, too. That would take time to set up and tabulate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hayduke Posted July 21, 2015 Share Posted July 21, 2015 I wouldn't be surprised if they did not use some kind of a direct mailing push or other means to get ballots to alumni around the world, too. That would take time to set up and tabulate. Maybe a hybrid between direct mail/online? Either one would be a good way to do outreach to the alumni... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teeder11 Posted July 21, 2015 Share Posted July 21, 2015 Maybe a hybrid between direct mail/online? Either one would be a good way to do outreach to the alumni... I think the Alumni Review magazine, alone, goes to more than 80,000 UND alumni right now! It would be a big undertaking. How ever it's done, they need to make sure that it's a secure process. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siouxfan512 Posted July 21, 2015 Share Posted July 21, 2015 Maybe a hybrid between direct mail/online? Either one would be a good way to do outreach to the alumni... Agreed, maybe setup a secure voting portal. Mail login information to all alumni. Let them vote. Could do the same with season ticket holders and something similar for students through the U-Mail. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted July 21, 2015 Share Posted July 21, 2015 Keep finding ways to draw out an already drawn out and over-extended process. Awesome. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siouxfan512 Posted July 21, 2015 Share Posted July 21, 2015 Keep finding ways to draw out an already drawn out and over-extended process. Awesome. referring to? the voting process? If so, I agree this has been a terrible process to this point, but if the voting piece is drawn out a bit, that at least makes sense. That is the part they need to make sure is executed correctly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mksioux Posted July 21, 2015 Share Posted July 21, 2015 Keep finding ways to draw out an already drawn out and over-extended process. Awesome. Once the decision was made to put this to a public vote, they have an obligation to make sure only UND stakeholders are allowed to vote. This is the one area where they definitely should be "drawing out" the process and make sure they get it right. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hayduke Posted July 21, 2015 Share Posted July 21, 2015 I'm with both MKSioux and Siouxfan512 on this. To make it more legitimate, we do have to have a vote and it should only include stakeholders. Yeah, it draws out the process even more. But, if this doesn't happen, the buy in on the new name, no matter what is chosen, is in danger. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shawn-O Posted July 21, 2015 Share Posted July 21, 2015 Once the decision was made to put this to a public vote, they have an obligation to make sure only UND stakeholders are allowed to vote. This is the one area where they definitely should be "drawing out" the process and make sure they get it right. Included: Current students, alumni, faculty, employees, season-ticket holders/donors. Excluded: GF/EGF residents outside the above groups, ND taxpayers outside the above groups. Am I missing anyone? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hayduke Posted July 21, 2015 Share Posted July 21, 2015 Included: Current students, alumni, faculty, employees, season-ticket holders/donors. Excluded: GF/EGF residents outside the above groups, ND taxpayers outside the above groups. Am I missing anyone? I could live with those folks being considered stakeholders. My ideal group would exclude season ticket holders, but I could live with their inclusion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shawn-O Posted July 21, 2015 Share Posted July 21, 2015 I could live with those folks being considered stakeholders. My ideal group would exclude season ticket holders, but I could live with their inclusion. I think you have to be a donor at some level to even hold season tickets anymore, at least for hockey and football. Should non-alumni donors to academic programs have a say? I would error on the side of yes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted July 21, 2015 Share Posted July 21, 2015 There's only one vote that matters. That comes out of 300 Twamley. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hayduke Posted July 21, 2015 Share Posted July 21, 2015 There's only one vote that matters. That comes out of 300 Twamley. I see it as more of a judge having the right to set aside the verdict. But, you are probably correct. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.