gfhockey Posted Monday at 07:54 PM Posted Monday at 07:54 PM 2 hours ago, FSSD said: I agree with this, but to UND’s credit they are continuing to invest in highly visible assets on campus to make UND a viable option: Education: New aviation operations building and STEM Complex (Phases I and II). The university was also recently awarded R1 status. Sports: Proposed updates to the golf course, working with the city to expand entertainment and housing options. They made the difficult decision to cut men’s and women’s tennis. The only programs that really still need facility help are the Betty Engelstad Sioux Center and soccer. They are also in the process of creating a new campus master plan for the next round of updates. I believe the golf thing will be doa when it’s gets to county commission Quote
gfhockey Posted Monday at 07:54 PM Posted Monday at 07:54 PM 46 minutes ago, SIOUXFAN97 said: chavez has the northern sun on speed dial #1 that tells you all you need to know Source? Quote
SIOUXFAN97 Posted Monday at 07:56 PM Posted Monday at 07:56 PM 1 minute ago, gfhockey said: Source? mr nfl Quote
SIOUXFAN97 Posted Monday at 07:56 PM Posted Monday at 07:56 PM 1 minute ago, gfhockey said: I believe the golf thing will be doa when it’s gets to county commission Source? Quote
gfhockey Posted Monday at 08:02 PM Posted Monday at 08:02 PM 6 minutes ago, SIOUXFAN97 said: Source? County commission has said in the pultizer prize winner 1 Quote
SIOUXFAN97 Posted Monday at 08:19 PM Posted Monday at 08:19 PM just do the "project" and make the tiny tiny little course a frisbee gold course then.....or WELCOME TO UND'S SIGNATURE GOLF COURSE---------PAR 28!!!! 1 Quote
gfhockey Posted Monday at 08:35 PM Posted Monday at 08:35 PM 16 minutes ago, SIOUXFAN97 said: just do the "project" and make the tiny tiny little course a frisbee gold course then.....or WELCOME TO UND'S SIGNATURE GOLF COURSE---------PAR 28!!!! They tried frisbee golf there if I’m not mistaken Quote
FSSD Posted Monday at 09:19 PM Posted Monday at 09:19 PM 1 hour ago, gfhockey said: I believe the golf thing will be doa when it’s gets to county commission If that’s the case, you can’t blame UND for not trying. I think they came up with a reasonable approach for the development, and the time is now with all the work already happening in that area. I’m not a taxpayer in Grand Forks, and I can respect those who vote against it. Trust me, I get the pros and cons of TIF/PILOT programs. In this case, the community gets another entertainment option. I live in the Cities, where everything seems focused on paying for housing with little to no return for the general public atleast in my community. 1 Quote
The Sicatoka Posted Monday at 09:19 PM Author Posted Monday at 09:19 PM 3 hours ago, Goon said: The problem would be finding a league to call home after leaving. Unless you build one … see: NCHC. But your point stands. Quote
FSSD Posted Monday at 09:21 PM Posted Monday at 09:21 PM Just now, The Sicatoka said: Unless you build one … see: NCHC. But your point stands. I agree, but can you create a G6 Football Only conference? I don't think so. 1 Quote
SIOUXFAN97 Posted Monday at 10:10 PM Posted Monday at 10:10 PM 48 minutes ago, FSSD said: I agree, but can you create a G6 Football Only conference? I don't think so. no...that's why sioux volley was so adamant about the wac still having fbs status....i guess they (wac) didn't know there are /were whores out there willing to pay 18 milly to play in the carquest bowl.... 1 Quote
Kab Posted Monday at 11:11 PM Posted Monday at 11:11 PM There is no tax base on the golf course now so why stop the. Project, in 20 years it will be taxed if someone doesn’t like a shorter course don’t go there 4 Quote
SIOUXFAN97 Posted Monday at 11:27 PM Posted Monday at 11:27 PM 15 minutes ago, Kab said: There is no tax base on the golf course now so why stop the. Project, in 20 years it will be taxed if someone doesn’t like a shorter course don’t go there go the project...just go bigger but just close the course...bo should set about to get 2 or 3 more courses added in the next 10 years or so... Quote
gfhockey Posted Tuesday at 01:02 AM Posted Tuesday at 01:02 AM 1 hour ago, Kab said: There is no tax base on the golf course now so why stop the. Project, in 20 years it will be taxed if someone doesn’t like a shorter course don’t go there The argument by the other side well we are providing all the services at a discounted rate Quote
gfhockey Posted Tuesday at 01:45 AM Posted Tuesday at 01:45 AM LETS GOOOOOOOO ONE DOWN TWO TO GO city council is easy pass gotta get the county boyz on board 4 Quote
FSSD Posted Tuesday at 02:48 AM Posted Tuesday at 02:48 AM 1 hour ago, gfhockey said: The argument by the other side well we are providing all the services at a discounted rate Is there a TopGolf in town? Quote
Johnny Five Posted Tuesday at 10:55 AM Posted Tuesday at 10:55 AM On 8/7/2026 at 10:05 AM, jdub27 said: More evidence articles are being pumped out with no real thought: https://www.inforum.com/sports/bison-media-zone/mens-sports/mcfeely-protect-college-sports-act-could-be-boon-for-bison Given that it is going to be a "boon", seems like there is some actual language in the Protect College Sports Act that isn't exactly friendly towards NDSU but was glossed over: Reading the article would help. McFooly's main point had nothing to do with money, it was regarding rules limiting realignment and super leagues. In theory, creating stability for G6 leagues. No clue if he's right. Probably not. Quote
Johnny Five Posted Tuesday at 11:08 AM Posted Tuesday at 11:08 AM On 8/7/2026 at 1:11 PM, southpaw said: JMU was a great story this year. But, it's a tall order and there can only be one G6 school every year that does that. So, tell me who on JMU's schedule excites you? Who will NDSU get to come to Fargo for a game? Certainly, no P4 teams. Same goes for UND if they were FBS. Who's "excites" you on UNDs schedule? SDSU would be it for home games in the MVFC now that NDSU is gone. Maybe USD if they are still relevent, which at times is questionable. Illinois State or Youngstown on certain seasons, but do those foes really fire up the masses? JMU's schedule is ironically full of former FCS teams...which tells us all we need to know about the current status of the FCS, where maybe 5 schools have a chance to win a title this year (or one, Montana State). To each their own when it comes to excitement, I guess. Quote
Kab Posted Tuesday at 12:28 PM Posted Tuesday at 12:28 PM 12 hours ago, SIOUXFAN97 said: go the project...just go bigger but just close the course...bo should set about to get 2 or 3 more courses added in the next 10 years or so... Do an executive par 3 and have the city work on another course, don’t know where the money would come from. Are the country club and kings walk hard to tat a tee time at ? Quote
SIOUXFAN97 Posted Tuesday at 02:55 PM Posted Tuesday at 02:55 PM 2 hours ago, Kab said: Do an executive par 3 and have the city work on another course, don’t know where the money would come from. Are the country club and kings walk hard to tat a tee time at ? yes...tee times can be dicey...gf/egf need 1 or 2 more (after closing lincocln and rr) Quote
GeauxSioux Posted Tuesday at 07:05 PM Posted Tuesday at 07:05 PM Illinois State to FBS?? Illinois State AD talks potential MVC expansion and weighs FCS vs. FBS for ISU 1 Quote
jdub27 Posted Tuesday at 08:21 PM Posted Tuesday at 08:21 PM 9 hours ago, Johnny Five said: Reading the article would help. McFooly's main point had nothing to do with money, it was regarding rules limiting realignment and super leagues. In theory, creating stability for G6 leagues. No clue if he's right. Probably not. Money seems like kind of a big deal, no? I did read the article, but I'm not sure if Mike read the bill. A section carving out distributions NDSU won't get seems pretty relevant when you're touting something. In fact, he literally referenced it before completely ignoring the context of it: Quote The 171-page bill covers a wide swath. Of high interest is limiting athletes to one transfer, preventing coaches from changing jobs midseason (thanks, Lane Kiffin) and the potential of conferences pooling media rights money to make the financial playing field more equitable. All would be good changes. 2 Quote
Popular Post AJS Posted 20 hours ago Popular Post Posted 20 hours ago From Tom Miller's football mailbag today. Quote Q. Should UND be positioning itself for a jump to the FBS? A. I believe UND should do everything it can to position itself to be an attractive option for whatever the conferences and divisions look like in 25 years. They need to lock arms with South Dakota State and the Montanas. That’s good company but one more domino and the outlook changes quite a bit. He wrote about this right after NDSU's decision in more detail, but I really hope he continues to discuss this. Why? Drives discussion. It'll start getting brought up more and more to UND leadership during events. We share the same opinion on this topic, lock arms with SDSU and the Montanas. 5 Quote
forksandspoons Posted 33 minutes ago Posted 33 minutes ago 19 hours ago, AJS said: From Tom Miller's football mailbag today. He wrote about this right after NDSU's decision in more detail, but I really hope he continues to discuss this. Why? Drives discussion. It'll start getting brought up more and more to UND leadership during events. We share the same opinion on this topic, lock arms with SDSU and the Montanas. Agreed. Every mail bag or UND football 360 podcast, someone should ask the question so it is talked about publicly. UND absolutely needs to work closely with SDSU and the Montana schools. I wonder if it’d be worth an open records request to see if there’s been any sort of dialogue. I get they’d be pretty hush-hush and most would be done in person, but worth a try. Do those other ADs like our AD enough to lock arms with him? Do donors like our AD enough to financially back something like this? Albrecht going to Armacost to donate instead of Chaves doesn’t really instill a lot of confidence. Quote
forksandspoons Posted 26 minutes ago Posted 26 minutes ago On 8/10/2026 at 8:45 PM, gfhockey said: LETS GOOOOOOOO ONE DOWN TWO TO GO city council is easy pass gotta get the county boyz on board Lotta vocal people against it, but it seems like the majority is for the project, just not as vocal. Need people to voice support to the CC. Would be a huge mistake if it doesn’t get done. That land will sit unused for decades generating zero tax revenue. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.