I Ranger Posted October 29 Posted October 29 1 hour ago, brianvf said: I think this will be interesting for next year's squad as it sure seems Sam will need to come in but we don't (expect) to lose any D? Does someone like Komzak get pushed to the portal? Do we carry 9 D? Quote
siouxforce19 Posted October 29 Posted October 29 22 minutes ago, I Ranger said: I think this will be interesting for next year's squad as it sure seems Sam will need to come in but we don't (expect) to lose any D? Does someone like Komzak get pushed to the portal? Do we carry 9 D? Schlossman talked about this on the UND hockey podcast today. Sounds like we will plan to carry 9. I don’t think anyone will be pushed out, though someone could opt to leave as a result. We have had a lot of injuries on D the last couple years, so it might be smart to move to 9 D. Quote
brianvf Posted October 29 Posted October 29 8 minutes ago, siouxforce19 said: Schlossman talked about this on the UND hockey podcast today. Sounds like we will plan to carry 9. I don’t think anyone will be pushed out, though someone could opt to leave as a result. We have had a lot of injuries on D the last couple years, so it might be smart to move to 9 D. Agreed. We're barely into this season and have already had to play a game with every available D man playing...even had a forward taking shifts at D. Quote
TwamleyShuffle Posted October 30 Posted October 30 With the commitment of McKamey, should it not be a priority to get larger donations to the NIL fund to ensure he doesn't change his mind? Quote
scpa0305 Posted October 30 Posted October 30 17 hours ago, siouxforce19 said: Schlossman talked about this on the UND hockey podcast today. Sounds like we will plan to carry 9. I don’t think anyone will be pushed out, though someone could opt to leave as a result. We have had a lot of injuries on D the last couple years, so it might be smart to move to 9 D. If TK doesn’t play this year I would assume he’ll leave. Schloss obv can’t say that on the pod, but he’ll basically have to. Quote
gfhockey Posted October 30 Posted October 30 1 hour ago, TwamleyShuffle said: With the commitment of McKamey, should it not be a priority to get larger donations to the NIL fund to ensure he doesn't change his mind? Marathon and rydells competing for car washes. I give rydells the edge tho Quote
AJS Posted October 30 Posted October 30 15F / 8D / 3G. Any more in this day and age, does way more harm than potential good. 2 Quote
tnt Posted October 30 Posted October 30 2 hours ago, AJS said: 15F / 8D / 3G. Any more in this day and age, does way more harm than potential good. Did Michigan State decide they didn't have room for Potter a year early? I think I would have made room for someone like him, even if it meant carrying an extra guy. Quote
SiouxForever Posted October 30 Posted October 30 UND needs to get some players in the top 50 - https://www.collegehockeynews.com/stats/overall.php Annually, UND has one of the toughest schedules in the county, but it'd be nice to have a few guys high up in the scoring stats. Jackson Blake did well last year, but I feel like with the talent UND has had since 2005, they haven't had guys dominate scoring stats as much as they should given their skill. Brock (did) Oshie, Toews, Pinto, Gregoire (did decent) Kristo (did alright) Ducan etc. BC, BU, Michigan, Denver continue has players pop off. Quote
brianvf Posted October 30 Posted October 30 2 minutes ago, SiouxForever said: UND needs to get some players in the top 50 - https://www.collegehockeynews.com/stats/overall.php Annually, UND has one of the toughest schedules in the county, but it'd be nice to have a few guys high up in the scoring stats. Jackson Blake did well last year, but I feel like with the talent UND has had since 2005, they haven't had guys dominate scoring stats as much as they should given their skill. Brock (did) Oshie, Toews, Pinto, Gregoire (did decent) Kristo (did alright) Ducan etc. BC, BU, Michigan, Denver continue has players pop off. I bet our players stats (and our team record) would be better too if we'd played Denver's schedule thus far (NE, UAA, UW). It's not gonna get any easier this weekend either. We'll need to schedule more cupcakes if we want those high stats! I remember Parise freshman year when UND played a NC schedule of Canisius (3x!!), Niagara (2x), Princeton, Yale, Brown, and BSU. They went 9-0 against those teams...it probably certainly helped with Zach putting up 60+ pts as a frosh. 1 Quote
.357 Posted October 30 Posted October 30 11 minutes ago, brianvf said: I bet our players stats (and our team record) would be better too if we'd played Denver's schedule thus far (NE, UAA, UW). And then Denver plays Yale & Lindenwood before heading to Grand Forks. They deserve the early #1 because they've earned it & they're currently unbeaten. They're beating teams they're supposed to beat; that's what good teams do. Their PWR isn't taking any major hits. But they've had a very easy schedule compared to UND so far & they'll probably run into a buzzsaw when they hit the Ralph. Quote
brianvf Posted October 30 Posted October 30 1 minute ago, .357 said: But they've had a very easy schedule compared to UND so far & they'll probably run into a buzzsaw when they hit the Ralph. Man, we can sure hope so! 2 Quote
burd Posted October 30 Posted October 30 13 minutes ago, .357 said: And then Denver plays Yale & Lindenwood before heading to Grand Forks. They deserve the early #1 because they've earned it & they're currently unbeaten. They're beating teams they're supposed to beat; that's what good teams do. Their PWR isn't taking any major hits. But they've had a very easy schedule compared to UND so far & they'll probably run into a buzzsaw when they hit the Ralph. Denver has too much talent and good coaching to hit a wall when they start playing tougher teams (UND). But they would probably not have the record they have had they played UND's opponents. One thing, though. Carle is smart enough to let his boys drop one or two against UND to make sure they don't win the Penrose, something Berry hasn't figured out yet. Quote
siouxforce19 Posted October 30 Posted October 30 1 hour ago, SiouxForever said: UND needs to get some players in the top 50 - https://www.collegehockeynews.com/stats/overall.php Annually, UND has one of the toughest schedules in the county, but it'd be nice to have a few guys high up in the scoring stats. Jackson Blake did well last year, but I feel like with the talent UND has had since 2005, they haven't had guys dominate scoring stats as much as they should given their skill. Brock (did) Oshie, Toews, Pinto, Gregoire (did decent) Kristo (did alright) Ducan etc. BC, BU, Michigan, Denver continue has players pop off. I’m unsure why you posted this in the committed recruits thread. Quote
.357 Posted October 30 Posted October 30 Buzzsaw means overwhelming opposition & that's probably not how DU will view UND. Better to say instead that any points DU leaves GF with they will have earned. Quote
burd Posted October 31 Posted October 31 11 hours ago, .357 said: Buzzsaw means overwhelming opposition & that's probably not how DU will view UND. Better to say instead that any points DU leaves GF with they will have earned. works for me Quote
yzerman19 Posted October 31 Posted October 31 Absolutely huge get. Kid would've been a top 5 WHL pick if he hadn't declared his college preference, and he still went 2nd round. He's a perfect example of what could happen with a blue chip player when the rules change...wouldn't he surprised to see him play WHL next season and then arrive at UND. Still crazy that we have a committed 2009!!! The NHL scouts are going to love seeing how top players compete with older competition. He's positioning himself like Toews, Celebrini, Hagens, and Potter...if you can produce at a high level at 17 vs guys who are 21 on average...it projects really,really well 1 2 Quote
InHeavenThereIsNoBeer Posted October 31 Posted October 31 3 hours ago, yzerman19 said: Absolutely huge get. Kid would've been a top 5 WHL pick if he hadn't declared his college preference, and he still went 2nd round. He's a perfect example of what could happen with a blue chip player when the rules change...wouldn't he surprised to see him play WHL next season and then arrive at UND. Still crazy that we have a committed 2009!!! The NHL scouts are going to love seeing how top players compete with older competition. He's positioning himself like Toews, Celebrini, Hagens, and Potter...if you can produce at a high level at 17 vs guys who are 21 on average...it projects really,really well Initially I was thinking 'still a long time until he gets to campus' until you realize he's likely coming in 2 years when he's 17. Quote
scpa0305 Posted October 31 Posted October 31 9 hours ago, yzerman19 said: Absolutely huge get. Kid would've been a top 5 WHL pick if he hadn't declared his college preference, and he still went 2nd round. He's a perfect example of what could happen with a blue chip player when the rules change...wouldn't he surprised to see him play WHL next season and then arrive at UND. Still crazy that we have a committed 2009!!! The NHL scouts are going to love seeing how top players compete with older competition. He's positioning himself like Toews, Celebrini, Hagens, and Potter...if you can produce at a high level at 17 vs guys who are 21 on average...it projects really,really well I could see him finishing out the year in the BC, heading to the Dub next year then to UND the following year. Really depends on how he figures out the pace of the BCHL. Jumping to juniors at 15 is wild. 1 Quote
.357 Posted November 1 Posted November 1 On 10/30/2024 at 10:06 AM, AJS said: 15F / 8D / 3G. Any more in this day and age, does way more harm than potential good. UND is currently down to 6 D heading into Cornell. Do you still think 8 is enough? Quote
The Sicatoka Posted November 1 Posted November 1 It's how Dane Montgomery keeps a slot; can play either. Somewhere former MN Twin Nick Punto smiles. Quote
.357 Posted November 1 Posted November 1 1 hour ago, The Sicatoka said: It's how Dane Montgomery keeps a slot; can play either. Cool, I had no idea he would be on the roster forever. Quote
hockeytherapy13 Posted November 1 Posted November 1 13 minutes ago, .357 said: Cool, I had no idea he would be on the roster forever. He's a senior this year so hopefully we end up grabbing a guy who can be as versatile as he can be. Hasn't gotten many reps in during his time here but that's his role and he's played it well. Quote
ChadR Posted November 1 Posted November 1 15 minutes ago, hockeytherapy13 said: He's a senior this year so hopefully we end up grabbing a guy who can be as versatile as he can be. Hasn't gotten many reps in during his time here but that's his role and he's played it well. He's played 1:10 of shifts this year in 2 games.... Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.