jdub27

Unless there was an at-large bid no one knows about, IPWF was only there because they won the regular season title. However I'd argue the BSC still had a better showing than the Summit did in the NIT...

Now that the majority of the nickname sideshow is over and UND has a fresh start in the president's office, they can actually devote time and resources into important things again. It isn't a huge surprise they might be a little threatened, especially considering Kennedy has a background working with legislators as a former one himself while Bresciani seems to be willfully ignorant while doing things to upset the folks in Bismarck. Throw in McFeely's political leanings and his recent change in stripes where he defends all that is NDSU, no surprise he tried to create issues where there are none. Par for the course for him.

Congrats, the Summit has fewer conference games and has figured out how to use those extra OOC games to manipulate their RPI, which is public knowledge and openly discussed by coaches. You can really tell how much RPI matters when SDSU's is that high and their only chance at making the tournament was to win the Summit Championship game, they had zero chance at getting an at large bid. SDSU had a great season (despite those stinging losses to Weber St of the lowly Big Sky and Summit also-ran UMKC) but the chest pounding over an easily manipulated number is a little silly.

Looks like the committee is still trying to figure out a resolution to a problem no one knew about or even apparently cared about after it Bresciani decided to make an announcement about but they are hoping that maybe by the end of the semester they'll have it figured out. Looks to be a lot more than simply changing it, but it's done right?

I think it was the best choice from the finalists. If Shirley chooses to spend some time at a research university, I think the job is his for the taking next time around.

Not saying Daum isn't good, because he is, but considering what Crandall has played through, his numbers are pretty impressive for a freshman guard. Not that it matters because it's an Internet fan vote, not sure why an NDSU fan is in a UND fan site defending an SDSU player.

I actually thought the "Sioux" stuff was just as much or more noticeable tonight than normal. Guess I didn't notice a change in the reaction to Hawks mentions but you could be right.

Who said it has to be one or the other?

That was fun. Little lull, which is honestly tough to avoid when you're up that much and trying to milk the clock, but ending the game in something like a 14-1 run was nice, especially with Gene fouled out. Need that kind of shooting tomorrow. Hopefully McBuckets 2.0 and Baldwin feel comfortable in that the gym and can keep it up.

A great basketball mind told me that UND was going to work on taking advantage of the high post in ISSU's zone. Definitely seems to be the case.

"I don't want him fired I just named the thread Fire Mussman." -darell Please point out where I have "pumped up" Jones over a replacement. I've been critical of him while also putting into context his finishes and the other things he has dealt with. Did I hope for better results? Of course. But my stance has been that there are things that will be considered beyond on the court performance whether people want to understand that or not.

http://forum.siouxsports.com/topic/14331-fire-mussman/?do=findComment&comment=465455 http://forum.siouxsports.com/topic/15920-fire-muss/?do=findComment&comment=513980 That's two during transition but who's counting? I didn't bash you or pump up Jones, I merely pointed out my amusement by irony from what I thought was an incredibly hypocritical statement. But whatever, I'm sure you'll continue to go around downvoting my posts since I'm guessing makes you feel better.

Big game, perimeter defense needs to get back to where it was earlier in the season. I know some guys are playing banged up, particularly Geno, but can't let ISU get going from beyond the arc.

That is funny as hell coming from the guy who started the "Fire Jones" thread halfway through UND's second full D-1 season in a year they made the conference championship after making the semi's the first year. That's not even mentioning the multiple "Fire Muss" threads you started during UND's football transition. At least be consistent... Yes and I hope UND does as well. Let's see if Q can channel his inner Nate Wolters. I think the point being made is that some people were lauding Nagy while forgetting that there were SDSU fans calling for him to be fired well before he had a chance to make the NCAA tournament (I assume). Nagy obviously built up some goodwill in the D-II days that Jones didn't which likely played a big part in SDSU's decision making process.

He actually did Nagy a favor by inadvertently including SDSU's first year as a full D-1 school, it raised his winning percentage from 28.4% to 30.9%. It's not quite apples to apples because Nagy had quite a bit more time at SDSU before the transition, but if you count the four transition years and their first three years of D-1 play, Nag had a 79-131 record for a winning percentage of .376. For comparison, Jones record in that same time frame was 101-121 for a winning percentage of .455. Obviously Nagy had some pretty good years after that, having that Wolters kid blossom didn't hurt, but even if you include the 4th year out of transition for both schools (UND still obviously still having a few games left), Jones still has a higher winning percentage in that time frame, though that was the year Nagy punched his first ticket to the dance without even having come close prior. I'm not saying that one is better than the other, just laying out their records over a comparable time frame. There is no arguing that Nagy struggled big time during the transition and the first few years out of it.

Didn't make the GF Herald article but there was an interesting comment in regards to athletics in his quote on WDAZ last night:

Having more money to pay assistants wouldn't be a bad thing, we could probably quit having an average of a new one every single year. I'm not sure exactly how an sponsorship from adidias would work, my understanding is that typically for a school UND's size they get a discount of some sort on purchases and then X amount of workout/travel gear/etc for free. I don't know if what the current arrangement with Nike is and what kind of benefits there would be to switching to adidas. Last numbers I saw (2014) show basketball spent $28K on equipment/uniforms/supplies. That is less than what the women's basketball team spent and for reference, less than 12% of what the hockey team spent.

Yes. The MBB assistant salary pool is also the lowest of those 5 as well and on a per coach basis it is also lower the VB. Using full salary/benefits/bonuses, it was about 28% higher in 2013/2014.

The openly rooting for thing is interesting but I'd imagine Telfair and ISU would rather play a team they've beat by an average of 18.5 points in two meetings rather than a team they have lost to by an average of 12 in two meetings. UND held Telfair to 13 points on 5 of 15 shooting, do that again and I think they will be fine.

It would obviously depend on how the contract was set up but if I had to guess, I'd say they are working under the assumption that they will be.

You are correct, I finally found that it was a 5 year contract (and updated my original post). I think his actual base salary was actually only $102K, the $147K number included all benefits, etc.

He had one year left on his original five year contract. Not sure on the buyout amount but it was actually specifically stated that he wasn't let go after last year because of the cost of his buyout.

Bubba makes more but closer than one would think though part of the reason for that is Bubba requested a smaller salary and the difference between that and what he was offered instead be allocated to his assistant pool.

A lot of truth in this. It was ugly, they were down by more than the dreaded "5 points" they can't overcome and battled through early foul trouble but it was a win which is all that matters right now.

A lot of entitlement being spouted off. Everything's Faison's job and apparently fans have zero responsibility except complaining until they get everything they think they deserve. Finish fundraising for Phase I of the HPC. Start fundraising on Phase II of the HPC. Come up with buyout money for coaches. Last I checked, there is no money tree outside of the Hyslop, so if the money doesn't come from fans, I'm not sure where it is going to come from. It isn't going to come from the state, the athletics department just took on $1 million in extra expenses to help the University cover a portion of the budget cuts required and it isn't going to be any better next year not to mention raising funds for FCOA. I get the point that is trying to be made, yes it is Faison's job to deal with it but having the attitude that "It's not my problem, it's his" is a pretty embarrassing way to look at the situation. Just because something isn't public doesn't mean he isn't dealing with it, and part of dealing with it requires working within the budget constraints. Private donations were secured to help cover any shortfalls for buying out Mussman, it ended up only being under $50K but that's only because he got another job. Are there basketball boosters who are going to step up and do the same if necessary? Who said Faison was happy or satisfied? Who said I or anyone who actually brings up real life budget concerns are thrilled with results? You're so dead set that anyone who doesn't have a pitchfork in hand has to be defending Jones instead of actually trying to explain why something may or may not happen. The fact that there has been no extensions is pretty telling. There's a total of one poster who is actively defending Jones. That's it.