southpaw

Time to rethink another projection: the MPSF no longer sponsors women's lacrosse. Edit: my mistake... they have 3 teams currently. A dream conference for UND that only includes California teams.

I imagine they didn't want to remove UND from the streaming platform because it means visiting schools couldn't have their fans watch a top notch broadcast.

Please watch your language, changing a few letters or adding an asterisk doesn't make it any better. Also, the personal attacks on anyone who disagrees with you are not only childish but also against the forum rules. I never said or even implied anything you've claimed in the above post. All I've referenced in each of the posts have maintained that your reading of the below article is once again wrong.

Only you can turn the phrases "my thoughts are from way back" and "way back then" into something about the future. And you're right, he obviously knows more about the situation than you do because he is not grasping at any straw to try and keep an obviously wrong prediction going.

Because he literally says twice that he is talking about a long time ago but that it didn't go how he wanted. What part of this talks about the future? "My thoughts, Scott, are from way back. Why we didn’t take the four Dakota teams instead of worrying about going into southern California … But that’s just my opinion. Idaho was certainly always a great rivalry. But you know, when we had the Boise State and Weber and Reno before they moved up. North Dakota, North Dakota State, South Dakota and South Dakota, I think, would have been a great fit way back then. But it didn’t happen that way. " And he still said nothing about any of those teams going FBS together. I just did a bit more reading about Delaney. He was an AD at NAIA Montana State School of Mines (Now Montana Tech) from 83-85. You're great at finding random connections that never actually mean anything, but this is an even bigger stretch.

He was referring to back when Boise was still a member of the conference so nothing new. And he was an AD of an NAIA school so not quite as influential.

Fortunately, we have you to make sure it gets delivered over, and over, and over....

DU is there as well

I really hope you start the letter with the following: A person who several years ago worked occasionally in the athletic department well before you arrived is posting mean things on the internet.

Please send her an email and post her reply here since surely you know what she approves of.

Why even subject yourself to such an incredibly boring event? If it's boring, why waste your time? If you're happy with a tie, then just leave. You're not missing anything except boringness that bothers you enough to comment about it here.

Ok, so toss out the ACT argument because a few examples you know have succeeded. USNews still ranks UCF as a "better" university.

How is it objectively bad? Let's hear some facts, figures, graphic design concepts, etc on why it can be proven to be a bad logo.

Your stomach must look like that picture of DaveK...

So you're the one fan that walks out of the building after the 5on5 OT.

Yes, that's correct. He played 45 games, so he'll miss all of UND's 38 games in 2019-20 and the first 7 of the following year. But he's playing next year in the BCHL.

Someone on twitter replied to Schlossman's tweet asking if the NCAA approving COA played a role in making it seem like Major jr players are a bit more like college players now. The 7 games the following year makes sense, as UND was guaranteed to have at least 38 games this season.

No, websites like that don't get updated that quickly

Looks a little jaundiced to me

It's just a matter of time before Russian players are accused of doping, but FIFA will pretend like they didn't have proof until after the WC.

Lol....

This reads like the Herald was fine using a quote from Murphy to show Kennedy could have a bad review. That wasn't the case, so the Herald is going after another quote Murphy made.

Talk about a buzz-kill here in Germany. At a public viewing yesterday with 1,000+ German fans and it was dead silent after the game. All they needed to do was not play like junk and put one in the net against an overmatched SK team. With Sweden doing their job on the other side, Germany had the perfect opportunity to put up a three goals themselves and take the group. Instead, they finish last and now Löw should rightfully be criticized for his lineup yesterday. Özil never should have been in the game and he backed up his poor performance from the game vs Mexico with another lackluster one.

If the 52% helps cover the ticketing/accounting issues, then why is UND also paying a large amount of money specifically for that purpose?

It goes both ways. Why would someone think we care about what shirt they're going to eventually wear?