cberkas Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 12 minutes ago, siouxweet said: We needed some finishers. Do any of the incoming freshmen or portal pick ups fill this need? Lindberg would have finished in the top 10th, 10th in goals (T8th) Magnussen would have finished in the top 6th, 7th in goals (T6th) Malinoski would have finish in the 12th, 6th goals (T4th) Boser would have finished 18th (beat out 2 defensemen that played), 19th in goals Lost 1st, 2nd, 5th, 6th, 8th, 14th, 16th, and 18th (last 4 didn't really factor that much) This points totals Quote
brianvf Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 2 hours ago, Siouxdaddy said: I believe Carels is a silent commit or at a very minimum a lock once we tour him. 90% sure he is coming on a visit this week. I know Schloss said we didn’t have any, but he’s always going to say that, especially about high profile potential ones. People gotta understand too Schloss can only say so much. If he leaks something he’ll burn a bridge. 1 hour ago, AJS said: He’s playing in Game 6 tonight. Whenever his season ends I would think he’d schedule something shortly after, but would find it odd to have something already scheduled when his team is still playing. Timing could work out for a visit this week...looks like they have a few days off in between a potential game 7 (if PG wins tonight) and the next playoff round starting. If PG loses tonight, it'd be great to get a Carels official commitment sometime later this week. 1 Quote
AJS Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 1 hour ago, scpa0305 said: As we haven’t really hammered the portal I’m assuming we’ll get a pretty good young F and another good young D. Both will be up in the lineup. I could see Carels and Belchetz…something like that Schloss saying Belchetz name in a recent article is noteworthy. I do find it odd that Chyzyk doesn’t follow him. Quote
.357 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 1 hour ago, brianvf said: Timing could work out for a visit this week...looks like they have a few days off in between a potential game 7 (if PG wins tonight) and the next playoff round starting. If PG loses tonight, it'd be great to get a Carels official commitment sometime later this week. Would be interesting to know if a player can commit simply over a video-call, or if NCAA rules require that one must visit the campus first before committing. Quote
brianvf Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 6 minutes ago, .357 said: Would be interesting to know if a player can commit simply over a video-call, or if NCAA rules require that one must visit the campus first before committing. They don't have to be present to commit. Last season, Gibson Homer committed over a call. He mentioned that he had just watched the Spittin Chiclets video a bunch of times. 1 Quote
Mhockey Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Maybe a dumb question but I’m curious why chyz hasn’t sent out any bat signals for the portal pickups? Was that a one year deal? I really enjoyed the anticipation it brought when receiving commitments 😂 Quote
brianvf Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 4 minutes ago, Mhockey said: Maybe a dumb question but I’m curious why chyz hasn’t sent out any bat signals for the portal pickups? Was that a one year deal? I really enjoyed the anticipation it brought when receiving commitments 😂 He said last year that he wasn't going to do that any longer. Not sure why. Maybe he didn't appreciate the MTU fans doing it back to him when Isaac Gordon re-committed back to MTU. 1 Quote
tnt Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 1 minute ago, Walsh Hall said: Gonna be a weird senior night. Being that all three will be portal guys, right? Quote
brianvf Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago I'm hoping one of these portal forwards takes off like Rickwood did this year. So consistent and reliable with steady points each night. 2 Quote
InHeavenThereIsNoBeer Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago Anyone want to bet against Zellers having 25 goals next season? Quote
OopsSioux Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 1 hour ago, InHeavenThereIsNoBeer said: Anyone want to bet against Zellers having 25 goals next season? Not me. He seemed a bit snake bit at the end of the season but the young man can shoot. If he and Reschny both keep progressing I think there's a world where you could see 40+ goals between the two of them Quote
hockeytherapy13 Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 7 hours ago, jk said: About Malinoski and faceoffs, I was curious on his usage against Q a few weeks ago, and let's just say he had a rough game. According to the box score, he was 1-15 in the dot. He was fourth in TOI among forwards, so that's good. I know I shouldn’t put much stock into +\- but he was dead last on PC for all regulars in the lineup. That being said, we know the staff sees something there that my untrained eye cannot; plus scoring 11 goals 2 seasons in a row cant hurt his case when we will need some finishers. Quote
hockeytherapy13 Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 7 hours ago, jk said: About Malinoski and faceoffs, I was curious on his usage against Q a few weeks ago, and let's just say he had a rough game. According to the box score, he was 1-15 in the dot. He was fourth in TOI among forwards, so that's good. I know I shouldn’t put much stock into +\- but he was dead last on PC for all regulars in the lineup. That being said, we know the staff sees something there that my untrained eye cannot; plus scoring 11 goals 2 seasons in a row cant hurt his case when we will need some finishers. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.