UND69er Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago Some "experts" showing UND in Sioux Falls w UMD on the other side of that bracket. Don't like having to play them again. Also, would UND be ranked #1 or 2 wo the stupid loss to the Goophers? Quote
SJHovey Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 40 minutes ago, UND69er said: Some "experts" showing UND in Sioux Falls w UMD on the other side of that bracket. Don't like having to play them again. Also, would UND be ranked #1 or 2 wo the stupid loss to the Goophers? We would still be #3, but our NPI would be a lot closer to Michigan and MSU. As it is now, we have pretty much no chance to move higher than #3 Quote
InHeavenThereIsNoBeer Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 17 minutes ago, SJHovey said: We would still be #3, but our NPI would be a lot closer to Michigan and MSU. As it is now, we have pretty much no chance to move higher than #3 That's not true. We move up to #1 in 7% of remaining scenarios We move up to #2 in 21% of remaining scenarios. We stay at #3 in 32% of remaining scenarios. We drop to #4 in 25% of remaining scenarios. Keep in mind this doesn't even factor in conference tournament play so that adds even more opportunities to move up if we run the table there. Quote
The Sicatoka Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago I can look at IHTINB's table (objective analytics), but looking at bracketology (subjective) this far out is just noise to me. Sorry. YMMV. 1 Quote
SJHovey Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 1 hour ago, InHeavenThereIsNoBeer said: That's not true. We move up to #1 in 7% of remaining scenarios We move up to #2 in 21% of remaining scenarios. We stay at #3 in 32% of remaining scenarios. We drop to #4 in 25% of remaining scenarios. Keep in mind this doesn't even factor in conference tournament play so that adds even more opportunities to move up if we run the table there. There is a big gap in NPI points between us and #2 Michigan (1.46 points). That's the same gap as between #8 Denver and #15 Wisconsin. Quote
nodakvindy Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 24 minutes ago, SJHovey said: There is a big gap in NPI points between us and #2 Michigan (1.46 points). That's the same gap as between #8 Denver and #15 Wisconsin. A sweep of western would go a long way in narrowing that gap. 1 Quote
Dustin Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Unless you're going to be the #1 overall seed and get the Atlantic Hockey champion, I don't see much difference between playing seeds 13-15. Now maybe there's an "undeserving" bid stealer from, say, the CCHA, but even so, the likely candidates would be just below the bubble. 2 Quote
atxsioux Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Think with the CHL adding depth to almost all of college hockey you're now typically going to have a lot of quality "4 seeds" outside of that 4 seed from Atlantic hockey. That even would happen once in a while in past years, just think it will likely be the case pretty much every year now. Quote
InHeavenThereIsNoBeer Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 2 hours ago, SJHovey said: There is a big gap in NPI points between us and #2 Michigan (1.46 points). That's the same gap as between #8 Denver and #15 Wisconsin. Ok? Not sure how that changes the percentages shared Quote
InHeavenThereIsNoBeer Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 1 hour ago, Dustin said: Unless you're going to be the #1 overall seed and get the Atlantic Hockey champion, I don't see much difference between playing seeds 13-15. Now maybe there's an "undeserving" bid stealer from, say, the CCHA, but even so, the likely candidates would be just below the bubble. Agreed and even if a team steals a bid in any other other leagues they’re coming into the ncaas hot and with confidence Quote
TNF Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 1 hour ago, Dustin said: Unless you're going to be the #1 overall seed and get the Atlantic Hockey champion, I don't see much difference between playing seeds 13-15. Now maybe there's an "undeserving" bid stealer from, say, the CCHA, but even so, the likely candidates would be just below the bubble. And in most scenarios heading to Sioux Falls for attendance reasons any way with Mich/Mich St going east/northeast. The only issue might be seeding wise if we should land with Denver and they have to be placed in Loveland. But even then the committee most likely would swap citing attendance. Quote
90siouxfan Posted 10 minutes ago Posted 10 minutes ago I assume there is a scenario that drops us to fifth.... 2nd seed in sioux falls? What 1 seed would like that scenario? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.