Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

University of Iowa is inching closer.  I don't think this Coralville Arena project has the traction it does unless there is an unpublicized understanding with the Iowa AD on adding varsity hockey at Iowa.

http://www.sbncollegehockey.com/big-ten/2015/8/15/9159669/iowa-hockey-coralville-arena

Agree.  Iowa and Arizona St to the BTHC.  Women's teams will join too, so a women's BTHC will form too.  Iowa hired Gene Taylor to oversee their hockey teams start.

Edited by SiouxVolley
Posted

Agree.  Iowa and Arizona St to the BTHC.  Women's teams will join too, so a women's BTHC will form too.  Iowa hired Gene Taylor to oversee their hockey teams start.

In your scenario, the Big Ten would only have 5 all-B10 teams.  They wouldn't create a conference knowing they'll potentially lose their autobid if Arizona State decides to jump ship.  It's a different case in men's where they have 6 teams that are forced to be in the BTHC.

Why would Iowa hire a guy who has no experience in hockey to start a hockey program? Working at a school 70 miles from a powerhouse hockey program does not make someone an experienced hockey guy.

  • Upvote 1
Posted

In your scenario, the Big Ten would only have 5 all-B10 teams.  They wouldn't create a conference knowing they'll potentially lose their autobid if Arizona State decides to jump ship.  It's a different case in men's where they have 6 teams that are forced to be in the BTHC.

Why would Iowa hire a guy who has no experience in hockey to start a hockey program? Working at a school 70 miles from a powerhouse hockey program does not make someone an experienced hockey guy.

Especially when that powerhouse hockey school has no interest in having a relationship with him to help start up the program.

Posted

In your scenario, the Big Ten would only have 5 all-B10 teams.  They wouldn't create a conference knowing they'll potentially lose their autobid if Arizona State decides to jump ship.  It's a different case in men's where they have 6 teams that are forced to be in the BTHC.

Why would Iowa hire a guy who has no experience in hockey to start a hockey program? Working at a school 70 miles from a powerhouse hockey program does not make someone an experienced hockey guy.

Theres no alternative for ASU women's hockey unless they joined the WCHA.  No Colorado teams.

NDSU has studied adding hockey so many times Gene Taylor has the playbook memorized.  The current Iowa AD wanted more bizon blood.

Posted

Theres no alternative for ASU women's hockey unless they joined the WCHA.  No Colorado teams.

NDSU has studied adding hockey so many times Gene Taylor has the playbook memorized.  The current Iowa AD wanted more bizon blood.

Why is joining the WWCHA a bad thing?  I get that ASU doesn't want to just be associated with UND, Bemidji, MSU, St Cloud State, UMD but if ASU and Iowa both add D1 women's hockey it makes more sense that they join what would become a 10-team WCHA.

I get why they did it on the men's side but there was no talk about MN, Wisco, Michigan, Michigan St and Ohio State creating a Big 10 hockey conference with one part-time member. It didn't happen until Penn State joined... a full-time B10 member.  Until another B10 team adds women's hockey, they won't create a WBTHC.

Posted (edited)

Why is joining the WWCHA a bad thing?  I get that ASU doesn't want to just be associated with UND, Bemidji, MSU, St Cloud State, UMD but if ASU and Iowa both add D1 women's hockey it makes more sense that they join what would become a 10-team WCHA.

I get why they did it on the men's side but there was no talk about MN, Wisco, Michigan, Michigan St and Ohio State creating a Big 10 hockey conference with one part-time member. It didn't happen until Penn State joined... a full-time B10 member.  Until another B10 team adds women's hockey, they won't create a WBTHC.

Michigan and Mich St will add women's hockey as soon as Red Berenson is retired.  

The WWCHA will have to add Lindenwood and maybe other CHA teams.

Edited by SiouxVolley
Posted

Michigan and Mich St will add women's hockey as soon as Red Berenson is retired.  

The WWCHA will have to add Lindenwood and maybe other CHA teams.

please enlighten us as to why Michigan State will suddenly decide to throw cash at the money pit that is women's hockey just because Michigan's men's coach retires. 

  • Upvote 2
Posted (edited)

Why in the world is Mich St sponsoring women's hockey clinics if it doesn't plan on adding the sport?

http://www.msuspartans.com/sports/m-hockey/msu-m-hockey-body.html

Why haven't they announced a women's team in the four years they've held the clinic?  The same clinic that touts itself as:

The popular clinic - which has sold out each of the previous three years - is designed for the female hockey FAN, not just the seasoned player. 

They even teach you how to tape your stick!  Sounds like they're going after some pretty big players in high school girls hockey.

 And at the risk of repeating myself:

please enlighten us as to why Michigan State will suddenly decide to throw cash at the money pit that is women's hockey just because Michigan's men's coach retires. 

 

Edited by southpaw
Posted
 

Why haven't they announced a women's team in the four years they've held the clinic?  The same clinic that touts itself as:

They even teach you how to tape your stick!  Sounds like they're going after some pretty big players in high school girls hockey.

 And at the risk of repeating myself:

 

MSU let's their two women club teams practice in the same rink as the men's:  Munn.  It's a totally different atmosphere than Michigan, which wants a separate rink for women before they would start women's hockey.

http://www.michigandaily.com/sports/womens-hockey-persists-club-sport

Why would Michigan St add women's hockey if it meant conference games against Mercyhurst and Lindenwood?  A:  They are waiting for another Big Ten team and have women's hockey as filler on the Big Ten Network.   MSU isn't going to start at a level that is less than the Big Ten.

 

 

Posted

MSU let's their two women club teams practice in the same rink as the men's:  Munn.  It's a totally different atmosphere than Michigan, which wants a separate rink for women before they would start women's hockey.

http://www.michigandaily.com/sports/womens-hockey-persists-club-sport

Why would Michigan St add women's hockey if it meant conference games against Mercyhurst and Lindenwood?  A:  They are waiting for another Big Ten team and have women's hockey as filler on the Big Ten Network.   MSU isn't going to start at a level that is less than the Big Ten.

 

 

But with you saying 

Agree.  Iowa and Arizona St to the BTHC.  Women's teams will join too, so a women's BTHC will form too.  Iowa hired Gene Taylor to oversee their hockey teams start.

Then why would Michigan State wait for Red Berenson to retire (which I still don't get why that matters for Michigan Women's hockey other than you implying Red has so much pull in the UM athletic department that he can tell them a women's team can't play in the same arena... which just screams Title 9 issues).  

The Big 10 would already have MN, Wisco, Iowa, Penn State and Ohio State in your prophecy but apparently MSU is going to wait until Michigan can play too?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...