Shawn-O Posted September 22 Posted September 22 James Madison dropping 70 on Carolina, in Chapel Hill, is noteworthy. Quote
SIOUXFAN97 Posted September 22 Posted September 22 is it still "in kleiman we trust" in manhattan Quote
fightingsioux4life Posted September 22 Posted September 22 3 minutes ago, SIOUXFAN97 said: is it still "in kleiman we trust" in manhattan Kleiman is finding out that FBS is 1000% more difficult than FCS. 1 Quote
homer Posted September 22 Posted September 22 7 minutes ago, fightingsioux4life said: Kleiman is finding out that FBS is 1000% more difficult than FCS. His team was 3-0 and ranked top 15 in the country. They are also two years removed from a New Year’s Day bowl. I think he is aware…. Quote
fightingsioux4life Posted September 22 Posted September 22 18 minutes ago, homer said: His team was 3-0 and ranked top 15 in the country. They are also two years removed from a New Year’s Day bowl. I think he is aware…. But how would they do against the upper echelon of FBS? 1 Quote
SIOUXFAN97 Posted October 6 Posted October 6 is there a bigger spaz in fbs than pj fleck says u of mn has the greatest fans in nation and talked about a sellout....(empty sections in some ofthe shots)... AND they don't rule it a TD on 4th....replay shows no angle with the football crossing the line (yes it looks like he was in but the ruling on the field was short of endzone)...but no shot of the ball crossing the line......after further review with espn bets they rule it a td? wtf same with miami and va tech.....replay is out of control Quote
SiouxScore Posted October 6 Posted October 6 2 hours ago, SIOUXFAN97 said: is there a bigger spaz in fbs than pj fleck says u of mn has the greatest fans in nation and talked about a sellout....(empty sections in some ofthe shots)... AND they don't rule it a TD on 4th....replay shows no angle with the football crossing the line (yes it looks like he was in but the ruling on the field was short of endzone)...but no shot of the ball crossing the line......after further review with espn bets they rule it a td? wtf same with miami and va tech.....replay is out of control I'm a Gopher fan in everything but hockey so I disagree with most of what you have here obviously. I've had my problems with PJ's conservative philosophy over the years and it is nice to see him actually evolving a little this season. I watched every minute last night and didn't see any huge empty sections. Not only was Brosmer easily in on 4th down but he was in on 3rd. Those officials were horrible all night especially when it comes to spotting the ball. They made no effort to hustle in and look to see if Brosmer was in and looked like they didn't even want to make the call. USC's first TD was because a 3rd down play at the 10 was spotted a yard and a half off because the ref was way behind the play so it becomes a 1st down instead of 4th and 1+, Driver stepped out at the 1 pretty clearly and they ruled it a TD on the field but review caught that one, numerous times DEs were tackled and no holding call but they throw one on a WR on a big play and there was nothing here. My biggest problem with replay is this stupid part that says you need conclusive evidence. Half the time you can see the guys on the field have no idea what the actual call should be so why do we then need conclusive evidence to change that? I'm more than fine using common sense in a lot of these situations and I'm happy we are starting to see that more like the 2 situations you mentioned. Quote
SIOUXFAN97 Posted October 7 Posted October 7 19 hours ago, SiouxScore said: I'm a Gopher fan in everything but hockey so I disagree with most of what you have here obviously. I've had my problems with PJ's conservative philosophy over the years and it is nice to see him actually evolving a little this season. I watched every minute last night and didn't see any huge empty sections. Not only was Brosmer easily in on 4th down but he was in on 3rd. Those officials were horrible all night especially when it comes to spotting the ball. They made no effort to hustle in and look to see if Brosmer was in and looked like they didn't even want to make the call. USC's first TD was because a 3rd down play at the 10 was spotted a yard and a half off because the ref was way behind the play so it becomes a 1st down instead of 4th and 1+, Driver stepped out at the 1 pretty clearly and they ruled it a TD on the field but review caught that one, numerous times DEs were tackled and no holding call but they throw one on a WR on a big play and there was nothing here. My biggest problem with replay is this stupid part that says you need conclusive evidence. Half the time you can see the guys on the field have no idea what the actual call should be so why do we then need conclusive evidence to change that? I'm more than fine using common sense in a lot of these situations and I'm happy we are starting to see that more like the 2 situations you mentioned. what's funny is blandino on third down ..." you can't see the ball so you have to go with the call on the field" on 4th down...."you can't see the ball but you have to assume the ball crossed the line bc it looks like his head/upper body was over the line so i would overturn the call on the field".... Quote
cberkas Posted October 12 Posted October 12 Wow Alabama that was some poor onsides kick recovery Quote
cberkas Posted October 12 Posted October 12 Alabama survives, South Carolina had a wide-open guy when they went for two and overthrew him. South Carolina blew that game at in at the end with trying to tie it and when they got the onside kick. Quote
cberkas Posted December 15 Posted December 15 This Heisman was rigged. Not even the best player on his team, at the positions (team and nation). What a joke Quote
fightingsioux4life Posted December 15 Posted December 15 1 hour ago, cberkas said: This Heisman was rigged. Not even the best player on his team, at the positions (team and nation). What a joke I have never cared all that much about the Heisman. Too political and media driven. Quote
cberkas Posted December 15 Posted December 15 1 minute ago, fightingsioux4life said: I have never cared all that much about the Heisman. Too political and media driven. I have to agree with people saying if he didn't play at Colorado and for Deion no one would know who he is. Quote
Oxbow6 Posted December 15 Posted December 15 Heisman is for the top college FB players. Hard to argue when Hunter impacted the game more than any other player playing in all 3 phases. 670 plays on offense, 680+ on defense and played some special teams. The RB from Boise wins it if he doesn't play at Boise and in a better conference. Quote
GoodGood Posted December 15 Posted December 15 10 hours ago, cberkas said: I have to agree with people saying if he didn't play at Colorado and for Deion no one would know who he is. The kid might be the #1 pick in the draft but yea no one would know who he is if he didn’t play at Colorado 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.