Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

What's it going to take to hang #8?


Recommended Posts

Posted

I take it you mean besides BC. One NT every 3.5 years on average does seem like parity to me. I would have been happy with 1 in the last 10. How about you.

I'm not sure what I need to explain since my post quite clearly detailed the ten titles in the past fourteen years won by schools NOT named Boston College...what's not clear?

Posted

You're right - he is entitled to his own opinions. However, if all you're going to do on this site is come on and post:

ffffire Hhak

all haill hhak!

patented thrid perid letdownnn

jjjust buzzzed bud

You're not adding anything to the conversation. Please go away.

And frankly - I don't care whether you think I add anything or not, I'm here to stay. You don't like - you leave!

You're right - he is entitled to his own opinions. However, if all you're going to do on this site is come on and post:

ffffire Hhak

all haill hhak!

patented thrid perid letdownnn

jjjust buzzzed bud

You're not adding anything to the conversation. Please go away.

Posted

I'm not sure what I need to explain since my post quite clearly detailed the ten titles in the past fourteen years won by schools NOT named Boston College...what's not clear?

Nothing - I just don't see as much parity as you apparently do based on one team winning a NT 4 times in 14 years. I think they have pretty much established that they are a notch above everybody else - clear?

Posted

Nothing - I just don't see as much parity as you apparently do based on one team winning a NT 4 times in 14 years. I think they have pretty much established that they are a notch above everybody else - clear?

So 5 different WCHA teams winning national titles in a 14 year span isn't "parity" in a conference to you? Seems like that's a pretty good run for one conference. Imagine if only ONE WCHA team was head and shoulders above the rest during that same time-span...dare I say they'd out-number BC in terms of titles?

Posted

So 5 different WCHA teams winning national titles in a 14 year span isn't "parity" in a conference to you? Seems like that's a pretty good run for one conference. Imagine if only ONE WCHA team was head and shoulders above the rest during that same time-span...dare I say they'd out-number BC in terms of titles?

But your initial post made reference to the ten years BC did not win as well as reference to the 5 different winning teams from one conference during that time period. Therefore I viewed your statement as one regarding college hockey in general and, my response was with regard to college hockey in general only.

If you want to throw BC out the equation then I completely agree with you that there is great parity in college hockey. But, based on 4 titles in 14 years (as well as 3 runner-up finishes in the other ten years), there is no doubt in my mind that BC and parity do not belong in the same sentence over the last 14 years. And it remains my opinion (and trust me as a born and raised Grand Forks boy it pains me to say it) that BC has separated themselves from the rest of college hockey over the last decade plus of college hockey.

Posted

yeah hockeyisgr8

I doubt most of these people on here are bron and raised in GF like us

some people don't understand the true grand forks love for winning

I don't know how many were bron in grand forks. Some of us were born here and have lived around Grand Forks most of our lives. I'm pretty sure that most people that are interested in sports really love winning. That isn't special to Grand Forks.
Posted

I'm not sure what I need to explain since my post quite clearly detailed the ten titles in the past fourteen years won by schools NOT named Boston College...what's not clear?

And not named North Dakota
Posted

But your initial post made reference to the ten years BC did not win as well as reference to the 5 different winning teams from one conference during that time period. Therefore I viewed your statement as one regarding college hockey in general and, my response was with regard to college hockey in general only.

If you want to throw BC out the equation then I completely agree with you that there is great parity in college hockey. But, based on 4 titles in 14 years (as well as 3 runner-up finishes in the other ten years), there is no doubt in my mind that BC and parity do not belong in the same sentence over the last 14 years. And it remains my opinion (and trust me as a born and raised Grand Forks boy it pains me to say it) that BC has separated themselves from the rest of college hockey over the last decade plus of college hockey.

There is parity in hockey just like there was parity from 78-00 only it was us not BC that seperated ourselves.
Posted

There is parity in hockey just like there was parity from 78-00 only it was us not BC that seperated ourselves.

Oh please. From 88-96 there was nothing but gloom and doom in Grand Forks.

Posted

First, gfhockey, doesn't have to go away. We are all entitled to our own opinion, even if you don't like it.

Second, I don't think anything he said in his post that prompted you to tell him to go away was in any way inaccurate, so why do you object to those statements?

Apparently you are not reading his garbage than!

I also feel he should just go away!

Posted

Oh please. From 88-96 there was nothing but gloom and doom in Grand Forks.

Easy...I was there during some of those years. I brought anything but doom and gloom to UND and GF! :)

Posted

Back on topic - A lesson we saw reinforced today - never go into a prevent or defensive shell - It never seems to end well for us. Keep doing what got you the lead in the first place.

Posted

I doubt most of these people on here are bron and raised in GF like us

That has nothing to do with anything when it comes to wanting a national title or not.

And, for the record, I was born and raised in GF as well.

Posted

There is parity in hockey just like there was parity from 78-00 only it was us not BC that seperated ourselves.

another aspect of this is that college hockey in general is down in talent. overall, today's college hockey is not on the same level as it was from 2000-2010.

Posted

Back on topic - A lesson we saw reinforced today - never go into a prevent or defensive shell - It never seems to end well for us. Keep doing what got you the lead in the first place.

One of the first things I thought of when the women did that... we've seen it bite our asses and it sure as heck bit the women today.

Posted

If you want to throw BC out the equation then I completely agree with you that there is great parity in college hockey. But, based on 4 titles in 14 years (as well as 3 runner-up finishes in the other ten years), there is no doubt in my mind that BC and parity do not belong in the same sentence over the last 14 years. And it remains my opinion (and trust me as a born and raised Grand Forks boy it pains me to say it) that BC has separated themselves from the rest of college hockey over the last decade plus of college hockey.

I'd concur that BC has been the gold standard of college hockey since 2000 and don't disagree with anything you stated above.

Posted

08, 10, and 12...the evil empire.

I know parity is getting much better but when all nattys come from the former big 3 hockey conferences that doesn't necessarily ooze parity. However if another ecac team wins this year I will change my mind.

Posted

I know parity is getting much better but when all nattys come from the former big 3 hockey conferences that doesn't necessarily ooze parity. However if another ecac team wins this year I will change my mind.

I wasn't trying to suggest conference parity as much as I was team parity. 5 of the 12 WCHA teams (and you could honestly say 10 WCHA teams since most of the past 14 seasons was played without Bemidji and UNO as conference members) have NCAA titles since 2000. That's an impressive statistic.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...