zonadub Posted June 3, 2014 Share Posted June 3, 2014 Talk about butthurt at being rejected by the Big Sky. Those numbskulls still are hoping we get kicked out of the BSC as some sort of poetic justice for rejecting NDSU. http://www.bisonvill...ngs-in-GF/page2 Strange Tony hasn't thrown a party thread for Ryan Bakken's retirement. BV couldn't wrap thair noggins around that Bakken was no longer a sportswriter, but someone who wrote satire. If you joke about NDSU, its always taken seriously down in BV and it is taken to heart like a crime against the state. Ryan Bakken is equivalent to Osama down there. Just confirmation that NDSU would still prefer to be in the Big Sky, despite all their protestations to the contrary. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bison Dan Posted June 3, 2014 Share Posted June 3, 2014 Just confirmation that NDSU would still prefer to be in the Big Sky, despite all their protestations to the contrary. Yeah right! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UNDColorado Posted June 3, 2014 Share Posted June 3, 2014 Talk about butthurt at being rejected by the Big Sky. Those numbskulls still are hoping we get kicked out of the BSC as some sort of poetic justice for rejecting NDSU. http://www.bisonvill...ngs-in-GF/page2 Strange Tony hasn't thrown a party thread for Ryan Bakken's retirement. BV couldn't wrap thair noggins around that Bakken was no longer a sportswriter, but someone who wrote satire. If you joke about NDSU, its always taken seriously down in BV and it is taken to heart like a crime against the state. Ryan Bakken is equivalent to Osama down there. I just bit on that link. Proud to say only my third time ever reading that site. The butthurt is indeed strong over there. Pathetic really. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CMSioux Posted June 3, 2014 Share Posted June 3, 2014 So B.D can you share the infactuation with the Big Sky and the need to have a Big Sky conference meeting thread at BV - other than the ongoing need to feel good by putting UND down. Do you think there would ever be a MVFC Meeting thread in Sioux Sports? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoSiouxFan Posted June 3, 2014 Share Posted June 3, 2014 It's great that the BSC is having their annual meeting at UND so that, amongst other things, they can see what fantastic facilities we have (and will have). In a way, it would have been nice to have had the meetings at UND next year so that they could have seen the IPF nearly finished and the new $130 million (?) Medical School under construction. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vegas_Sioux Posted June 3, 2014 Share Posted June 3, 2014 They can feel the new med school under construction at least. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted June 4, 2014 Share Posted June 4, 2014 I think the lurkers need to see this again. According to bison and jack fans, the Big Sky can't wait to get rid of UND. But according to the Big Sky's own documents, the Big Sky considers Montana, Montana State, and UND to be the three key schools in the conference. Idaho's own acceptance is dependent on those three still being members, otherwise Idaho can back out of joining at no cost: 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hayduke Posted June 4, 2014 Share Posted June 4, 2014 I think the lurkers need to see this again. We are THE flagship university in North Dakota. Leaders come from UND. They are the support school. That's okay. The world needs ditchdiggers too. I'm still not sure about third rate salespeople though... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulk Truck Posted June 4, 2014 Share Posted June 4, 2014 Idaho is FBS and yet they are nothing but a shadow of their true peers UND, Montana U, Montana State and Idaho State in terms of comparison in the Big Sky Conference. Idaho for almost 20 years has been a lost soul in D-1 athletics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bincitysioux Posted June 4, 2014 Author Share Posted June 4, 2014 Per Tom Miller's Twitter: Just spoke with Big Sky commissioner Doug Fullerton, who says the league will explore predetermined sites for league basketball tourneys The next step is a formal proposal to league presidents. Fullerton's biggest concern is to keep championship game attendance at decent mark Hopefully Fullerton can talk the Presidents out of it..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darell1976 Posted June 4, 2014 Share Posted June 4, 2014 Per Tom Miller's Twitter: Hopefully Fullerton can talk the Presidents out of it..... The pro is you can plan for it better, the con is it makes the regular season less special. I would rather have it at the winner of the regular season champ. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darell1976 Posted June 4, 2014 Share Posted June 4, 2014 Per Tom Miller's Twitter: Hopefully Fullerton can talk the Presidents out of it..... http://www.bigskyconf.com/news/2014/6/4/MBB_0604140741.aspx "While our current format often leads to strong attendance and does a great job of protecting our top team, we also realize it has become problematic for many reasons,'' Fullerton said. "Our school administrators and coaches have raised valid concerns, including travel costs, travel logistics, student-athlete welfare, and fan experience. We need to continue to have discussions regarding how many teams will qualify, and if we move to a predetermined site, where that will be and if the location will be the same for the men and the women." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulk Truck Posted June 5, 2014 Share Posted June 5, 2014 The MVFC, BSC, SL, WWC, WAC, and sadly the NCHC are not going to be premier D-1 conferences no matter how many ways anyone attempts to explain, rationalize, or justify their existence. That is IMO a fact of life, AAA baseball, the minor leagues, or whatever term someone cares to use. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UND1983 Posted June 5, 2014 Share Posted June 5, 2014 The MVFC, BSC, SL, WWC, WAC, and sadly the NCHC are not going to be premier D-1 conferences no matter how many ways anyone attempts to explain, rationalize, or justify their existence. That is IMO a fact of life, AAA baseball, the minor leagues, or whatever term someone cares to use. Thanks for the breaking news. We can all adjust are hopes now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nodak651 Posted June 5, 2014 Share Posted June 5, 2014 Nchc is a premier d1 conference for its sport. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darell1976 Posted June 6, 2014 Share Posted June 6, 2014 Winning Percentage-overall (2013-14) 1. Big 10 .535 2. HE .527 3. NCHC, ECAC .506 5. WCHA .470 6. AH .442 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nodak651 Posted June 6, 2014 Share Posted June 6, 2014 Winning Percentage-overall (2013-14) 1. Big 10 .535 2. HE .527 3. NCHC, ECAC .506 5. WCHA .470 6. AH .442 You're basing the legitimacy of a conference on one season? The NCHC has two of the top five programs of all time... look at the programs at each member institution and tell me the conference is on par with the ECAC, please... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darell1976 Posted June 6, 2014 Share Posted June 6, 2014 You're basing the legitimacy of a conference on one season? The NCHC has two of the top five programs of all time... look at the programs at each member institution and tell me the conference is on par with the ECAC, please... The Big 10 has only 6 members and the NCHC has 8 so numbers aren't exact "science" in determining which conference is better. I would say its pretty even with the top 3 (or 4). .029 separates them. NCHC had 3 playoff teams, Big 10 had 2, HE had 4. But IMO the NCHC is one of the premier conferences in DI hockey. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nodak651 Posted June 6, 2014 Share Posted June 6, 2014 The Big 10 has only 6 members and the NCHC has 8 so numbers aren't exact "science" in determining which conference is better. I would say its pretty even with the top 3 (or 4). .029 separates them. NCHC had 3 playoff teams, Big 10 had 2, HE had 4. But IMO the NCHC is one of the premier conferences in DI hockey. Gotcha, we're on the same page. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darell1976 Posted June 6, 2014 Share Posted June 6, 2014 Gotcha, we're on the same page. I should have explained a little more in the other post. It's all good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulk Truck Posted June 6, 2014 Share Posted June 6, 2014 Like it or not, the Big 10 hockey conference has significant upside potential.It has high profile schools, ample money to fund the programs, it has at least 4 programs with strong traditions and will only get stronger IMO as time goes on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nodak651 Posted June 6, 2014 Share Posted June 6, 2014 Like it or not, the Big 10 hockey conference has significant upside potential.It has high profile schools, ample money to fund the programs, it has at least 4 programs with strong traditions and will only get stronger IMO as time goes on. I think the Big 10 will be good for college hockey in the long run. Success there could prompt larger schools in the west to add hockey down the road and the NCHC would be the logical landing spot for any large school. Their downfall is only having six schools, obviously. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nodak651 Posted June 6, 2014 Share Posted June 6, 2014 I agree with you if it wasn't clear. I think hockey east the big and the NCHC will battle for the top for years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulk Truck Posted June 6, 2014 Share Posted June 6, 2014 With the initiation of hockey at Penn State, the Big 10 now had enough teams to form their own hockey conference under the umbrella of the Big 10. Six teams were needed to obtain an automatic qualifier for post season play. Hockey is one of a limited few of major sports in the Big 10 where only six out of the now 14 schools participate. There may be some growth here and it will be in large part be driven by the financial resources of the conference in general. Hockey is a great sport, but it is not cheap and Title IX immediately comes into play. There are schools in the Big 10 that have a rich hockey tradition very similar to UND. How that tradition will impact expansion to the other 8 schools remains to be seen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted June 9, 2014 Share Posted June 9, 2014 http://www.grandforksherald.com/content/und-sports-reason-optimism-upcoming-big-sky-conference-participation UND SPORTS: Reason for optimism in upcoming Big Sky conference participation “I have no question in my mind that they will do what they need to do to get there,” Fullerton said. “That’s the kind of institution they are. They’re the lead institution of the state. They’ll get there. I have great faith that that is true.” 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.