Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted

What are the best frozen four sites for those of you that have attended a bunch?

 

the ones I usually hear as favorites:

- Boston 

- St. Paul 

- Tampa 

not sure how Vegas compares. Of course the frozen four has also been in Detroit, St Louis, Philly, Washington DC, Buffalo, Chicago, Pittsburgh, Denver, Milwaukee, Columbus, Albany, LA area to name a few.

Posted
Just now, cberkas said:

The Anaheim is one I remember being bad. Buffalo is not high on the list to have the Frozen Four again. 

I have been to Providence, Milwaukee twice, St. Paul, Detroit twice St. Louis, Anaheim, Denver, Columbus, Washington D.C. and Tampa. My top 3 are:

1. Tampa

2. Milwaukee

3. Tie between Detroit and St. Paul

  • Upvote 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, hawksfan12 said:

What are the best frozen four sites for those of you that have attended a bunch?

 

the ones I usually hear as favorites:

- Boston 

- St. Paul 

- Tampa 

not sure how Vegas compares. Of course the frozen four has also been in Detroit, St Louis, Philly, Washington DC, Buffalo, Chicago, Pittsburgh, Denver, Milwaukee, Columbus, Albany, LA area to name a few.

I've been to 3. 

I would rank them

1.Vegas

2.Tampa

3. St Paul

I don't care to go to St Paul again. It might be because i've been to St Paul way to many time to count and there is nothing new about it.  Vegas was by far the best.  

Posted
4 minutes ago, Big Green said:

I've been to 3. 

I would rank them

1.Vegas

2.Tampa

3. St Paul

I don't care to go to St Paul again. It might be because i've been to St Paul way to many time to count and there is nothing new about it.  Vegas was by far the best.  

imo to be considered...warm and safe

st paul

Posted
16 minutes ago, forksandspoons said:

I think some cool future sites would be: 

- Ft Lauderdale 

- Nashville

- Raleigh 

 

They don’t want to host the Frozen Four 

Posted
21 minutes ago, cberkas said:

They don’t want to host the Frozen Four 

Really?  That's a shame.  I've long thought of them as one of the best spots to host.

Posted
1 minute ago, Dustin said:

Really?  That's a shame.  I've long thought of them as one of the best spots to host.

Also, Nashville's location is easily accessible to a high majority of college hockey campuses.

  • Like 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Dustin said:

Really?  That's a shame.  I've long thought of them as one of the best spots to host.

I was surprised to hear it too.

Not surprised when I heard Buffalo is basically last on the list. 

Posted

Don't be surprised if Seattle bids now that Vegas hosted. Tough to get to for most fans, but hosting in WHL territory would be bold. Early April in the PNW is hit or miss for weather, but if it's nice and the cherry blossoms are still out at UW there's potential.

  • Like 1
Posted

Seattle would be sneaky fun IMO

Really walkable city. You can stay downtown and walk anywhere for the whole weekend more or less.

Not to mention if you're into the outdoors you can use Friday as a day dedicated for hiking.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, atxsioux said:

Seattle would be sneaky fun IMO

Really walkable city. You can stay downtown and walk anywhere for the whole weekend more or less.

Not to mention if you're into the outdoors you can use Friday as a day dedicated for hiking.

little trip to mount ranier...!!!!

Posted

Frozen Four cities I have been to: Boston, Tampa twice, and Vegas. They are so interchangeable on strengths and downsides. I like the option of Frozen Fours being in cities that I may not other visit if it wasn't for Frozen Fours being there to explore new places, but also have some built in plans. The downside of St. Paul is how many times I have been to Minneapolis/St. Paul in my life, but the perk of not having to fly is a nice upside for cost savings. I like going to Vegas every 3-5 years, whether for hockey purposes or not, so I wouldn't complain about keeping Vegas in a rotation. 

Posted
2 hours ago, siouxfaninseattle said:

Tampa is my favorite 😁. I liked Boston and Denver. Philly and St. Paul not so much. Chicago not so much either - not much stuff near the arena. Nashville would be great.

For what it's worth I think they are trying to develop that area finally around the united center in Chicago. So in the next 5-10 years it should be a better setup surrounding the arena.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...