Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Kick out Summit League members if they go 1a in football


Kick out Summit members if they go 1a in football  

48 members have voted

  1. 1. Kick out Summit League members if they go 1a in Football?



Recommended Posts

Posted

Don’t know why bison fans seem to need to post crap on UND sight 

‘one thing to read Sioux sports but silence is golden 

but then again I’m hardcore anti bison

  • Upvote 1
Posted
1 hour ago, SIOUXFAN97 said:

1 east team...yeah not ideal...but this time they get flagship und...sodaks...twin cities market and omaha.....

big difference.

have fun with augie and st cloud fillin' up the bomb shelter

Are you schizophrenic by chance? 

Posted
18 minutes ago, SIOUXFAN97 said:

are you bi polar by any chance....

Not to my knowledge. But im not posting about flagships, the Twin Cities, or Omaha as it pertains to UND, SDSU, and USD joining the Big Sky.

Posted
4 minutes ago, JohnboyND7 said:

Not to my knowledge. But im not posting about flagships, the Twin Cities, or Omaha as it pertains to UND, SDSU, and USD joining the Big Sky.

once again...summit is on life support even before the ndac did this....what's their fallback?  those above schools COULD move the bsc....und's been there before ....usd bitched out like normal back then....they/us might still be there if usd had some balls

Posted
34 minutes ago, Kab said:

Don’t know why bison fans seem to need to post crap on UND sight 

‘one thing to read Sioux sports but silence is golden 

but then again I’m hardcore anti bison

We have a couple of UND fans that come to BV.   But if you want to keep your echo chamber intact you can make it private.

Posted
1 minute ago, fightingsioux4life said:

Shouldn't you focus on your own issues? Like where you will get the money to fund a large annual increase in your FB budget?

No.  Im not worried about it.

Posted
Just now, fightingsioux4life said:

Shouldn't you focus on your own issues? Like where you will get the money to fund a large annual increase in your FB budget?

I dont need to get money for football. NDSU does. They'll figure it out or they won't. Nothing I do will have any impact on that. 

Posted
1 hour ago, SIOUXFAN97 said:

if the above move to a different conference or ndac is kicked out...what's the plan?  just throw a few out there..i'm really curious.

Summit didnt have have FB so we didnt leave them.  So there is no reason to even think they would have an issue .

Posted
2 minutes ago, bison73 said:

Summit didnt have have FB so we didnt leave them.  So there is no reason to even think they would have an issue .

doesn't mean the dak3 couldn't go somewhere else.....without the ac

Posted
39 minutes ago, bison73 said:

Summit didnt have have FB so we didnt leave them.  So there is no reason to even think they would have an issue .

NDSU is already talking about leaving the summit.... How is that not an issue?

  • Upvote 3
Posted
22 hours ago, cowboys5xsbs said:

NDSU is already talking about leaving the summit.... How is that not an issue?

The  schools in the MVFC and the big sky and the summit that have interest in not being left behind need to do what’s in their best interest.. anybody that thinks the bison wouldn’t leave the summit in 30 seconds if they got a better offer is delusional.  They already included wording in theMVC contract that says they will be the first invited to apply full member.. 

i happen to like the idea of a summit / big sky / MVFC full sport conference.. mont, mont state / und / sdsu / usd / st Thomas / Idaho / Idaho st / Weber state / 

I’m sure I’m missing a few.. but it’s fun to think about.. and then could move up as a group to whatever becomes of ncaa d1

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 2
Posted
6 minutes ago, wheelsup said:

The  schools in the MVFC and the big sky and the summit that have interest in not being left behind need to do what’s in their best interest.. anybody that thinks the bison wouldn’t leave the summit in 30 seconds if they got a better offer is delusional.  They already included wording in theMVC contract that says they will be the first invited to apply full member.. 

i happen to like the idea of a summit / big sky / MVFC full sport conference.. mont, mont state / und / sdsu / usd / st Thomas / Idaho / Idaho st / Weber state / 

I’m sure I’m missing a few.. but it’s fun to think about.. and then could move up as a group to whatever becomes of ncaa d1

vote!

Posted
13 minutes ago, wheelsup said:

i happen to like the idea of a summit / big sky / MVFC full sport conference.. mont, mont state / und / sdsu / usd / st Thomas / Idaho / Idaho st / Weber state / 

I’m sure I’m missing a few.. but it’s fun to think about.. and then could move up as a group to whatever becomes of ncaa d1

*As new members on a division of Conference USA*

Doesn't have to happen this year or next, but the planning should start. Get everyone on the same page. I cannot think of who says no (I'm including current members of Conf USA). 

  • Like 2
  • Upvote 1
Posted
1 hour ago, wheelsup said:

They already included wording in theMVC contract that says they will be the first invited to apply full member.. 

The language means nothing. They would be invited to apply for full membership with no promises of being accepted.
UC-Davis has the exact same language when they joined for all sports outside of football. Their contract said if the league expanded football membership, they would be the first time invited to apply but had no guarantees. So either they weren't ready, the MWC didn't want them for football or they weren't willing to pay the ransom that NDST was.

This doesn't mean that they wouldn't be accepted, however the language in the contract guarantees nothing.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, jdub27 said:

The language means nothing. They would be invited to apply for full membership with no promises of being accepted.
UC-Davis has the exact same language when they joined for all sports outside of football. Their contract said if the league expanded football membership, they would be the first time invited to apply but had no guarantees. So either they weren't ready, the MWC didn't want them for football or they weren't willing to pay the ransom that NDST was.

This doesn't mean that they wouldn't be accepted, however the language in the contract guarantees nothing.

To be clear .. whether their application is successful or not is not the point.. 

the point is that they have language looking for a different option.. why should UND and others sit around and hope.. when your wife tells you she wants to date other guys you should believe her 😀.. not hope she will stick around after nobody else wants her. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...