sioux rube Posted Wednesday at 03:39 AM Posted Wednesday at 03:39 AM Now we get one for some reason Quote
brianvf Posted Wednesday at 03:39 AM Posted Wednesday at 03:39 AM Just now, sioux rube said: Now we get one for some reason Delay of game? Is that what they said? Quote
cberkas Posted Wednesday at 03:39 AM Posted Wednesday at 03:39 AM I feel they just gave USA a penalty just because. Quote
sioux rube Posted Wednesday at 03:40 AM Posted Wednesday at 03:40 AM Just now, brianvf said: Delay of game? Is that what they said? Yes but how? Quote
SiouxFan100 Posted Wednesday at 03:41 AM Posted Wednesday at 03:41 AM Always a happy day when USA beats Canada 1 Quote
BigGreyAnt41 Posted Wednesday at 03:42 AM Posted Wednesday at 03:42 AM So confused why this is 6-on-5 instead of 5-on-4. Quote
brianvf Posted Wednesday at 03:44 AM Posted Wednesday at 03:44 AM Wow what a bad giveaway by Canada in their own zone. Quote
sioux rube Posted Wednesday at 03:45 AM Posted Wednesday at 03:45 AM Give credit to Augustine. He showed up tonight 1 Quote
cberkas Posted Wednesday at 03:45 AM Posted Wednesday at 03:45 AM 1 minute ago, BigGreyAnt41 said: So confused why this is 6-on-5 instead of 5-on-4. They felt "sorry" (in Canadian) for Canada and gave the US a penalty Quote
sioux rube Posted Wednesday at 03:46 AM Posted Wednesday at 03:46 AM 2 minutes ago, brianvf said: Wow what a bad giveaway by Canada in their own zone. That was a peewee mistake. Blindly throw it in the offensive slot Quote
BigGreyAnt41 Posted Wednesday at 03:51 AM Posted Wednesday at 03:51 AM 2 minutes ago, cberkas said: They felt "sorry" (in Canadian) for Canada and gave the US a penalty Yeah, I guess I didn’t know unrelated penalties like those could be “coincidentals”, so I assumed it would lead to 4-on-4 (if the goalie was in net). I thought only matching roughing penalties, or the like, would keep teams 5-on-5. Quote
cberkas Posted Wednesday at 03:53 AM Posted Wednesday at 03:53 AM 6 minutes ago, BigGreyAnt41 said: Yeah, I guess I didn’t know unrelated penalties like those could be “coincidentals”, so I assumed it would lead to 4-on-4 (if the goalie was in net). I thought only matching roughing penalties, or the like, would keep teams 5-on-5. Probably should have been a 5x4 but who knows why they did 6x5 Quote
petey23 Posted Wednesday at 03:54 AM Posted Wednesday at 03:54 AM 13 minutes ago, sioux rube said: Yes but how? We had already been warned twice for late substitutions, and they were taking too long trying to figure out which d man to use to replace a forward on the power play. Quote
SiouxBoys Posted Wednesday at 03:57 AM Posted Wednesday at 03:57 AM 14 minutes ago, BigGreyAnt41 said: So confused why this is 6-on-5 instead of 5-on-4. Coincidental penalties Quote
Wilbur Posted Wednesday at 04:02 AM Posted Wednesday at 04:02 AM Canada with some immature penalties in this one. International hockey boys, anything to the head is going to get called to a fault. Good to see Augustine show up and play with some swagger. He was solid. Now it's the Swiss on Thursday. Quote
cberkas Posted Wednesday at 04:03 AM Posted Wednesday at 04:03 AM I could see who ever plays Canada getting them into penalty trouble Quote
sioux rube Posted Wednesday at 04:03 AM Posted Wednesday at 04:03 AM 9 minutes ago, petey23 said: We had already been warned twice for late substitutions, and they were taking too long trying to figure out which d man to use to replace a forward on the power play. Thanks Quote
LuvHockey Posted Wednesday at 04:05 AM Posted Wednesday at 04:05 AM Still can’t believe Canada hate of US. When we were doormats not a big deal. Now that we compete you’d think we were Russia. I cannot root for them anymore due to the hate factor. Quote
Wilbur Posted Wednesday at 04:08 AM Posted Wednesday at 04:08 AM 2 minutes ago, LuvHockey said: Still can’t believe Canada hate of US. When we were doormats not a big deal. Now that we compete you’d think we were Russia. I cannot root for them anymore due to the hate factor. I get why they aren't there, but I miss Russia being there....I do. Quote
cberkas Posted Wednesday at 04:12 AM Posted Wednesday at 04:12 AM 3 minutes ago, Wilbur said: I get why they aren't there, but I miss Russia being there....I do. I'm surprised Russians didn't try to say they were from Kazakhstan Quote
Wilbur Posted Wednesday at 04:15 AM Posted Wednesday at 04:15 AM So playoff rankings. This is for reseading purposes after the quarters. 1. Sweden 2. USA 3. Czechia 4. Finland 5. Canada 6. Slovakia 7. Latvia 8. Swiss Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.