Smoggy Posted April 12, 2018 Share Posted April 12, 2018 Surprised no one has posted anything. Looks like we added 2 players. Found a big in 6'10" from Cali. Plenty of hoop heads out there. What are the thoughts? und sports article Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ND-fan Posted April 18, 2018 Share Posted April 18, 2018 Jeff Kolpack article in Forum looks like all mid-major programs are in for quite a shake up if the NCAA changes the rule on sitting out for the next year in college sports. We could see where teams will become the feeder program for the top major program conferences very unlikely that mid majors will keep a player more than two years if they are star quality talent. If this occurs they may have to start subdivision in division 1 basketball and other sports as well. We could see where there is only top 75 to 100 schools for division 1 and we will have division between division 1 and 2.How all this shakes out is going to be interesting what it will mean for college sports and how revenue shakes out with these changes. I could see where colleges change how players and schools may get to compensation contract where if school provides enough incentives the player signs a contract to play for so many years where both sides are bound to this contract. I think the days where schools and coaches had all the power where player had to perform or were cut without any compensation is long gone. The transition between where we are now and getting to compensation package is going to take some time and is going to require more from coaching and administrations to sign and retain players. Also I believe the one done athlete may be to the end to where they will just let these players go to NBA and college will be signing players that will need to play college basketball for number of years before they go on to the NBA or professional basketball or just get an education. I believe we are entering where college athletes are going to be compensated while they are playing for colleges at least in upper divisions. The days where colleges created revenue streams off these athletes with very little compensation is coming to an end and probably should have happen some time ago. All this is going to change structure of college sports and how everyone connected is compensated in the future. Athletes are going to be getting bigger pot of pie, schools less, and I believe also coaches too where multi million dollar contracts could also disappear. Also how schools structure themselves who they play will probably will be in play also. These are just my thoughts on this but I do think the times are really changing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UND Fan Posted May 1, 2018 Author Share Posted May 1, 2018 On 3/22/2018 at 8:45 PM, teamsioux said: Currently has at least nine offers according to VC. Kuljuhovic will play at CS-Fullerton. This should have been listed under 17-18 Recruiting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UND Fan Posted May 2, 2018 Author Share Posted May 2, 2018 New offer: SF Riley Grigsby, 6'6“, 210, San Jose (Archbishop Mitty), CA Has offer from Presbyterian Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWSiouxMN Posted May 2, 2018 Share Posted May 2, 2018 Has Cali replaced Iowa for a recruiting hotbed? <jest> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ND1 Posted May 2, 2018 Share Posted May 2, 2018 Saw NDSU and many other coaches at the recent big Prep Hoops aau tournament in Minneapolis this past weekend, no UND though. 20 of the top 25 MN kids were playing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UND Fan Posted June 6, 2018 Author Share Posted June 6, 2018 On 5/1/2018 at 8:55 PM, UND Fan said: New offer: SF Riley Grigsby, 6'6“, 210, San Jose (Archbishop Mitty), CA Has offer from Presbyterian Grigsby will attend Seattle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nodak651 Posted June 6, 2018 Share Posted June 6, 2018 On 4/18/2018 at 5:56 PM, ND-fan said: Jeff Kolpack article in Forum looks like all mid-major programs are in for quite a shake up if the NCAA changes the rule on sitting out for the next year in college sports. We could see where teams will become the feeder program for the top major program conferences very unlikely that mid majors will keep a player more than two years if they are star quality talent. If this occurs they may have to start subdivision in division 1 basketball and other sports as well. We could see where there is only top 75 to 100 schools for division 1 and we will have division between division 1 and 2.How all this shakes out is going to be interesting what it will mean for college sports and how revenue shakes out with these changes. I could see where colleges change how players and schools may get to compensation contract where if school provides enough incentives the player signs a contract to play for so many years where both sides are bound to this contract. I think the days where schools and coaches had all the power where player had to perform or were cut without any compensation is long gone. The transition between where we are now and getting to compensation package is going to take some time and is going to require more from coaching and administrations to sign and retain players. Also I believe the one done athlete may be to the end to where they will just let these players go to NBA and college will be signing players that will need to play college basketball for number of years before they go on to the NBA or professional basketball or just get an education. I believe we are entering where college athletes are going to be compensated while they are playing for colleges at least in upper divisions. The days where colleges created revenue streams off these athletes with very little compensation is coming to an end and probably should have happen some time ago. All this is going to change structure of college sports and how everyone connected is compensated in the future. Athletes are going to be getting bigger pot of pie, schools less, and I believe also coaches too where multi million dollar contracts could also disappear. Also how schools structure themselves who they play will probably will be in play also. These are just my thoughts on this but I do think the times are really changing. This sounds more and more like an employer - employee relationship. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UND Fan Posted June 11, 2018 Author Share Posted June 11, 2018 On 5/9/2017 at 10:19 PM, SWSiouxMN said: Here is another offer: DLS PG Tyrell Terry 5'11 160 Terry will attend Stanford. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UND Fan Posted June 17, 2018 Author Share Posted June 17, 2018 On 7/23/2017 at 10:07 PM, UNDBIZ said: Moore will play at Toledo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiouxVolley Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 According to this, South Alabama and Minnesota may offer Tyreke Locure. https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/sports/high-school/recruiting/2018/06/18/des-moines-iowa-north-high-tyreke-locure-official-visit-south-alabama-july-georgia-tech-minnesota/710474002/ Locure was originally from New Orleans. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UND Fan Posted June 24, 2018 Author Share Posted June 24, 2018 On 5/4/2017 at 3:25 PM, UND Fan said: Another: PG Tyreke Locure, 5'10", Des Moines (North), IA First offer - scored 26/game as a sophomore!! First team 4A all-state! Locure will attend South Alabama. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UNDBIZ Posted July 24, 2018 Share Posted July 24, 2018 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UNDBIZ Posted July 24, 2018 Share Posted July 24, 2018 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UNDBIZ Posted July 24, 2018 Share Posted July 24, 2018 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teamsioux Posted July 24, 2018 Share Posted July 24, 2018 7 minutes ago, UNDBIZ said: Also has offer from SDSU. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UND Fan Posted July 24, 2018 Author Share Posted July 24, 2018 pA busy day - along with Wilson and Barisic, there were two other offers: PF Wilson - 6'7", 210, a graduate of Hoover HS in IA, he started all 30 games and averaged 14 & 6 as a freshman at Kirkwood CC. Shot 69% from the field (outstanding) and 46% from the line (not outstanding!). Has offer from SDSU. PF Barisic - 6'9", from Croatia. Played his freshman year at Highland CC in IL. Unable to find any stats. Has offers from NIU, WIU, Jacksonville St, UTSA, SF Austin & UNC-Ashville. SG Nicolas Elame - 6'3", 185 from France. Playing at Villa Vista Prep in AZ. It appears he averaged about 15 points last year. Has offers from SUU, UTEP, Fresno St & UCSB. PF Tim Adetukasi, 6'6", 220, from the UK. Played for a HS in CA last year. It appears he will play at Greenwood Christian Academy in IN this year. No known offers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiouxVolley Posted July 24, 2018 Share Posted July 24, 2018 Always thought that a major foreign presence was needed for mbb, but it seems the elder fan base is rebelling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UND Fan Posted July 24, 2018 Author Share Posted July 24, 2018 5 hours ago, SiouxVolley said: Always thought that a major foreign presence was needed for mbb, but it seems the elder fan base is rebelling. I am probably one of those "elders" and I am not rebelling. However, I hope we don't go overboard with too many. We don't want the reputation of being an "international BB school". Others have gotten that reputation and it has made it harder to recruit HS kids. As others have pointed out, we need to figure how to recruit MN kids. Having no MN players on scholarship is unbelievable! I am not going to do the research but I bet that has never happened before. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siouxfan512 Posted July 24, 2018 Share Posted July 24, 2018 17 minutes ago, UND Fan said: I am probably one of those "elders" and I am not rebelling. However, I hope we don't go overboard with too many. We don't want the reputation of being an "international BB school". Others have gotten that reputation and it has made it harder to recruit HS kids. As others have pointed out, we need to figure how to recruit MN kids. Having no MN players on scholarship is unbelievable! I am not going to do the research but I bet that has never happened before. Recruit MN? Preposterous! I mean Crandall and Hooker were ok I guess. But MN, seriously? (Please note the sarcasm) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWSiouxMN Posted July 24, 2018 Share Posted July 24, 2018 1 hour ago, siouxfan512 said: Recruit MN? Preposterous! I mean Crandall and Hooker were ok I guess. But MN, seriously? (Please note the sarcasm) I mean its not like they have a former player running one of the better programs in the state that Jones couldn't reach out to...….. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fightingsioux4life Posted July 24, 2018 Share Posted July 24, 2018 On 4/18/2018 at 5:56 PM, ND-fan said: Jeff Kolpack article in Forum looks like all mid-major programs are in for quite a shake up if the NCAA changes the rule on sitting out for the next year in college sports. We could see where teams will become the feeder program for the top major program conferences very unlikely that mid majors will keep a player more than two years if they are star quality talent. If this occurs they may have to start subdivision in division 1 basketball and other sports as well. We could see where there is only top 75 to 100 schools for division 1 and we will have division between division 1 and 2.How all this shakes out is going to be interesting what it will mean for college sports and how revenue shakes out with these changes. I could see where colleges change how players and schools may get to compensation contract where if school provides enough incentives the player signs a contract to play for so many years where both sides are bound to this contract. I think the days where schools and coaches had all the power where player had to perform or were cut without any compensation is long gone. The transition between where we are now and getting to compensation package is going to take some time and is going to require more from coaching and administrations to sign and retain players. Also I believe the one done athlete may be to the end to where they will just let these players go to NBA and college will be signing players that will need to play college basketball for number of years before they go on to the NBA or professional basketball or just get an education. I believe we are entering where college athletes are going to be compensated while they are playing for colleges at least in upper divisions. The days where colleges created revenue streams off these athletes with very little compensation is coming to an end and probably should have happen some time ago. All this is going to change structure of college sports and how everyone connected is compensated in the future. Athletes are going to be getting bigger pot of pie, schools less, and I believe also coaches too where multi million dollar contracts could also disappear. Also how schools structure themselves who they play will probably will be in play also. These are just my thoughts on this but I do think the times are really changing. I guess if you can't beat the mid-majors in the NCAA tournament, rig the system against them. Why don't they just create an "FCS" for basketball and be done with it? SMH Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWSiouxMN Posted July 24, 2018 Share Posted July 24, 2018 16 minutes ago, fightingsioux4life said: I guess if you can't beat the mid-majors in the NCAA tournament, rig the system against them. Why don't they just create an "FCS" for basketball and be done with it? SMH Because they don't want to kill the golden goose which is March Madness. And why would the mid-majors accept that when they know they get this kind of impact when they pull upsets. This right here is why UND, as much as I love the FB program, needs to emphasize basketball more. https://sports.yahoo.com/publicity-umbcs-upset-generated-worth-staggering-amount-money-054324907.html The NCAA will never admit it, but they love when the upset happens. I'm not ready to say this is a negative because this is a 2 way street. Imagine the year that UND went to the NCAAs, and with Marlon involved, wouldn't that have been a better team? Imagine Nash playing right away with Huff and company? Maybe they get to the dance a few years early? Mid-majors will be fine, they will adapt and find a way around and beat the system. The one-and-done rule didn't kill the mid-majors, this won't either. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nodak651 Posted July 24, 2018 Share Posted July 24, 2018 24 minutes ago, SWSiouxMN said: Because they don't want to kill the golden goose which is March Madness. And why would the mid-majors accept that when they know they get this kind of impact when they pull upsets. This right here is why UND, as much as I love the FB program, needs to emphasize basketball more. https://sports.yahoo.com/publicity-umbcs-upset-generated-worth-staggering-amount-money-054324907.html The NCAA will never admit it, but they love when the upset happens. I'm not ready to say this is a negative because this is a 2 way street. Imagine the year that UND went to the NCAAs, and with Marlon involved, wouldn't that have been a better team? Imagine Nash playing right away with Huff and company? Maybe they get to the dance a few years early? Mid-majors will be fine, they will adapt and find a way around and beat the system. The one-and-done rule didn't kill the mid-majors, this won't either. Butt would Huff have stayed? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fightingsioux4life Posted July 24, 2018 Share Posted July 24, 2018 28 minutes ago, SWSiouxMN said: Because they don't want to kill the golden goose which is March Madness. And why would the mid-majors accept that when they know they get this kind of impact when they pull upsets. This right here is why UND, as much as I love the FB program, needs to emphasize basketball more. https://sports.yahoo.com/publicity-umbcs-upset-generated-worth-staggering-amount-money-054324907.html The NCAA will never admit it, but they love when the upset happens. I'm not ready to say this is a negative because this is a 2 way street. Imagine the year that UND went to the NCAAs, and with Marlon involved, wouldn't that have been a better team? Imagine Nash playing right away with Huff and company? Maybe they get to the dance a few years early? Mid-majors will be fine, they will adapt and find a way around and beat the system. The one-and-done rule didn't kill the mid-majors, this won't either. I was being sarcastic about the "FCS" for basketball. I hope you are right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.