Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

2014-2015 NHL Season


MafiaMan

Recommended Posts

so much for the coming out and playing with desperation attitude from the blackhawks.  a mind numbing 6 shots that period.  whew.  I hope they didn't tire themselves out too early.  ducks have to be jumping for joy after weathering that storm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so much for the coming out and playing with desperation attitude from the blackhawks.  a mind numbing 6 shots that period.  whew.  I hope they didn't tire themselves out too early.  ducks have to be jumping for joy after weathering that storm.

Obviously they were toying with them.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anaheim looked tired during the last two periods. Their top forward lines have logged a lot more ice time than Chicago....

* Getzlaf has logged 149 minutes so far, 10 more than any of Chicago's forwards.   

* Meanwhile, Chicago's bottom 6 forwards have taken 60 minutes more than Anaheim's bottom 6.

 

Anaheim's hitting is way down ... Another sign of tired legs.

For example in Game 6:   Kane took 0 hits from Anaheim.   Hossa wasn't hit.   Toews took just 1.   Keith 3, Seabrook 2.    

 

Bottom line, the extra day of rest may neutralize this - but it seems to me that Anaheim is showing signs of wear more than Chicago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stoner makes it 3-2.

Surprised nobody commented about this, but Stoner's goal should not have counted due to goalie interference by Silfverberg. As Crawford put his glove up to catch the puck, Silfverberg ran into his glove, moving it so he couldn't catch the puck.

I'm not sure why they didn't review that. Or why Crawford didn't make a bigger deal about it. He yelled a bit to the the after the goal, but I'd have thought he would have gone apeshit after that to make his point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surprised nobody commented about this, but Stoner's goal should not have counted due to goalie interference by Silfverberg. As Crawford put his glove up to catch the puck, Silfverberg ran into his glove, moving it so he couldn't catch the puck.

I'm not sure why they didn't review that. Or why Crawford didn't make a bigger deal about it. He yelled a bit to the the after the goal, but I'd have thought he would have gone apeshit after that to make his point.

I would love to hear what Toronto was thinking ... Why it was allowed to stand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surprised nobody commented about this, but Stoner's goal should not have counted due to goalie interference by Silfverberg. As Crawford put his glove up to catch the puck, Silfverberg ran into his glove, moving it so he couldn't catch the puck.

I'm not sure why they didn't review that. Or why Crawford didn't make a bigger deal about it. He yelled a bit to the the after the goal, but I'd have thought he would have gone apeshit after that to make his point.

What was ironic about it was the Hawks got called for goalie interference a minute later.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both game 7's, been a lot better playoffs than the duds the NBA Conference Finals have been.

 

 

People watch the NBA. Who knew.

Only the third time in playoff history where both conference finals are going to a game 7.

 

What is this ehn-bee-yay of which you speak? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...