Cratter Posted Friday at 04:58 PM Posted Friday at 04:58 PM 3 hours ago, jdub27 said: Any developer who sees 80% occupancy and thinks one or two more need buildings need to be built is going to go broke real fast. Lol..ok here a more expanded answer...in this scenario its a new building, its 80% full after only being open x amount of time.....which gives them an "estimated capacity fill rate"...they dont start planning the next one at 100% full. And in this virtual scenario, at 80% gives them enough green light data... Of course a lot of factors into "fill rate." And "80%" in a vacuum means squat. "We kept prices high earlier because we figured we could always lower them later to fill it." Quote
jdub27 Posted Friday at 05:21 PM Posted Friday at 05:21 PM 20 minutes ago, Cratter said: Lol..ok here a more expanded answer...in this scenario its a new building, its 80% full after only being open x amount of time.....which gives them an "estimated capacity fill rate"...they dont start planning the next one at 100% full. And in this virtual scenario, at 80% gives them enough green light data... Of course a lot of factors into "fill rate." And "80%" in a vacuum means squat. "We kept prices high earlier because we figured we could always lower them later to fill it." If the building isn't significantly leased up prior to opening and then at above a break-even rate (which is almost always quite a bit higher than 80%) the first few months its open, they are in a lot of trouble. If you're discounting leases early in the process, also a huge red flag. Existing tenants aren't a big fan of seeing that... Not saying they don't offer some early-lease up specials (first and last month free, etc.) but what you're describing isn't how the process works at all. 1 Quote
Cratter Posted Friday at 05:22 PM Posted Friday at 05:22 PM I love this thread. Hop in the "way back machine" To see: "Grand Forks very slow growth.....we dont need to build so many new apartments." *digs deep* "Holy crap. Grand Forks has a very low vacancy rate and apartments growth hasnt been keeping up with demand; we need to built a lot more!" Quote
Cratter Posted Friday at 05:43 PM Posted Friday at 05:43 PM 22 minutes ago, jdub27 said: If the building isn't significantly leased up prior to opening and then at above a break-even rate (which is almost always quite a bit higher than 80%) the first few months its open, they are in a lot of trouble. If you're discounting leases early in the process, also a huge red flag. Existing tenants aren't a big fan of seeing that... Not saying they don't offer some early-lease up specials (first and last month free, etc.) but what you're describing isn't how the process works at all. Ok good to know. We can use this data to answer Blackhearts question then,....the original point: it'll likely be 90% to 100% full before it opens or right afterwards. 1 Quote
Blackheart Posted Friday at 06:07 PM Posted Friday at 06:07 PM 14 hours ago, Cratter said: Yeah also color me shocked a golf simulator owner is against a year round "Top Golf style." Which nearly every Grand Forks resident would love to have. Catch me up on this one...the guy that runs the golf simulator wasn't thrilled that the city was offering tax breaks to his potential competition? 1 Quote
jdub27 Posted Friday at 06:38 PM Posted Friday at 06:38 PM 30 minutes ago, Blackheart said: Catch me up on this one...the guy that runs the golf simulator wasn't thrilled that the city was offering tax breaks to his potential competition? If you consider a golf simulator put in as an amenity in an apartment building, yes. 1 Quote
Cratter Posted Friday at 06:45 PM Posted Friday at 06:45 PM 2 hours ago, Blackheart said: Catch me up on this one...the guy that runs the golf simulator wasn't thrilled that the city was offering tax breaks to his potential competition? The poker table buy in is $10 million minimum. The more you invest the bigger discount/perks you get. This guy gets comped a soda: This guy gets comped a penthouse suite: Quote
Blackheart Posted Friday at 06:46 PM Posted Friday at 06:46 PM 1 minute ago, jdub27 said: If you consider a golf simulator put in as an amenity in an apartment building, yes. The new developments will be using TIF funds then? If so, is there any concern that the amenities provided (such as a golf simulator) will unfairly impact local business(es)? Sorry if I'm slow on this... Quote
Cratter Posted Friday at 07:14 PM Posted Friday at 07:14 PM 35 minutes ago, jdub27 said: If you consider a golf simulator put in as an amenity in an apartment building, yes. Which begs the "question," Megan Ashley Pierce (MAP Fitness) Really needs to step up her city council game. Quote
jdub27 Posted Friday at 07:23 PM Posted Friday at 07:23 PM 35 minutes ago, Blackheart said: The new developments will be using TIF funds then? If so, is there any concern that the amenities provided (such as a golf simulator) will unfairly impact local business(es)? Sorry if I'm slow on this... From what I understand, they are applying for a TIF (which is a tax deferment, not actual cash). 7 minutes ago, Cratter said: Which begs the "question," Megan Ashley Pierce (MAP Fitness) Really needs to step up her city council game. I've heard similar arguments as it relates to the city owned Choice Health and Fitness. Quote
Blackheart Posted Friday at 07:24 PM Posted Friday at 07:24 PM 32 minutes ago, Cratter said: The poker table buy in is $10 million minimum. The more you invest the bigger discount you get. This guy gets comped a soda: This guy gets comped a penthouse suite: I get the risk/reward portion of this; the more you put in the more you stand to gain. (or lose) But if I'm the guy getting comped a soda, I sure don't want to see my property tax increase for additional infrastructure to support Mr Penthouse Suite's fabulous new business. Maybe I'm just mad because I would have loved to have a 20 year tax break for my business. Quote
Blackheart Posted Friday at 07:25 PM Posted Friday at 07:25 PM 1 minute ago, jdub27 said: From what I understand, they are applying for a TIF (which is a tax deferment, not actual cash). Thanks for the clarification. Quote
Blackheart Posted Friday at 07:27 PM Posted Friday at 07:27 PM JDub27 and Cratter, why don't you guys just come over to my house and explain all this to me. The first couple rounds are on me. 1 Quote
Cratter Posted Friday at 07:28 PM Posted Friday at 07:28 PM 3 minutes ago, Blackheart said: I sure don't want to see my property tax increase for additional infrastructure to support Mr Penthouse Suite's fabulous new business. 1 Quote
Cratter Posted Friday at 07:44 PM Posted Friday at 07:44 PM "Cratter can you play the other side?" Sure. Property tax? Where's that money go? Biggest portion: public schools. Which is a valid concern and why the schools. Said "no way jose we love money." The only way you'll pay more is if the city decides to increase the "mill rate" (Besides naturally raising property values). Which is unlikely, because ND state and local governments seem to be lowering them. A good trivia question would be "When is the last time Grand Forks increased the mill rate?" People complain about property tax breaks but then vote to increase their own sales tax constantly in Grand Forks. 🫣 1 Quote
Cratter Posted Friday at 08:11 PM Posted Friday at 08:11 PM I stumbled across this nugget from tax commissioners office: This means Fargo's taxable sales and purchases dropped over six times more than Grand Forks’ during Q4 2024 compared to Q4 2023. 1 Quote
SIOUXFAN97 Posted yesterday at 01:17 AM Posted yesterday at 01:17 AM 5 hours ago, Cratter said: I stumbled across this nugget from tax commissioners office: This means Fargo's taxable sales and purchases dropped over six times more than Grand Forks’ during Q4 2024 compared to Q4 2023. oh boy...imperial cass is __________________________ 1 Quote
Oxbow6 Posted yesterday at 01:49 AM Posted yesterday at 01:49 AM 30 minutes ago, SIOUXFAN97 said: oh boy...imperial cass is __________________________ At this point I just want people to "stay off my lawn"! 1 Quote
Blackheart Posted yesterday at 03:12 AM Posted yesterday at 03:12 AM 1 hour ago, Oxbow6 said: At this point I just want people to "stay off my lawn"! I thought that was the Nextdoor app... Quote
Bison Dan Posted yesterday at 12:03 PM Posted yesterday at 12:03 PM 15 hours ago, Cratter said: I stumbled across this nugget from tax commissioners office: This means Fargo's taxable sales and purchases dropped over six times more than Grand Forks’ during Q4 2024 compared to Q4 2023. LOL Nice cherry picking 1 Quote
SIOUXFAN97 Posted yesterday at 02:03 PM Posted yesterday at 02:03 PM 1 hour ago, Bison Dan said: LOL Nice cherry picking Is he wrong? 2 Quote
Cratter Posted yesterday at 03:20 PM Posted yesterday at 03:20 PM Here's the link for anyone interested. https://www.tax.nd.gov/news/tax-commissioner-reports-modest-gain-2024-fourth-quarter-collections 2 Quote
SIOUXFAN97 Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago 1 hour ago, Cratter said: Here's the link for anyone interested. https://www.tax.nd.gov/news/tax-commissioner-reports-modest-gain-2024-fourth-quarter-collections is he wrong @Bison Dan ? 2 Quote
Bison Dan Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 19 hours ago, SIOUXFAN97 said: is he wrong @Bison Dan ? For that quarter no but over the last 10 years GF isn't even in the ball park. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.