Brim006 Posted July 15 Posted July 15 1 minute ago, forksandspoons said: Great post! Downtown and campus are crazy nice these days for sure. The new Altru Sports Complex (indoor turf, pool, pickleball, etc) and Children’s Museum will both be along interstate, helping spruce up that area a little and adding more amenities to the city. Holy smokes that is great, I hadn't heard about those yet, but GF is hitting the nail on the head with those additions, and a bonus of the location! 2 Quote
Kab Posted July 15 Posted July 15 You really don’t see a lot of the development in GF since it’s mostly on old highway 81, South Washington seems to be a lot of apartment buildings but single family homes need to be built. is home ownership important to the young families? west of town on south 32nd a few miles out are many new homes Quote
Brim006 Posted July 15 Posted July 15 4 minutes ago, Kab said: You really don’t see a lot of the development in GF since it’s mostly on old highway 81, South Washington seems to be a lot of apartment buildings but single family homes need to be built. is home ownership important to the young families? west of town on south 32nd a few miles out are many new homes Yeah, I was wondering how much those developments outside of town had grown since the south side alone wasn't much. And I would say yes, home ownership is still very important to young familes. Most young families who are a few years into their career and have young kids 1000% want to live in a single family home over an apartment. But it's typically a supply and demand topic, so judging off all the new apartments, and so few new single family homes, that's where my thought of most new residents being lower income most likely but maybe I'm wrong since I didnt get to see all the new building out of town in those other neighborhoods. Quote
Popular Post forksandspoons Posted Saturday at 03:37 AM Popular Post Posted Saturday at 03:37 AM $100 million to Grand Sky! Great for Grand Forks 7 Quote
KEH Posted yesterday at 01:45 AM Posted yesterday at 01:45 AM On 7/7/2025 at 6:40 PM, Cratter said: 1) Minot is 30 more miles away than GFK and Hector. 2) Minot is more remote and historically has a more transient population (Minot AFB personnel, oil workers.) 3) Bismarck doesn't have nearly as high as airline service as Hector, making it easier to add flights to that area. 4) "The west" has a higher flying culture because of distance and terrain? No easy drive to MSP like the east does for more flight and leisure options...GFK and Hector still have to compete with MSP for passengers which "the west" does not. Less lake cabin (culture) to go to like everyone seems to have in GFK and Fargo area for vacations? Grand Forks even has a city of about a million people a little over two hours to its north competing for its flights and entertainment dollars. https://www.kfyrtv.com/2025/07/19/williston-airport-adding-third-daily-flight-minneapolis/?utm_source=taboola&utm_medium=organicclicks&tbref=hp Williston will now have as many flights on Delta as GFK. GFK is 5th in regards to commercial daily flights, how is this acceptable for the county and city to keep the status quo? 2 Quote
SIOUXFAN97 Posted yesterday at 02:12 AM Posted yesterday at 02:12 AM 26 minutes ago, KEH said: https://www.kfyrtv.com/2025/07/19/williston-airport-adding-third-daily-flight-minneapolis/?utm_source=taboola&utm_medium=organicclicks&tbref=hp Williston will now have as many flights on Delta as GFK. GFK is 5th in regards to commercial daily flights, how is this acceptable for the county and city to keep the status quo? where's bo? 2 Quote
Cratter Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago 20 hours ago, KEH said: https://www.kfyrtv.com/2025/07/19/williston-airport-adding-third-daily-flight-minneapolis/?utm_source=taboola&utm_medium=organicclicks&tbref=hp Williston will now have as many flights on Delta as GFK. GFK is 5th in regards to commercial daily flights, how is this acceptable for the county and city to keep the status quo? Normally I would tell you about supply and demand. But in this case, the city of Williston is paying airlines to fly to their city. 1 Quote
KEH Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago 1 hour ago, Cratter said: Normally I would tell you about supply and demand. But in this case, the city of Williston is paying airlines to fly to their city. Since I have business degree from UND...I'll pass on your supply and demand lesson. Fargo is also paying airlines to fly to their city the authority minutes reflect that dating back 5 years or more. It is also kind of interesting that Mead & Hunt represents both Fargo and Grand Forks on consultation services. The pool for these consultants is small but isn't there a conflict of interest here? Fargo keeps getting the "wins", yeah there is more demand but at what point does the airport authority say "what we are doing isn't working"? From the outside it seems they are content with a pat ourselves on the back, "we are a Top 25 busiest tower" and "look at our new east/west crosswind runway." They got the small community air service grant which is great but SkyWest and United have yet to say, "we are coming" and time kills deals. 1 3 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.