RuBNcereal Posted March 26, 2011 Share Posted March 26, 2011 When the F*** did the refs have the ability to look at multiple camera angles?! ... busted bracket .... 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EAJsioux Posted March 26, 2011 Share Posted March 26, 2011 Yeah, I have never seen them look at anything other than the overhead replay. Bogus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luapsided Posted March 26, 2011 Share Posted March 26, 2011 I picked Michigan But anyways, was it called a goal initially? Not that that should matter if the replayed showed no clear view. Sounds like I'm 2-0 just like the refs so far... Not sure the total powerplays in the game but Duluth fought off nine powerplays themselves! So refs win that one as well, even though D Doggs get the win. I reflect and tend to like our refs way more in this stage of the hockey season. What a crock. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johndahl Posted March 26, 2011 Share Posted March 26, 2011 They've apparently changed the standard from "clearly crossed the goal line" to "coulda maybe sorta probably crossed the goal line if I had to guess, considering it's OT and I have dinner reservations". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuBNcereal Posted March 26, 2011 Author Share Posted March 26, 2011 They've apparently changed the standard from "clearly crossed the goal line" to "coulda maybe sorta probably crossed the goal line if I had to guess, considering it's OT and I have dinner reservations". Thats hilarious! No, luapsided. They goal was initially waved off and needed clear evidence to turn over Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oxbow6 Posted March 26, 2011 Share Posted March 26, 2011 Was Anderson or Shep reffing that game? Another completely blown call in college hockey...pathetic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oxbow6 Posted March 26, 2011 Share Posted March 26, 2011 Thats hilarious! No, luapsided. They goal was initially waved off and needed clear evidence to turn over Where was that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sprig Posted March 26, 2011 Share Posted March 26, 2011 Was Anderson or Shep reffing that game? Another completely blown call in college hockey...pathetic. The ESPNU commentators agree. That could not be overturned and called a goal, according to the rule. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Washburn Sioux Posted March 26, 2011 Share Posted March 26, 2011 UNO got hosed, that was bad. Deano will not be happy when he gets to finally see the replays. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Whistler Posted March 26, 2011 Share Posted March 26, 2011 I'm not 100% convinced that the replay showed conclusive evidence, but I believe it was a goal. Yeah, it's a tough way to lose a game if you're a UNO fan but imagine how upset you'd be if you were a Michigan fan and it had been ruled not a goal. Blais didn't argue much if at all, so that should tell you something. Duh, the rules say conclusive evidence. I don't see it in the net. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sioux14 Posted March 26, 2011 Share Posted March 26, 2011 Is anybody aware of a video clip on you tube or somewhere else of the "goal"? I missed it and would love to see it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swingen102 Posted March 26, 2011 Share Posted March 26, 2011 I'm not 100% convinced that the replay showed conclusive evidence, but I believe it was a goal. Yeah, it's a tough way to lose a game if you're a UNO fan but imagine how upset you'd be if you were a Michigan fan and it had been ruled not a goal. Blais didn't argue much if at all, so that should tell you something. Blais didn't argue because he hadn't seen the replay yet and must have given the refs the benefit of the doubt that they made the right call. Whoops.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YaneA Posted March 26, 2011 Share Posted March 26, 2011 Schlossman just tweeted that one of the refs in the UNO v Michigan crew is named "Dumas" The French pronunciation was used until a few moments ago, I reckon 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fetch Posted March 26, 2011 Share Posted March 26, 2011 not called a goal on the ice & not CONCLUSIVE on video = No Goal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whoosh Posted March 26, 2011 Share Posted March 26, 2011 With my high resolution super duper X-ray glasses....I think it "COULD" have gone in...maybe.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
und1goalie Posted March 26, 2011 Share Posted March 26, 2011 Imagine being a senior on Omaha. That is a terrible call and Blais should have climbed the wall like Gwozdecky. Ridiculous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiouxFanatic Posted March 26, 2011 Share Posted March 26, 2011 I'm not 100% convinced that the replay showed conclusive evidence, but I believe it was a goal. Yeah, it's a tough way to lose a game if you're a UNO fan but imagine how upset you'd be if you were a Michigan fan and it had been ruled not a goal. Blais didn't argue much if at all, so that should tell you something. erm, yeah to be honest I bet the Michigan fans could see why it was a no goal and what would blais arguing do? It wouldn't change the call. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vegas_Sioux Posted March 26, 2011 Share Posted March 26, 2011 Here are the refs from that Referees: Harry Dumas, Chip McDonald Assistant Referees: Gleen Cooke, Justin Prusak looks like ECAC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siouxzy Posted March 26, 2011 Share Posted March 26, 2011 When the F*** did the refs have the ability to look at multiple camera angles?! ... busted bracket .... I think the overhead only is a WCHA rule. The rest of college maybe believes in tech. I am waiting to see the video. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Whistler Posted March 26, 2011 Share Posted March 26, 2011 Like I said, the replay may not have been conclusive but I still believe it was a goal. I don't know if that makes it the right call, but I do know that I would be pissed if the Sioux were in the position Michigan was in and had it ruled no goal. That's pretty ignorant. There's no evidence that it was a goal and by the rules it is NOT a goal. Being pissed off over that would be highly stupid. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johndahl Posted March 26, 2011 Share Posted March 26, 2011 Like I said, the replay may not have been conclusive but I still believe it was a goal. I don't know if that makes it the right call. No it doesn't. As others have said, if it "may not have been conclusive" it's not a goal. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Whistler Posted March 26, 2011 Share Posted March 26, 2011 No it doesn't. As others have said, if it "may not have been conclusive" it's not a goal. Unless they can show a screenshot of the goal over the line then it was no goal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supertrex Posted March 26, 2011 Share Posted March 26, 2011 I didn't initially see it, but if you look at the replay, I think that might be the puck between the goalie's skate blades...there's a roundish black spot on the slow motion replay...then he moves his skates outward. When you see the puck coming back out and trace its line, it goes right to that spot. That might be what they are seeing...just my thoughts and I'm not saying I'm right...but that's what I see on the replay...they looked at it for 10 minutes so they must have seen something and finally concluded that it was the puck... In the meantime, CC is wiping up the ice with BC...go CC... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goon Posted March 26, 2011 Share Posted March 26, 2011 Like I said, the replay may not have been conclusive but I still believe it was a goal. I don't know if that makes it the right call, but I do know that I would be pissed if the Sioux were in the position Michigan was in and had it ruled no goal. But of course you would think that it's a goal, you must have oppositional defiance disorder or something. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jodcon Posted March 26, 2011 Share Posted March 26, 2011 Unless they can show a screenshot of the goal over the line then it was no goal. With this much controversy the NCAA should release the video still of the puck across the line. I won't be holding my breath waiting though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.