skateshattrick Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 12 minutes ago, nascar99 said: I'm doing my own personal statistical projection with the stats I have. I don't think that's offensive I didn't mean to pick on you because I like your posts and you provide a lot of good information regarding recruits. Generally, I don't like negative posts directed at recruits or even current players in a public forum. I would hate to see any recruit decommit based upon what they or their family reads on a message board and I fear that could happen. Quote
nascar99 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 17 minutes ago, skateshattrick said: I didn't mean to pick on you because I like your posts and you provide a lot of good information regarding recruits. Generally, I don't like negative posts directed at recruits or even current players in a public forum. I would hate to see any recruit decommit based upon what they or their family reads on a message board and I fear that could happen. When I say "light it up', I generally mean over point per game type of production, especially as a younger aged player. Pilgrim can certainly be a solid contributor (as Josephson is right now), but his junior production as an 18 & 19 year old doesn't suggest that he'll be a dominant, light it up, NCAA producer. That is more of my point. Quote
RhettRingers Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 53 minutes ago, tnt said: Are you talking about Brock Schultz, or Ashton? Didn't realize he was talking Ashton. Quote
beastandco Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago If the roster limits are raised next year, this could make the “who comes in next year” conversation easier. Going from 26 to 28/29 would create a lot more flexibility this offseason. Seems like a no brainer for the NCAA to make the change as well. 1 Quote
petey23 Posted 29 minutes ago Posted 29 minutes ago 2 hours ago, skateshattrick said: I really dislike posts like this for a couple of reasons. First, these kids and their families read these message boards. Second, and more importantly, you have no idea because his scoring may be based upon team philosophy, the players around him, whether he plays top 6 and specialty teams, etc. Chris Vandevelde played 2 years in the USHL. His first season he scored 5 points in 7 games. His second year, he scored 36 points in 56 games. After a slow freshman year adapting to college, Chris put up 32 points his sophomore year, 35 points his junior year, and 41 points his senior year. He was also an assistant captain and one of the best young men I have ever met to play at UND. How do you know Pilgrim will not be Chris Vandevelde? How about trusting the coaching staff rather than cherry picking stats? Pilgrim leads his team in scoring and has missed a 1/4 of the season. It really comes down to what skills transfer from Juniors to college. Some guys find the skills that separated them in Juniors no longer happens in college(Cichy) and some guys just keep doing what they do. Would not surprise me in Pilgrim puts up .75-1.0 a game from his Sophomore to Senior seasons at UND. 2 Quote
tnt Posted 15 minutes ago Posted 15 minutes ago 1 hour ago, beastandco said: If the roster limits are raised next year, this could make the “who comes in next year” conversation easier. Going from 26 to 28/29 would create a lot more flexibility this offseason. Seems like a no brainer for the NCAA to make the change as well. Wonder if the limit increase could lead to more transfer portal activity since you might have guys on the roster who see little to no playing time. We’ve seen that not everyone would find a new home though. Quote
tnt Posted 10 minutes ago Posted 10 minutes ago 1 hour ago, RhettRingers said: Didn't realize he was talking Ashton. I’m assuming he was since Brock has been on fire. But who knows if Ashton is being held back being on a team that doesn’t score a lot, and we’ve seen circumstances can make quite a difference. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.