Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Hawkster

Members
  • Posts

    2,488
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    10

Everything posted by Hawkster

  1. Trust me, if we go without a nickname, we won't be called North Dakota or "no nickname". We all know that Fighting Sioux will be screamed at every game even more and this disaster will never go away from us.
  2. Just once let's not be viewed ascopying or following. We seem to have the reputation right now and it's time to get out from under it. RR had the Roughriders name and there's no reason for us to down that road. Besides, I really don't think Roughriders is really that great a name, although it's probably better than Blaze.
  3. Roughriders: Already in use by a local high school North Dakota: It's not a nickname and worse, we don't want to redo this fiasco again in a couple years. Sorry but this route is simply unacceptable to both me and the NCAA.
  4. This unfortunately will always be the problem. It's CAVALRY!!!! I actually think Cavalry would be a good name for us, but even our own people can't get it right.
  5. I can live with: Cavalry Fighting Hawks ThunderHawks NoDaks Force Explorers North Stars I definitely DO NOT WANT North Dakota Blaze Fighting Green Pride Spirit SunDogs Roughriders Beats me why they keep leaving North Dakota on the list. We know the NCAA won't allow it and at any rate, it's not good business to go down that road again.
  6. Wow, they only give us 1 chance out of 100 to win? I have the game circled as one of our loses, but I don't think it will be as bad as Massey predicts.
  7. It's to the point I really don't even look forward to this game any more due to comments like that from both sides. I think everyone needs to go back to their corner until a week before the game.
  8. The forum took down the challenge poll now I see, but I noticed yesterday that "Badlanders" was actually leading. Not sure what to make of that, but at any rate it would be better than no name at all.
  9. Does Jamestown even have a conference any more? A few years ago they were begging NAIA conferences in MN and MT to take them and no one wanted to.
  10. Kelley and/or the committee need to come out and just say having no nickname is just unacceptable and we aren't going there. I will never understand why this idea was allowed to fester as long as it has. Pick a damn name and move on, this has dragged out way too long. I'm sorry, but if it goes much longer, I'm not going to give a rip what they pick. Six months ago only a few names looked good to me, now anything except having no name is getting appealing.
  11. Roughriders is one name I just can't support. Something about it that rubs me the wrong way.
  12. Same could probably be said about hockey, particularly as it applies massively to women's hockey
  13. Why is this thread in the football forum? Title nine applies to all sports, not just football.
  14. It will always bug me that we waited to move up. No guts, no glory. And it shows here at UND too.
  15. He was talking about hosting a playoff game, not getting into the playoffs. But I will bet that if it takes us 8 more seasons to get into the playoffs Bubba ain't gonna be around to see it. JMO.
  16. I think Pat is almost like a unicorn, legendary and mystical. Maybe he only existed in our minds. I miss him too
  17. I can see the points that others have made about FBS transfers, and you are right, they do have a place. I just want to get to playoffs, and I don't care how we do it. I've always scaled back my optimism to 7-4 and hopefully that gets us in. Loses against WY, NDSU, MT, and CP.
  18. I agree fully. Nokota has always been my first choice, ever since PCM suggested it years ago and Charging Nokota works just as well.
  19. To an extent, you are right. What I was trying to get across was that everyone thinks FBS transfers are going to come in here and turn us into an FCS superpower in one year. It doesn't work that way.
  20. I'm thinking 8-3 and I'm too pessimistic? LOL
  21. I really think we are expecting way too much performance out of the FBS drop downs. These guys aren't going to be second stringers from Alabama, they will be guys who couldn't cut it on mediocre FBS teams. These are FBS teams that aren't much better than us, we are getting are getting the scrapings that failed. I just don't see FBS transfers as being the magic bullet that others do. I'd rather recruit and retain top notch kids out of high school and build the program right from the get go. Think about it, can you really succeed with kids that couldn't hack it elsewhere? And yes, I want to win immediately just as much as anyone but I'm not betting on transfers being able to do it. That said, I think we can make the playoffs this year with what we have. Just gotta do it.
  22. I agree with you, Wyoming is going to be a tough game. Every year a few people here, including geaux_sioux think the FB team has progressed to the point of being the greatest thing to ever grace the end zone, only to be proven wrong. With the QB situation, and really the whole offense still a big question mark, I don't see WY as being a win. I still think-hope-demand we make the playoffs, but this first game is probably a loss. To pretend that we are going to go into Laramie and push these guys around is unrealistic, even for geuax sioux. I want an FBS win as bad as anyone, but won't happen here. Main focus should be getting to 8-3 and the playoffs. Anything less is not a successful season.
  23. Better now than in a year from now when we've wasted a redshirt scholly on him. If they don't want to play, we don't want them.
  24. Lets see, Roughriders, where have I seen that? Oh yea, it's the name of Red River High School in Grand Forks. Yet, that idea gets play also.
  25. Nope, can't see it happening. Bohl hates UND from his NDSU days. He's not going to let anyone play for us until they sit a year.
×
×
  • Create New...