Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, F'n Hawks said:

When they play games like these it’s easy to tell Danielson doesn’t belong.

Doesn’t belong? He had 8 points off 4/5 from the field and is one of the best defenders. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, Hawksbball said:

Doesn’t belong? He had 8 points off 4/5 from the field and is one of the best defenders. 

I was too harsh with what I said, he plays hard and gives decent minutes off the bench. 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, HoopsFan03 said:

NDSU beat Portland last night without Grant Nelson... 67-62

Sounds like Bison played great defense.  Portland only shot about 32%.  

  • Upvote 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, HoopsFan03 said:

They also shot 44% from the field and 42% from three. I wasn't able to watch any of the game. Would have been interesting to see though what they did vs what we did to have that big of a difference between the two games. 

I agree.  Bison have won two games so far.  How did they pull this off or was it Portland not playing well.  We need more comparison.  They play Montana next.  Tonight we play Idaho.  We could use another road win.

Posted
39 minutes ago, Nodak78 said:

Sounds like Bison played great defense.  Portland only shot about 32%.  

I watched a bit of it. Portland missed a lot of open shots that they normally don't. Made some bad mistakes down the stretch as well. Credit to NDSU, they capitalized to get their first D1 win of the year. 

Posted
1 minute ago, jdub27 said:

I watched a bit of it. Portland missed a lot of open shots that they normally don't. Made some bad mistakes down the stretch as well. Credit to NDSU, they capitalized to get their first D1 win of the year. 

Portland started out 3 for 18.  That is not 'defense', that is a really bad night.  Especially when looking at NDSU's defensive "efforts" this year.  

Posted
2 minutes ago, UND1983 said:

Portland started out 3 for 18.  That is not 'defense', that is a really bad night.  Especially when looking at NDSU's defensive "efforts" this year.  

You're saying that taking almost 14 minutes to get into double digits isn't normal??

  • Upvote 1
Posted

I watched most of the game.  Portland did not play well at all.  Looked like they were overlooking NDSU after what they did to UND.  They didnt shoot anything close to what they did against UND.   I didnt see that NDSU played any kind of spectacular defense.  Portland just looked off and not like the same team I watched play against UND.  

Posted
47 minutes ago, HoopsFan03 said:

They also shot 44% from the field and 42% from three. I wasn't able to watch any of the game. Would have been interesting to see though what they did vs what we did to have that big of a difference between the two games. 

Not making excuses but UND had long travel arrangements from Iowa St to Portland.  That may have contributed to tired legs when we had our couple of scoring droughts.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, UND1983 said:

UND needs to beat Idaho tonight.  Winnable game

Agreed.  Win this one, guaranteed winning non-conference record (they aren't losing to North Central).

Match their entire win total from last year. 

Posted
4 hours ago, Nodak78 said:

I agree.  Bison have won two games so far.  How did they pull this off or was it Portland not playing well.  We need more comparison.  They play Montana next.  Tonight we play Idaho.  We could use another road win.

I agree Portland didn’t play well against NDSU but the Bison were also without their best player. Portland would probably beat NDSU most nights even if Nelson was healthy, at least early in this season. But looking at Portland’s past scores this year, they lost to #1 N. Carolina by 7, #12 Michigan State by 1 and beat Villanova, this is a good win for NDSU. The Bison have some really talented true freshmen that need game experience. By March if they make the Summit Tourny, they may be able to make some noise.

Posted

NDSU did what UND should have done. They limited possessions and grinded it out. Sure Portland played bad, but NDSU did what NDSU usually does... play really slow, muck it up and have a chance at the end. 

If UND continues to play Nero, Sueker, Eaglestaff a ton of minutes together, UND will not like what opposing teams do to them offensively. The path to success is to play Trent, Brooks, Norman, Omot, T, Brady, Mathews the majority of minutes and those other 3 can play 8-10 to provide a scoring pop. But they cannot be 20+ min guys. UND's personnel is built to play kind of an ugly style and try to win in the 60's. (see thanksgiving weekend)

Posted
39 minutes ago, nd1sufan said:

I agree Portland didn’t play well against NDSU but the Bison were also without their best player. Portland would probably beat NDSU most nights even if Nelson was healthy, at least early in this season. But looking at Portland’s past scores this year, they lost to #1 N. Carolina by 7, #12 Michigan State by 1 and beat Villanova, this is a good win for NDSU. The Bison have some really talented true freshmen that need game experience. By March if they make the Summit Tourny, they may be able to make some noise.

Well the good news there is everyone gets in this year.

  • Upvote 1
Posted

Eaglestaff needs to be playing mistakes and all.  He is a freshman and I can live with his mistakes.  We need to development him as he is part of the future.  Not to mention he is a scorer and we lack that from Trent, Brooks, Brady and Mathews.  We cant have that many guys that dont look to score and expect to win.    Suecker and Nero should not be getting the minutes they are.  

 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
8 hours ago, NewUndFan said:

I watched most of the game.  Portland did not play well at all.  Looked like they were overlooking NDSU after what they did to UND.  They didnt shoot anything close to what they did against UND.   I didnt see that NDSU played any kind of spectacular defense.  Portland just looked off and not like the same team I watched play against UND.  

NDSU was playing without their best player as well.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...