fightingsioux4life Posted November 29, 2014 Posted November 29, 2014 well that's a pathetic way to lose a tie game. The shootout in general is pathetic. But according to Hak, Montreal Canadiens fans like it so we are supposed to like it too. I have no problem settling for a tie in a league as tough as this. That would be better than deciding precious league points via a cute little skills competition. Quote
willythekid Posted November 29, 2014 Posted November 29, 2014 Well, another lesson of too little too late. Lazy, sloppy play in the second kept them out of this one. Parks should be ashamed of himself for taking that dumb penalty and then even worse, taking the rest of the shift off. 1 Quote
Cratter Posted November 29, 2014 Posted November 29, 2014 Shootout has to go to advantage Omaha with their goalie having better numbers. Nailed it. Quote
siouxweet Posted November 29, 2014 Posted November 29, 2014 I'm surprised people don't get the overtime rules for NCHC league games. Win in regulation is 3 points. Tie is a point for each team, with shootout to follow. Shootout winner gets the extra point. Game is a tie for pairwise purposes. Points are for NCHC standings. UND just tied Omaha in the all important Pairwise rankings. I know but having anything determined by a shootout is pathetic. 2 Quote
cberkas Posted November 29, 2014 Posted November 29, 2014 They are ahead of UND in the conference. Omaha is still behind UND in the conference. Omaha has only made the NCAA's once since Blais became the coach. Quote
siouxforeverbaby Posted November 29, 2014 Posted November 29, 2014 I'm surprised people don't get the overtime rules for NCHC league games. Win in regulation is 3 points. Tie is a point for each team, with shootout to follow. Shootout winner gets the extra point. Game is a tie for pairwise purposes. Points are for NCHC standings. UND just tied Omaha in the all important Pairwise rankings. That is what I was thinking...but I couldn't remember the point values...and didn't feel like looking them up. Quote
fightingsioux4life Posted November 29, 2014 Posted November 29, 2014 I'm surprised people don't get the overtime rules for NCHC league games. Win in regulation is 3 points. Tie is a point for each team, with shootout to follow. Shootout winner gets the extra point. Game is a tie for pairwise purposes. Points are for NCHC standings. UND just tied Omaha in the all important Pairwise rankings. This is only the second year of the NCHC and the infernal shootout. People will catch on sooner or later. Quote
.357 Posted November 29, 2014 Posted November 29, 2014 I'm surprised people don't get the overtime rules for NCHC league games. Win in regulation is 3 points. Tie is a point for each team, with shootout to follow. Shootout winner gets the extra point. Game is a tie for pairwise purposes. Points are for NCHC standings. UND just tied Omaha in the all important Pairwise rankings. Thanks, all I needed was an explanation; not an editorial about everyone needing to already know this.. Quote
Cratter Posted November 29, 2014 Posted November 29, 2014 Omaha is still behind UND in the conference. Omaha has only made the NCAA's once since Blais became the coach. Only cause UND has played more games. Its called Parity. Its what causes teams that have never sniffed a championship to get one. Yale, Union. UNO. Quote
scpa0305 Posted November 29, 2014 Posted November 29, 2014 Schlossman said Omaha gets the extra point, though ..So how many pts does each team get? Really? 1 Quote
OETKB Posted November 29, 2014 Posted November 29, 2014 The difference in this game ( and Hak agrees) was the weak-ass shift after the 1st goal, where they handed a goal to UNO. You can't give up such a weak one after working so hard to get ahead, 1 Quote
scpa0305 Posted November 29, 2014 Posted November 29, 2014 Thanks, all I needed was an explanation; not an editorial about everyone needing to already know this.. I took it as u didn't really get how this whole thing worked. Quote
MafiaMan Posted November 29, 2014 Posted November 29, 2014 The shootout in general is pathetic. But according to Hak, Montreal Canadiens fans like it so we are supposed to like it too. I have no problem settling for a tie in a league as tough as this. That would be better than deciding precious league points via a cute little skills competition. But the casual fan LOVES shoot-outs...right? Quote
Let'sGoHawks! Posted November 29, 2014 Posted November 29, 2014 Thanks, all I needed was an explanation; not an editorial about everyone needing to already know this.. You are welcome pal. Quote
OETKB Posted November 29, 2014 Posted November 29, 2014 I have no problem with shootouts. I DO have a problem with sucky home records. 1 Quote
Cratter Posted November 29, 2014 Posted November 29, 2014 I took it as u didn't really get how this whole thing worked. Isn't this site google? Don't know something just ask instead of looking it up? Quote
Cratter Posted November 29, 2014 Posted November 29, 2014 I have no problem with shootouts. I DO have a problem with sucky home records. Everyone hates shootouts when you lose. Love em when you win. Its only for conference rankings. So whats it matter? You need to crown a conference champion somehow. Quote
iluvdebbies Posted November 29, 2014 Posted November 29, 2014 Everyone hates shootouts when you lose. Love em when you win. Its only for conference rankings. So whats it matter? You need to crown a conference champion somehow. You must be loving shootouts tonight then. Quote
fightingsioux4life Posted November 29, 2014 Posted November 29, 2014 But the casual fan LOVES shoot-outs...right? And the "casual fan" would probably love to decide basketball games with a slam dunk contest or baseball games with a home-run hitting contest. But that doesn't change the fact that they are exhibitions of individual talent being used to decide the outcome of a team game. And that is why the shootout has no place in hockey. 1 Quote
andtheHomeoftheSIOUX!! Posted November 29, 2014 Posted November 29, 2014 Shootouts are the worst no matter who wins. 2 Quote
fightingsioux4life Posted November 29, 2014 Posted November 29, 2014 Everyone hates shootouts when you lose. Love em when you win. Its only for conference rankings. So whats it matter? You need to crown a conference champion somehow. Wrong. I hate shootouts as a matter of principle. But since we are stuck with them, we need to win them. Quote
MafiaMan Posted November 29, 2014 Posted November 29, 2014 And the "casual fan" would probably love to decide basketball games with a slam dunk contest or baseball games with a home-run hitting contest. But that doesn't change the fact that they are exhibitions of individual talent being used to decide the outcome of a team game. And that is why the shootout has no place in hockey. You are preaching to the choir, fs4l... 1 Quote
OETKB Posted November 29, 2014 Posted November 29, 2014 To clarify my take on tonight, UND looked pretty good, except for that shift after the 1st goal. And, my point tonight is....UND needs to have a dominant home record, and that is NOT happening so far this year. Quote
.357 Posted November 29, 2014 Posted November 29, 2014 I took it as u didn't really get how this whole thing worked. I understand now. Try losing the snarky attitude.. Quote
Cratter Posted November 29, 2014 Posted November 29, 2014 You must be loving shootouts tonight then. Cause I actually watch college hockey? Sometimes without green glasses. Did you see all the people that think UND is world beaters because they have a 2 by their name? And Omaha is a "crappy" team despite having less losses than UND does. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.