siouxweet Posted February 18, 2013 Posted February 18, 2013 I would too....but I would rather have have a 1/2 seed and get that first win. I think QU and minny have those two spots virtually locked up. highest we could get would probably be number 3 overall, and that would take probably losing no more than one more game here on out. Quote
siouxu31 Posted February 18, 2013 Posted February 18, 2013 I think QU and minny have those two spots virtually locked up. highest we could get would probably be number 3 overall, and that would take probably losing no more than one more game here on out. We can possibly overtake Minnesota. Currently we have a better common opponent record than them. They are beating us in RPI, 1 victory over us, and TUC %. We have a better common opponent record right now. So it is 3-1 them. If CC drops out of TUC which they are very close right now with an RPI of .5002 (anything below .5000 drops them out) our TUC percentage would increase. Our comparison in TUC with minnesota would have our record at 9-5-3 and minnesotas would be 8-5-1 heading down the home stretch. If we end up flipping this comparison with minny its now 2-2 with them holding the tie breaker with RPI. If we were to face them in the final five and win we would then win the overall comparison 3-2. RPI - minny 1 point TUC - und 1 point Common Opponent - und 1 point Head to head - split one point each. We would obviously have to end well, but the key is getting CC out of the TUC since we are 2-2 against them. We could end up flipping comparisons with both BC and UNH also, but there is really no way for us to overtake Miami unless they completely collapse giving us the comparison in TUC and RPI. The common opponent versus Miami is done. Our one loss versus Alaska at the start of the season killed us in our comparison with Miami. Quote
siouxnami Posted February 18, 2013 Posted February 18, 2013 I suspect we will play Minnesota in the WCHA tournament and if we win that we easily pass them. Quote
Goon Posted February 18, 2013 Posted February 18, 2013 what 8-9-1 isn't going to cut it? that being said when it is all said and done I think msum will end up being a 3-4 seed, minny will be a one seed, und will be a two and scsu will be a two as well and denver a three. I've said it before I would love to end up being an 8 seed paired up in qu's bracket. I have a bad feeling their going to put three of the five WCHA teams in the same regional and it's going to be something like UND, UMN and DU. Or it could be UMN, SCSU, (insert crap bag) DU... The NCAA will never allow the WCHA to have an all WCHA Frozen Four again. Quote
iluvdebbies Posted February 18, 2013 Posted February 18, 2013 I have a bad feeling their going to put three of the five WCHA teams in the same regional and it's going to be something like UND, UMN and DU. Or it could be UMN, SCSU, (insert crap bag) DU... The NCAA will never allow the WCHA to have an all WCHA Frozen Four again. Can't have three teams from the same conference in the same regional. Quote
jodcon Posted February 18, 2013 Posted February 18, 2013 Can't have three teams from the same conference in the same regional. Because they can't play the first game I suppose? Quote
fargosioux Posted February 18, 2013 Posted February 18, 2013 Can't have three teams from the same conference in the same regional. Didn't they put UND, Denver, and Wisconsin in the same regional in Madison a few years back? Quote
iluvdebbies Posted February 18, 2013 Posted February 18, 2013 Didn't they put UND, Denver, and Wisconsin in the same regional in Madison a few years back? yes they did in 2008....just learned something today. First round matchups are avoided unless a conference has 5 or more teams selected. In that case integrity of the bracket is maintained. So it would be possible to have three teams from one conference in a regional. Quote
siouxu31 Posted February 18, 2013 Posted February 18, 2013 Didn't they put UND, Denver, and Wisconsin in the same regional in Madison a few years back? Yes, and a sub .500 Wisco team beat Denver in the first round and then lost in overtime to UND in the Regional final. I can't remember why they were all placed in the same regional. The only way I can see it happening again is if 4 teams from the same conference all are the same seed (i.e. all 3 seeds finishing 9, 10, 11, and 12 in the final pairwise rankings.) Quote
Goon Posted February 18, 2013 Posted February 18, 2013 Can't have three teams from the same conference in the same regional. They had three in the Madison Regional in 2008.Wisconsin beat DU in the first round before UND beat UW to go to the Frozen Four. Quote
MafiaMan Posted February 18, 2013 Posted February 18, 2013 I guarantee you that even with FOUR teams selected, you will see two WCHA teams placed in the same region. Goon is right...the NCAA absolutely wants its east vs west match-up at any and all costs. Quote
siouxweet Posted February 18, 2013 Posted February 18, 2013 one of the reasons that happened in 2008 is because the wcha had 6 schools in and wisc and cc were hosts and you had 3 wcha schools as 2 seeds so it was unavoidable. i do think the ncaa will do all it can to avoid that of possible. now if the wcha has 6 teams in this year then yes that could happen again. unless omaha plays itself in here in the next few weeks I don't think it will be an issue. as it stands right now the wcha would have one 1 seed, 2 two seeds and two three seeds with enough room to wiggle around. Quote
keikla Posted February 18, 2013 Posted February 18, 2013 I wish they'd make the west regionals a little more west. The farthest a Boston-area school would have to travel to a regional is 836 miles. The closest regional for the Sioux is 900 miles. Quote
Blackheart Posted February 19, 2013 Posted February 19, 2013 I wish they'd make the west regionals a little more west. The farthest a Boston-area school would have to travel to a regional is 836 miles. The closest regional for the Sioux is 900 miles. That's your West coast bias talking... Quote
keikla Posted February 19, 2013 Posted February 19, 2013 That's your West coast bias talking... Ha I actually live in Maine. But nothing makes you more aware of how extensive the east coast bias is (in all aspects of life, not just sports) like being a non-easterner living out east! Quote
MafiaMan Posted February 19, 2013 Posted February 19, 2013 Ha I actually live in Maine. But nothing makes you more aware of how extensive the east coast bias is (in all aspects of life, not just sports) like being a non-easterner living out east! I have relatives in the Boston area...I swear, anything on a map to the left of Worcester is considered 'west coast.' Back in the early 1990's, I had them convinced that US mail was still delivered in the Dakotas by Pony Express. Unbelievable. Quote
siouxforeverbaby Posted February 19, 2013 Posted February 19, 2013 I have relatives in the Boston area...I swear, anything on a map to the left of Worcester is considered 'west coast.' Back in the early 1990's, I had them convinced that US mail was still delivered in the Dakotas by Pony Express. Unbelievable. It isn't? I thought it was that or dog sled...at least that is what they told me at the post office Quote
jodcon Posted February 19, 2013 Posted February 19, 2013 I have relatives in the Boston area...I swear, anything on a map to the left of Worcester is considered 'west coast.' Back in the early 1990's, I had them convinced that US mail was still delivered in the Dakotas by Pony Express. Unbelievable. My Dad told me when they shipped out of NY for the military during WW2 easterners asked him if they still had to fight Indians occasionally...of course he said yes. Quote
petey23 Posted February 19, 2013 Posted February 19, 2013 Yes, and a sub .500 Wisco team beat Denver in the first round and then lost in overtime to UND in the Regional final. I can't remember why they were all placed in the same regional. The only way I can see it happening again is if 4 teams from the same conference all are the same seed (i.e. all 3 seeds finishing 9, 10, 11, and 12 in the final pairwise rankings.) Umm. That is actually the scenario that would make the NCAA the least likely to place teams from the same conference in the same regional. Quote
siouxu31 Posted February 20, 2013 Posted February 20, 2013 Umm. That is actually the scenario that would make the NCAA the least likely to place teams from the same conference in the same regional. I guess I need to explain this a little deeper for you...... For example, if there are four number 2 seeds from the wcha and there is also a fifth team from the wcha that is a 3 seed, then there is no way for the committee to avoid a first round matchup. Quote
MafiaMan Posted February 20, 2013 Posted February 20, 2013 ...if there are four number 2 seeds from the wcha and there is also a fifth team from the wcha that is a 3 seed, then there is no way for the committee to avoid a first round matchup. "Well played Mauer." Quote
jimdahl Posted February 21, 2013 Author Posted February 21, 2013 UND closes in on NCAA tournament berth The biggest story of the week that Quinnipiac's position has only become stronger. Quinnipiac (PWR Details) is particularly safe, even a catastrophe seems to only drop them 3 spots. Winning only 2 of their remaining 4 would leave them with only about a 10% chance of falling from the #1 spot. Their .7778 vs. TUCs is unassailable, and .5828 RPI is miles ahead of #2 Minnesota .5658. To put that RPI into perspective, if Minnesota swept its final 6 games their RPI would only rise to about .5738 (Minnesota RPI details). Quote
iluvdebbies Posted February 27, 2013 Posted February 27, 2013 The Sioux are now tied with BC for 5th in the pairwise. Quote
Goon Posted February 27, 2013 Posted February 27, 2013 The Sioux are now tied with BC for 5th in the pairwise. So I wonder if UND will now end up in QU's regional? Quote
iluvdebbies Posted February 27, 2013 Posted February 27, 2013 So I wonder if UND will now end up in QU's regional? If the season ended today i think they still would go to Toledo. Since BC and Und are tied I think they would put BC in Manchester and the Sioux in Toledo = ticket $ale$ Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.