BigGreyAnt41 Posted November 30, 2008 Posted November 30, 2008 VV foot WAS on the red outline of the goalcrease when it made contact with the CU goalie's foot. Hard to argue.
Sioux_Hab-it Posted November 30, 2008 Posted November 30, 2008 Terrible call, the goalie caused the contact himself and VV was outside the crease and not moving. %#@$ I hate WCHA officiating.
siouxforce19 Posted November 30, 2008 Posted November 30, 2008 VV foot WAS on the red outline of the goalcrease when it made contact with the CU goalie's foot. Hard to argue. I found that call bull$%!#... there was nothing there.
UNDintheNHL Posted November 30, 2008 Posted November 30, 2008 wow dude that is twice that goalie got surprised by the puck. extra time on the PP now...some 5-on-3 time now too...:23 secs
BigGreyAnt41 Posted November 30, 2008 Posted November 30, 2008 Terrible call, the goalie caused the contact himself and VV was outside the crease and not moving. %#@$ I hate WCHA officiating. I found that call bull$%!#... there was nothing there. I saw VV foot on the redline of the crease. I don't know the rule, but I would assume the red counts as part of the crease. It doesn't matter who initiates the contact because VV shouldn't have been in the crease. The goalie is allowed to have his space to move.
Sioux_Hab-it Posted November 30, 2008 Posted November 30, 2008 I saw VV foot on the redline of the crease. I don't know the rule, but I would assume the red counts as part of the crease. It doesn't matter who initiates the contact because VV shouldn't have been in the crease. The goalie is allowed to have his space to move. Bad call, Duncs just said in the intermission that the refs called it goalie interference. Watch it again the goalie intiated the contact.
jk Posted November 30, 2008 Posted November 30, 2008 Cornell is a big strong team that will do well this year. They came out like a team that lost 7-3 last night, winning a ton of battles. VV was on the edge of the crease, and if that's the rule, then I guess Cornell got the benefit of the closest goalie interference that will ever be called. Jones is a joy to watch when he's marking someone along the boards; best intensity on the team. Two nights in a row Cornell got a 2 that should have been a 5. Someone's going to get hurt.
sprig Posted November 30, 2008 Posted November 30, 2008 Bad call, Duncs just said in the intermission that the refs called it goalie interference. Watch it again the goalie intiated the contact. Can't believe they can watch that overhead video and still get it wrong. Total incompetence.
Sioux_Hab-it Posted November 30, 2008 Posted November 30, 2008 Cornell is a big strong team that will do well this year. They came out like a team that lost 7-3 last night, winning a ton of battles. VV was on the edge of the crease, and if that's the rule, then I guess Cornell got the benefit of the closest goalie interference that will ever be called. Jones is a joy to watch when he's marking someone along the boards; best intensity on the team. Two nights in a row Cornell got a 2 that should have been a 5. Someone's going to get hurt. Duncan just explained that they didn't call VV for being in the crease. The call was that he interfered with the goaltender. He did not, he was standing still and the goalie moved out and initiated the contact. Terrible call.
t_speaker31 Posted November 30, 2008 Posted November 30, 2008 this new president seems like a good guy to have a beer with.
UNDintheNHL Posted November 30, 2008 Posted November 30, 2008 Total incompetence is right, sprig, but do you expect anything different? I havent been able to watch much UND hockey this season, so I have to admit I am very behind on understanding and seeing the differences in the new guys. I just hope they are measureing up to the high standards of Fighting Sioux Hockey.
farce poobah Posted November 30, 2008 Posted November 30, 2008 I'm going to go against the prevailing opinion, and say it was a textbook skate-in-the-crease call that waved off the Sioux goal. They got the call right, at least that one time. Now, if they would clamp down on Cornell's stick work.
UNDintheNHL Posted November 30, 2008 Posted November 30, 2008 this new president seems like a good guy to have a beer with. that is EXACTLY what I was thinking man I cant wait till I can make it back up there. once I get into the Navy, ill have the money to take some time off and afford a ticket up there.
BigGreyAnt41 Posted November 30, 2008 Posted November 30, 2008 Unless the rule was changed, VV is allowed to have his skate in the crease as long as he's not interfering with the goalie. As soon as he got in the way of the CU goalie, it became an issue. Maybe I just don't understand, but why should it matter who initiated contact? The fact is, there was contact, and it was because VV's skate was in the crease when the goalie ran into it. The rule used to say that you couldn't be in the crease at all, but the title game that was Denver vs. Maine caused that rule to change. There was a goal that was waved off in that game because a player had his toe in the crease on the opposite side of the crease from where all the action was. The player's toe didn't cause anything to change in the play, but because of the rule, they had to call off the goal. Following that game, they changed the rule so that as long as you're not interfering with the goalie, it's not bad to have a foot in the crease.
Oilcan89 Posted November 30, 2008 Posted November 30, 2008 How about a score? I see you the Gopher score posted but no Sioux score. I assume zero/zero?
siouxforeverbaby Posted November 30, 2008 Posted November 30, 2008 Finally, got home and tuned into the video online! Thanks for the explanation on why the goal was disallowed. Anyone watching the video and can tell me how we have been playing. We didn't sound that bad on the radio.
nodak hockey fanatic Posted November 30, 2008 Posted November 30, 2008 0-0 halfway through second. sioux pp coming up.
Shane N Posted November 30, 2008 Posted November 30, 2008 Keep up with the play-by-play! I'm stuck at a PC in the metro area and really miss not being able to watch the game, let alone hear it on the radio.
nodak hockey fanatic Posted November 30, 2008 Posted November 30, 2008 not alot of great chances on that pp. still no score, sioux starting to control the puck.
nodak hockey fanatic Posted November 30, 2008 Posted November 30, 2008 scrivens looks a little shaky tonight... we need to be putting more than 11 shots on goal halfway through the game. LETS GO SIOUX!! we need to get shots on goal and traffic in front, i think we will need some ugly ones tonight.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now