Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

FSSD

Members
  • Posts

    2,739
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    15

Everything posted by FSSD

  1. When healthy I thought Brown played fine.. and I know everyone was on Mackey, but the secondary improved significantly when he moved back to corner. Secondary is going to be a huge concern next year Graduation/Other/Transfers D. Brown R. Cain C. Hall C. Kuska (injury - posted on SS he is not playing? W. Lewis C. Mackey Corners: C. Brown - heard good things about him as a fr. but has not played much. R. Harris - played sparingly - good in run support. T. Ivery - could be a candidate to move back to WR due to losses on that side of the ball. D. Konowalski - have not seen him play. SS: J. Butler - played some last year. Have not see much from him at this point B. Carr - OK WS: W. James - Special Teams C. Reyes
  2. Do they have any corners?
  3. I am saying it is fine for coaches and people to move ahead with their careers. In this case, it appears Dale and Bubba viewed SIU as a step up in their careers versus continuing to coach or coaching at UND. So, I am not interested as fan in Dale or someone (Bubba) from his staff coming to UND to coach. I don't view this as much of a national search. I will continue to support the UND programs and players. But, I had hoped for more!!
  4. UND was just starting the move up to D-1AA when Dale left - why not stay at UND and build the program. Again, I am fine with people taking opportunities to further their careers. I have done the same thing with my career. I guess as a fan, I am saying that I have moved on also. So, I am not interested.
  5. So, you are saying UND passed him over to promote Muss.. I say bull, Dale and Bubba took off together for SUI and turned there back on UND - that is why I don't want anything to do with either of them now.
  6. If Bubba is the obvious choice and bleeds green and is a UND guy. Why did he go to SIU 5 years ago? He should have taken the job when Dale left..
  7. I think SDSU is going to be a match up problem for UND. UND started the season with 3 post players and they are down to 1, plus they only have 2 Fs right now. The rest of the roster is small ball. SDSU has a tall line-up and makes UND shoot by playing zone and UND does not have the shooters to take them out of the zone. I think SDSU wins hope I am wrong.
  8. Neither..
  9. FSSD

    2013 Playoffs

    They need a spy on the QB. His running is killing UM
  10. FSSD

    2013 Playoffs

    Agreed..
  11. Seriously - congrats to the SL
  12. Wow, I did not see that coming... very strange. What does this say about the Southland? Now for the important details - since Tulsa already taken a school named Tulsa. Do they go by Oral Bob, Bob Oral, Tulsa Bob, or Bob Tulsa - I need some help on this ... don't like any of those.
  13. Saul at NDSU was dumb enough to run man to man all night against us.
  14. UND needing to work on the offense against a zone is a under statement.. anyone with bucket of chicken - jobu (zone defense) is killing us.. major league reference
  15. Pacific is now leading by 4
  16. UND offense looks like hell...
  17. Pacific starting the half with a zone defense.. this will be interesting..
  18. boy no drop off when Hooker is running the point.. needs to work on his shooting.. NOTE: Pacific beat Poly yesterday. Beating Pacific would be nice.
  19. UND foul trouble at the F spot - Nash, Calcaterra, Salmonson all with 2 fouls. Hopefully they can get more playing time from the bigs in the second half.
  20. 3 forwards for Pacific have 14, 9 and 6 points..
  21. agree.. not sure about his role it looks like he is the power forward when UND goes small ball..
  22. I understand but he has a nice scoring line tonight 5-11 from the field 0-2 from 3 and 16 points. Plus 8 rebs at half.. that is a game for most players.
  23. UND 48 Pacific 45 at the half - UND scoring leaders Huff, Web and Anderson..
  24. Hooker is nice... just had a great assist to Huff
  25. UND 41 Pacific 38 - 4:10 left in the half
×
×
  • Create New...