tnt

You mean that program that Craig Bohl deemed a step up from NDSU in relation to getting to the top of the coaching mountain? We can't help it if he brought that program down.

... but you said they should have won even with the injuries!

Sounds like you said even with the injuries they should have won, so I would think that means everybody picking up the slack. Just saying maybe you should address your quote to someone other than the fans if you think more could have been done to win those games.

You said not making the playoffs is on them for losing to a team like Idaho State.

Maybe you should text him and let him know "it's on them"! Maybe you can point out a bad coaching decision in that game against Idaho State, or a missed tackle by Ratelle.

Agree with this. Sometimes winning is a progression, so it would have been nice to get that playoff experience this year. Hopefully we can bypass that progression. The positive is that Bubba can still use this as a recruiting benefit, explaining to recruits how close they were and how they will be out to make up for it next year. Hopefully he can get out on the road and steal a few recruits from some of those playoff teams, while they are tied down with game planning.

Yeah, isn't it ironic that the reason UND isn't in the playoffs is because Bohl's team is so bad!

We'll be looking closely at your posts from here on out to see if you complain about officiating, because remember, there will always be that argument that if they would have done this better, or that better, officiating wouldn't matter.

I am comparing the way they scream in rage at the officials the same. As far as Andy Murray goes, he said he can't believe officials listen to the coaches and not just drop the puck, yet he is the first to go on and on after a call.

But Western Illinois got beat by that same team by a worse score and had a worse record.

Just a side note, are Andy Murray and Bob Motzko the Bo Pellini's of college hockey?

The announcers went on about Portland State wins against 2 FBS schools, and we beat them. We have an FBS win, are currently on a roll and lost one of our games to the 4-time champ. Sounds like they need to use a Pairwise ranking so you know that it isn't behind the scenes stuff going on.

Especially if they are trying to create something that will not have any hint of offensiveness or controversy.

I kind of liked it when the black jerseys only came out when they needed a critical win, not every second night on the road. It seemed like every time they came out under Hakstol, they played inspired hockey. Not so much tonight. Maybe it's just a matter that the players really like the black jerseys, and Berry has a different viewpoint on where the inspiration really comes from.

I agree, probably won't happen, but it isn't a headdress and feathers are a part of birds. This would be the perfect tie to the past like the Herald talked about, while not being blatant.

Brandon Biro from Spruce Grove committed to Penn State.

Well we've already seen how unique we became with the monitor pegging us as RedHawks per Brad's blog.

Would like to see a secondary logo with the wings on the right incorporated into Hawks as the "W". I think they want a few different logos, so that could go on t-shirts and the main logo on jerseys.

Probably not, it makes too much sense to do something like this to appease the ruffled feathers. Very much like the concept and effort put into this. A tweak here and there and you might actually have something "unique" in the world of bird nicknames. The problem with concepts like these is that it tends to get hopes up, that will ultimately be dashed by the "people in charge".

It would be interesting if they could incorporate a hawk as the "W" in Hawks on a jersey.

I wasn't questioning his intelligence, nor do I think they should be doing that with the hockey players, although there is a big difference between book smarts and common sense. (See the actions of Kelley for confirmation of that). I just find it funny that the poster was questioning intelligence based on what they say, or don't say about a nickname.

So Ausmus should have fell in line with the Common Man mantra -- "Fighting Hawks is a great name. Best name in all of college sports. It will give us the same pride of culture that Sioux did!"? They are just as disappointed as most fans, only they didn't go off like most fans did. They just said it wasn't their choice, just like Kelley and others like Dave St. Peter did.

There are plenty of hockey players that have given back to the University. And supporting the hockey program in turn supports the University as well. There are a lot of alumni that wouldn't be nearly as interested in the University after they left campus if they weren't able to keep an identity with the University. For many that is the hockey team. Maybe they can hire a consultant to let us know how much of an impact that is. Much rather support the sporting programs than some of the academic elite that got us where we are today, and others that have given the University a bad name with their disgusting criminal behavior.

A few people give their opinion without ripping into the selection and you question their intelligence. Maybe I should question the intelligence of the football player that was on the committee. What is it about the definition of "unique" that he and the committee don't understand. I thought that was self explanatory Say what you want about how UND hockey ties itself to the Sioux nickname and culture more than other teams, but it seems to have worked much better for them than it has for the other programs, and they are playing at the top level of competition.

Kind of like the old Al Gore philosophy of do what I say, not what I do type of scenario. We want you to follow this criteria, but we'll do what we want as far as advancing any of these.