aff Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 Augie could not get any type of assurance that they would get a conference invite within the next decade, even with a possibility of a new arena. The MidCon does not want three teams from South Dakota, as USD already has a firm gentleman's agreement from the MidCon, IMHO. (USD & SIUE are MidCon bound, UND is Big Sky bound.) If Augie really wants a taste of DI, they should consider hockey in the CHA. With SDSU and USD needing major facility upgrades, Augie is the only SD school now that even conceivably could start a hockey program. Doubt that will happen though. Alternate Theory: UND, USD, and Augie were all unable to get "gentleman's agreements" from any conference. Seeing this, UND held back for USD to assist with scheduling like SDSU and NDSU have done. USD similarly is planning on teaming up with UND, and simply hoping for league affiliation. Augi, seeing that league affiliation may be extremely difficult for any new move ups, and evaluating their financial situation going into indy status, declines to move up. I'm curious, if UND already has this bid to Big Sky locked up, why is it that they waited an extra year to move up? And how is it that USD already has a gentleman's agreement? Did the league presidents get together secretly and come to a consensus on USD 4-5 years in advance of their invitation, before knowing anything about the conference situation that they will be in? Just how far out do these conferences plan for members? Did the league know about Valpo moving years ahead of time? How long did Valpo have an agreement with the Horizon to move? 6 or 7 years ahead of time? Or do these invitations for affiliation only come years ahead of time for schools in the Dakota's? If USD is already in, why hasn't the mid-con made that clear? What benefit is there to keeping this in the dark for either party? The A-sun, sure doesn't seem to mind telling D-2's that they will take them if they move up, so why hasn't the mid-con done the same thing for USD if its such a sure bet? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
star2city Posted November 15, 2006 Author Share Posted November 15, 2006 I'm curious, if UND already has this bid to Big Sky locked up, why is it that they waited an extra year to move up? And how is it that USD already has a gentleman's agreement? Did the league presidents get together secretly and come to a consensus on USD 4-5 years in advance of their invitation, before knowing anything about the conference situation that they will be in? Just how far out do these conferences plan for members? Did the league know about Valpo moving years ahead of time? How long did Valpo have an agreement with the Horizon to move? 6 or 7 years ahead of time? Or do these invitations for affiliation only come years ahead of time for schools in the Dakota's? If USD is already in, why hasn't the mid-con made that clear? What benefit is there to keeping this in the dark for either party? The A-sun, sure doesn't seem to mind telling D-2's that they will take them if they move up, so why hasn't the mid-con done the same thing for USD if its such a sure bet? It just royally grates your nerves that USD is heading to the MidCOn, doesn't it? So now you are arguing that conferences don't have strategic plans beyond next month? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aff Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 It just royally grates your nerves that USD is heading to the MidCOn, doesn't it? So now you are arguing that conferences don't have strategic plans beyond next month? LOL. You say it like there's a single piece of evidence pointing towards that being true? And you're assuming that 7 presidents have already made a consensus decision for something that is going to happen 5 years from now? The big sky was arguing about SDSU and NDSU for a year, and couldn't come to a consensus for adding them, but the mid-con has secretly come to a unanimous decision on USD being added in 5 years, without the slightest hint to the public. Because letting people know that USD had a home ready to go would be terrible for who again...... I am a little disappointed in you, your old conspiracy theories use to have something to stand on. This whole UND to the sky with a canadian school and USD to the mid-con with SIU-E hasn't even been thought of anywhere but in your mind. Do you have any evidence of this, or any reason why it would remain a secret? I'm sure USD would want to tell everybody about its invitation, and I don't know why the mid-con would want to hold out on something like that. Tell me why they would keep it a secret? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diggler Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 I've always though UND would go to the Big Ten. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smoggy Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 I've always though UND would go to the Big Ten. Really? I figured we'd end up in the Big Eight. They need a presence further north. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
star2city Posted November 15, 2006 Author Share Posted November 15, 2006 LOL. You say it like there's a single piece of evidence pointing towards that being true? And you're assuming that 7 presidents have already made a consensus decision for something that is going to happen 5 years from now? Actually, it will happen in about two years. The big sky was arguing about SDSU and NDSU for a year, and couldn't come to a consensus for adding them,If you hadn't heard, they did reach a consensus, and the answer was no, no, no. (Three times). but the mid-con has secretly come to a unanimous decision on USD being added in 5 years, without the slightest hint to the public. Because letting people know that USD had a home ready to go would be terrible for who again......As USD's ICAC consultant said, don't move to DI unless you have a 90-95% certainty that a conference is awaiting you. Strangely enough, he says USD should move up. Wow, Aff, even you must have enough brain cells to figure that one out, considering all your USDSU / Illinois / Minnesota degrees. I am a little disappointed in you, your old conspiracy theories use to have something to stand on. This whole UND to the sky with a canadian school and USD to the mid-con with SIU-E hasn't even been thought of anywhere but in your mind. Do you have any evidence of this, or any reason why it would remain a secret? I'm sure USD would want to tell everybody about its invitation, and I don't know why the mid-con would want to hold out on something like that. Tell me why they would keep it a secret? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
star2city Posted November 15, 2006 Author Share Posted November 15, 2006 I've always though UND would go to the Big Ten. That's NDSU's next stop - they are UMinn's rivals. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diggler Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 Really? I figured we'd end up in the Big Eight. They need a presence further north. They could always bring back the SWC. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wsuwarrior Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 Or, maybe Winona State, Bemidji State, C-SP, one other NSIC join the core NCC of SCSU, MSU-M, UMD, and Augie. No reason for those teams to do it. Teams from the NSIC aren't at those fully funded levels yet, so why should they join in to the NCC? The left overs from the NCC will play by the NSIC rules or find somewhere else to play. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WYOBISONMAN Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 The MidCon does not want three teams from South Dakota, as USD already has a firm gentleman's agreement from the MidCon, IMHO. (USD & SIUE are MidCon bound, UND is Big Sky bound.) Man.........I really gotta get some of your mushrooms for my pizzas........those are REALLY strong ones! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aff Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 Actually, it will happen in about two years. If you hadn't heard, they did reach a consensus, and the answer was no, no, no. (Three times). As USD's ICAC consultant said, don't move to DI unless you have a 90-95% certainty that a conference is awaiting you. Strangely enough, he says USD should move up. Wow, Aff, even you must have enough brain cells to figure that one out, considering all your USDSU / Illinois / Minnesota degrees. Yeah, just like the consultant recommended that NDSU and SDSU not move up unless they had conference affiliation in hand. They still moved up, so I guess that means they had conference affiliation ready to go from the start? I mean surely a school wouldn't simply ignore the advice of a consultant.... Thats got to be the most ridiculous argument for USD having conference affiliation I have ever heard. And you still haven't answered my question, why would USD and the mid-con keep this a secret? What benefit is there in that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
star2city Posted November 15, 2006 Author Share Posted November 15, 2006 Yeah, just like the consultant recommended that NDSU and SDSU not move up unless they had conference affiliation in hand. They still moved up, so I guess that means they had conference affiliation ready to go from the start? I mean surely a school wouldn't simply ignore the advice of a consultant.... Thats got to be the most ridiculous argument for USD having conference affiliation I have ever heard. And you still haven't answered my question, why would USD and the mid-con keep this a secret? What benefit is there in that? Aff, you really can't be that slow can you? The Big SKy and MidCon prefer teams later in their DI transition. The conferences also want to protect themselves from the 5% chance that things will not go as planned. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
star2city Posted November 15, 2006 Author Share Posted November 15, 2006 Man.........I really gotta get some of your mushrooms for my pizzas........those are REALLY strong ones! It's the same mushrooms that said NDSU would never be in the Big SKy, that predicted the Great West formation, and said a more than a month ago that NDSU/SDSU to the Gateway is inevitable. Not bad mushrooms. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MplsBison Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 http://www.in-forum.com/Sports/articles/146345 Well, things are a bit clearer now. Assuming USD goes DI, UNO goes MIAA, and Augi goes to the NSIC, the NCC will be down to Saint Cloud, Duluth, and Mankato, who all could go to the NSIC, I think. That would put the NSIC at 14 members, though. Probably a bit much. Perhaps Crookston and Mary will join a DII DAC conference in the future. Maybe Northern State as well. And then U Sioux Falls could join the NSIC with Augi for a 12 member conferece: Moorhead Bemidji Marshall Winona Saint Cloud Mankato Duluth Augi Sioux Falls Concordia Wayne Upper Iowa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cratter Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 It's the same mushrooms that said NDSU would never be in the Big SKy, that predicted the Great West formation, and said a more than a month ago that NDSU/SDSU to the Gateway is inevitable. Not bad mushrooms. The following I-AA football conference is just begging to happen: NDSU SDSU UNColorado SouthernUtah Cal Poly-SLO St. Mary's (Calif) Cal-Davis The likelihood of this football-only conference forming, in my opinion, is > 75%. Some people are able to read between the lines better than others, while others believe geography was the reason. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NDSU grad Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 It's the same mushrooms that said NDSU would never be in the Big SKy, that predicted the Great West formation, and said a more than a month ago that NDSU/SDSU to the Gateway is inevitable. Not bad mushrooms. And also the same mushrooms that predicted UNO to DI, UND would never go to a Western conference, a St. Thomas/UND combo to the Horizon, Denver to the BSC. The same mushrooms that said only a little over a year ago that there was a "strong probablity" that a combo of UND/SDSU/NDSU would be accepted into the BSC, UNO was in informal talks with the Gateway Conference, Minot St. and Dakota St. would be in the NSIC, the NCC would add a few NSIC schools, and UNO to the Mid-Con. So I think after tallying up all your "predictions" you're batting about .100. Even Minnie Mendoza wouldn't be proud of that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bison Dan Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 And also the same mushrooms that predicted UNO to DI, UND would never go to a Western conference, a St. Thomas/UND combo to the Horizon, Denver to the BSC. The same mushrooms that said only a little over a year ago that there was a "strong probablity" that a combo of UND/SDSU/NDSU would be accepted into the BSC, UNO was in informal talks with the Gateway Conference, Minot St. and Dakota St. would be in the NSIC, the NCC would add a few NSIC schools, and UNO to the Mid-Con. So I think after tallying up all your "predictions" you're batting about .100. Even Minnie Mendoza wouldn't be proud of that. Oh you forgot the best one - that UND will have a conference invite & money in hand before they announce they're moving up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 Should Bison fans who said UND would never move up with Kupchella at the helm be critiquing others' predictions? Now, somebody go find the numerous posts where I predicted UND would cause the dominos to fall something like, oh, I don't know, maybe this: UND goes DI; USD (assumably) goes DI; UNO goes to MIAA; there's no conference left there to "merge". I see the remnants (SCSU, MSU, UMD, Augie) going to the NSIC. "Number of FB scholarships" is an easier conversation than "we don't have a conference at all". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NDSU grad Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 Should Bison fans who said UND would never move up with Kupchella at the helm be critiquing others' predictions? Well, since I don't think I ever said that, I feel I may be critical of any poster I want. Also, it could be argued that the SU's, or even UNC, started the domino effect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 I've always though UND would go to the Big Ten. Would we start up the "Big Ten Hockey Conference" then? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aff Posted November 16, 2006 Share Posted November 16, 2006 Aff, you really can't be that slow can you? The Big SKy and MidCon prefer teams later in their DI transition. The conferences also want to protect themselves from the 5% chance that things will not go as planned. What? You just said two posts above this one that USD will be in a conference "in two years". That wouldn't be toward the end of their transition would it? At least stay consistent in your fantasies here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aff Posted November 16, 2006 Share Posted November 16, 2006 Actually, it will happen in about two years. If you hadn't heard, they did reach a consensus, and the answer was no, no, no. (Three times). As USD's ICAC consultant said, don't move to DI unless you have a 90-95% certainty that a conference is awaiting you. Strangely enough, he says USD should move up. Wow, Aff, even you must have enough brain cells to figure that one out, considering all your USDSU / Illinois / Minnesota degrees. See, right there? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
star2city Posted November 16, 2006 Author Share Posted November 16, 2006 What? You just said two posts above this one that USD will be in a conference "in two years". That wouldn't be toward the end of their transition would it? At least stay consistent in your fantasies here. Aff: Even you can understand that there is at least an 12-18 month time delay between accepting a conference bid and actually participating in one. USD (and SIU-Edwardsville) will receive a MidCOn bid early in its transition and join the conference in the middle of its transition. Mark it down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MplsBison Posted November 16, 2006 Share Posted November 16, 2006 Mark this down: UND and USD to the mid con as travel partners. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aff Posted November 16, 2006 Share Posted November 16, 2006 Aff: Even you can understand that there is at least an 12-18 month time delay between accepting a conference bid and actually participating in one. USD (SIU-Edwardsville) will receive a MidCOn bid early in its transition and join the conference in the middle of its transition. Mark it down. In the other post you said: Aff, you really can't be that slow can you? The Big SKy and MidCon prefer teams later in their DI transition. The conferences also want to protect themselves from the 5% chance that things will not go as planned. And now you are saying that USD will get in early in their transition? PICK ONE OUT. One of these days I'm going to get you to admit your just making this crap up as you go. Obviously not here, as you've back tracked twice in two posts now, but someday soon. Write it down. Don't worry, I'll write your little note down right next to my note about Denver, UND and NDSU getting in the sky. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.