cberkas Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 minute ago, siouxforce19 said: It’s moderately important so there is room to bring in our recruits. Don’t we have one senior next year? Two Quote
OopsSioux Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Assuming Zellers continues developing his 200' game wouldn't it be just as likely to have Simpson pair with Reschny and Zellers? That's a lot of high end offensive talent on one line with Reschny a playmaker, Zellers a shooter/finisher, and Simpson a shooter/finisher. To me if those two wingers can help in the corners with Reschny that'd be pretty potent. I also think Brock Schultz might surprise some of us. I don't believe he'll be all-conference as a freshman but the young man can skate, play physical, and bring some offense. I also think Brock's impact will be determined by his role. He may be most successful working up from the 4th line however. I'm not that familiar with Ashton. No matter the case I believe UND has more questions marks on the front end than the back end. Quote
cberkas Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 2 hours ago, Dustin said: I'd say two things: 1) experienced D (Grad, Jr., Jr., the rest were younger) 2) true top line / finishers (No UND player was in the top 30 in the nation scoring) This is what they need, not more 4th liners. We should be looking at Denver, no 1st rounders, 1 2nd rounder, and they barely use the portal 1.5 guys from the portal (Salminen was committed originally to Denver). Normally Denver has 3 to 2 guys from the portal max. Quote
NoDak Hockey Nation Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 19 minutes ago, cberkas said: This is what they need, not more 4th liners. We should be looking at Denver, no 1st rounders, 1 2nd rounder, and they barely use the portal 1.5 guys from the portal (Salminen was committed originally to Denver). Normally Denver has 3 to 2 guys from the portal max. 5 upperclassmen on D too. Quote
tnt Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago I’ll reiterate what someone else said, Denver has won their titles based mostly on one position — goaltender. Denver had 26 shots in a double overtime game and 7 shots midway through the third in the Championship. Capitalizing on the chances they did have and goaltending were the key, so it wasn’t magical coaching by Carle in that situation, but he does seem to make the right moves most of the time. Who knows what happens if Miller doesn’t get injured and Carle was forced to put in Hicks. 2 Quote
OopsSioux Posted 57 minutes ago Posted 57 minutes ago 5 minutes ago, tnt said: I’ll reiterate what someone else said, Denver has won their titles based mostly on one position — goaltender. Denver had 26 shots in a double overtime game and 7 shots midway through the third in the Championship. Capitalizing on the chances they did have and goaltending were the key, so it wasn’t magical coaching by Carle in that situation, but he does seem to make the right moves most of the time. Who knows what happens if Miller doesn’t get injured and Carle was forced to put in Hicks. Agreed. Even with their success of recent I'm not sure Denver's example is the way for a lot of other programs. If Denver played Michigan ten times this year I just don't see Denver winning more than 3 Quote
tnt Posted 49 minutes ago Posted 49 minutes ago To me getting portal players or CHL players will depend on what a team’s current roster looks like. If you are really young, you might dip into the portal for guys that have already proven themselves at the college level. If you have experience you might want to go after high end CHL talent. Either way, you might only have the guys for a year or two. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.