beastandco Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, beastandco said: Rumor is Denver for Boumedienne Walking this back. A UMass reporter inferred Denver initially but it might be Ohio State as well. More likely Ohio State. Weird fit, imo. Quote
stoneySIOUX Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, hawksfan12 said: how are these players and coaches connecting pre-portal opening? Are there middlemen/agents? Or straight-up tampering? Yes Quote
brucespook Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 41 minutes ago, beastandco said: Walking this back. A UMass reporter inferred Denver initially but it might be Ohio State as well. More likely Ohio State. Weird fit, imo. all about the cash. Another me first player. Quote
AlphaMikeFoxtrot Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 43 minutes ago, beastandco said: Walking this back. A UMass reporter inferred Denver initially but it might be Ohio State as well. More likely Ohio State. Weird fit, imo. He played AAA in Columbus, likely has something to do with it. 1 Quote
siouxfaninseattle Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Let him go elsewhere. Our luck with players named Sasha is not good. 1 Quote
NoDak Hockey Nation Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 hour ago, rochsioux said: Add Carels, DuPont, and the Ruck twins and call it a day. Probably not a great strategy to have 6 of your 8 D be underclassmen 1 Quote
brianvf Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 minute ago, NoDak Hockey Nation said: Probably not a great strategy to have 6 of your 8 D be underclassmen They’d be so skilled and fun to watch though Quote
NoDak Hockey Nation Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 3 minutes ago, brianvf said: They’d be so skilled and fun to watch though Glad we want a team that is fun to watch instead of one that’s built to win a championship. Quote
tnt Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 6 minutes ago, NoDak Hockey Nation said: Probably not a great strategy to have 6 of your 8 D be underclassmen Depends on the remaining options in the portal. Would rather have a defenseman with upside than just an upperclassmen to fill a roster spot. Again, not sure the options in the portal that are out there. 2 Quote
NoDak Hockey Nation Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Just now, tnt said: Depends on the remaining options in the portal. Would rather have a defenseman with upside than just an upperclassmen to fill a roster spot. Again, not sure the options in the portal that are out there. Logan Britt is the type of player you want. Quote
tnt Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Just now, NoDak Hockey Nation said: Logan Britt is the type of player you want. Agree, but not sure who that is. Hopefully the coaches know who can add that value. Quote
The Sicatoka Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 4 minutes ago, NoDak Hockey Nation said: Logan Britt is the type of player you want. His name this year was Tyler Young. Quote
NoDak Hockey Nation Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 3 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said: His name this year was Tyler Young. Exactly. Trust your evaluations. Don’t look at point totals. You’ll find a veteran player that helps your team. Felt like the team puckered up in the first period in Vegas which can be due to lack of experience and it cost them the game. Quote
tnt Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 7 minutes ago, NoDak Hockey Nation said: Logan Britt is the type of player you want. Looks like only 6-7 upperclassmen that played much are in the portal, and Max Rud from Minnesota wouldn’t do it for me above a Rudolph or other high end guy. Quote
tnt Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 minute ago, NoDak Hockey Nation said: Exactly. Trust your evaluations. Don’t look at point totals. You’ll find a veteran player that helps your team. Felt like the team puckered up in the first period in Vegas which can be due to lack of experience and it cost them the game. But they had a ton of experience on the back end with Zmolek, Liv, and Wiebe. If our power play with those upperclassmen comes through, we win that game. Agree that experience is needed, but tournament experience is needed too, and don’t see much in the portal that would do that as most are from Lindenwood, etc. If there is a Britt there, the coaches would no doubt be exploring it. If it is a wash between talent and experience, I take talent, as guys in the NHL with the North Dakota name beside them helps with future recruiting. 1 Quote
cberkas Posted 1 hour ago Author Posted 1 hour ago 7 minutes ago, tnt said: But they had a ton of experience on the back end with Zmolek, Liv, and Wiebe. If our power play with those upperclassmen comes through, we win that game. Agree that experience is needed, but tournament experience is needed too, and don’t see much in the portal that would do that as most are from Lindenwood, etc. If there is a Britt there, the coaches would no doubt be exploring it. If it is a wash between talent and experience, I take talent, as guys in the NHL with the North Dakota name beside them helps with future recruiting. The players returning have more experience than the ones being added. Quote
cberkas Posted 56 minutes ago Author Posted 56 minutes ago 37 minutes ago, NoDak Hockey Nation said: Probably not a great strategy to have 6 of your 8 D be underclassmen Can't remember where I heard this, they were either talking about rookies or new guys in the military going on their first combat patrols, the point is the same. At some point 2 months as a rooking or after 4 combat patrols you are no longer new. You are expected to know what you are doing. So, the whole upper/underclassmen is a copout. Sophomores know what is needed and have the experience out there, the freshmen are going to figure out or not. This isn't youth hockey can't hold your hand and coddle you and that isn't happening at the next level. All 6 played NCAA last year 5 know what it takes to win. 2 Quote
skateshattrick Posted 50 minutes ago Posted 50 minutes ago 2 minutes ago, cberkas said: Can't remember where I heard this, they were either talking about rookies or new guys in the military going on their first combat patrols, the point is the same. At some point 2 months as a rooking or after 4 combat patrols you are no longer new. You are expected to know what you are doing. So, the whole upper/underclassmen is a copout. Sophomores know what is needed and have the experience out there, the freshmen are going to figure out or not. This isn't youth hockey can't hold your hand and coddle you and that isn't happening at the next level. All 6 played NCAA last year 5 know what it takes to win. Agree. The experience/upperclassmen narrative is incorrect. Denver just won with mostly freshman and sophomores, and the UND championship team in 1997 was mostly freshman and sophomores, except the defensemen who were balanced with 1 freshman, i sophomore, 2 juniors and 2 seniors. Winning with underclassmen has been the most successful formula. 2 Quote
NoDak Hockey Nation Posted 44 minutes ago Posted 44 minutes ago 6 minutes ago, skateshattrick said: Agree. The experience/upperclassmen narrative is incorrect. Denver just won with mostly freshman and sophomores, and the UND championship team in 1997 was mostly freshman and sophomores, except the defensemen who were balanced with 1 freshman, i sophomore, 2 juniors and 2 seniors. Winning with underclassmen has been the most successful formula. Yeah except their D core was 5 upperclassmen and 1 freshman… 1 Quote
skateshattrick Posted 27 minutes ago Posted 27 minutes ago 16 minutes ago, NoDak Hockey Nation said: Yeah except their D core was 5 upperclassmen and 1 freshman… UND has 2 sophomores and 2 juniors for next year--Laurilla, Verhoeff, Boser and Emery. What's your point? 1 Quote
The Sicatoka Posted 25 minutes ago Posted 25 minutes ago Pick your soon to be senior portal forward. I'll still pick sophomore Reschny. 2 2 Quote
skateshattrick Posted 24 minutes ago Posted 24 minutes ago Just now, The Sicatoka said: Pick your soon to be senior portal forward. I'll still pick sophomore Reschny. Exactly. And I'll pick Verhoeff over any senior defensemen in the portal. 1 1 Quote
Walsh Hall Posted 18 minutes ago Posted 18 minutes ago It not like these guys (from the rumors of silent commitments) haven’t played in big games. We’ll hopefully have a good chunk of players who have or will be WJ participants. They’ve been playing elite, high pressure hockey for years. 3 Quote
brianvf Posted 11 minutes ago Posted 11 minutes ago 1 hour ago, NoDak Hockey Nation said: Glad we want a team that is fun to watch instead of one that’s built to win a championship. You don’t think that team could still win a championship? Quote
burd Posted 5 minutes ago Posted 5 minutes ago What we really need is a weekly zoom conference where Jax and staff get a chance to hear our advice. I’m sure they’ve never considered a lot of what we have to say. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.