Kab Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago Don’t get a good freshman because they all transfer Quote
MoSiouxFan Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago 1 hour ago, Kab said: Don’t get a good freshman because they all transfer I'll take another Uehlmann and hope that he stays for two. Quote
SiouxFan100 Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago It’s like you want good players but not too good Quote
GoodGood Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago Holy cow people. You want the best players you can possibly get. Let’s stop being ridiculous 4 Quote
SiouxFan100 Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago Of course you want the best players you can get. Was just venting some frustration at the new reality that you can’t expect players to stick around for four years. Peace Quote
sioux24/7 Posted 21 hours ago Author Posted 21 hours ago I’m not sure there’s a perfect approach at this level, especially given UND’s situation. At the end of the day, you still want to bring in the best players you can and deal with the possibility of them transferring later. It does feel like building one-year rosters is the reality now, and I think that’s the direction UND is heading. The challenge is figuring out the right mix. Do you lean on older, experienced players from lower levels? Target P6 guys who haven’t found consistent playing time? Take shots on high school recruits who might not have been realistic options before the portal era? It’s probably some combination of all of that, and then some. 1 Quote
Kab Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago 6 minutes ago, SiouxFan100 said: Of course you want the best players you can get. Was just venting some frustration at the new reality that you can’t expect players to stick around for four years. Peace I was too, coach gets the good player and they b gone 1 Quote
ND-fan Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago I see inforum story we have three transfers in the portal Sky Volmer, Finley Ohnstad and Fletcher listed in the portal. Volmer we knew about, Ohnstad I wasn’t surprised I don’t think she bought in even though she showed promise on the offensive side of the ball it will be interesting see where she ends up and how her career progresses in the future, Fletcher hasn’t developed enough to get enough playing time and would struggle to get more playing time unless she could make off season improvement. I wonder if parent on here is one of these girls or if his daughter still on the team. I hope so or we have serious problem going forth because have all these complaints but you don’t stand up follow through end this move on in effect then you loose all credibility. Quote
UND92,96 Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago I see Darik Dissette is back in the portal, after averaging 14 points and 5 rebounds per game for Minot State this past season. I figured he would finish out his career at home in Minot. Quote
NDSU grad Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 2 minutes ago, UND92,96 said: I see Darik Dissette is back in the portal, after averaging 14 points and 5 rebounds per game for Minot State this past season. I figured he would finish out his career at home in Minot. This one really surprises me. I wonder if Taryn Hamling is also in the portal. AFAIK they’re a package deal. Quote
Baller45 Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago They are not a package deal. She is not in the portal. 1 Quote
McBuckets Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 4 hours ago, UND92,96 said: I see Darik Dissette is back in the portal, after averaging 14 points and 5 rebounds per game for Minot State this past season. I figured he would finish out his career at home in Minot. Minot is getting killed in the portal. Last summer I wanted UND to take Dissette and still would like to see him on the roster next season Quote
UNDDOM Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago Mier Panoam (Xavier) is back in the portal. I don't believe he played this past year. Quote
UND92,96 Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago Just now, UNDDOM said: Mier Panoam (Xavier) is back in the portal. I don't believe he played this past year. Medical redshirt. So he has two more years. Quote
UND92,96 Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago You really have to wonder what the impact of the proposed "5 for 5" rule change may have. It would give an additional year of eligibility to everybody in King's and Anderson's situation, i.e. played four years but never took a redshirt/medical redshirt year. Quote
MoSiouxFan Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 37 minutes ago, UND92,96 said: You really have to wonder what the impact of the proposed "5 for 5" rule change may have. It would give an additional year of eligibility to everybody in King's and Anderson's situation, i.e. played four years but never took a redshirt/medical redshirt year. From what little I've read, it sounds like the "5 for 5" rule won't go into effect immediately, thus leaving the current setup in place until it does go into effect, which would be unfortunate for King and Anderson in case they would have considered coming back. Quote
UND92,96 Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 7 minutes ago, MoSiouxFan said: From what little I've read, it sounds like the "5 for 5" rule won't go into effect immediately, thus leaving the current setup in place until it does go into effect, which would be unfortunate for King and Anderson in case they would have considered coming back. You may very well be right. But this is what Dom Izzo tweeted earlier today: Quote The amount of Summit League basketball players that are out of eligibility and entering the portal makes me think they’re being advised that the “5 for 5” rule is going to pass. Quote
MoSiouxFan Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 22 minutes ago, UND92,96 said: You may very well be right. But this is what Dom Izzo tweeted earlier today: Hope he's right, but I guess the question is "when will it pass?" Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.