Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Prospective Recruits


dagies

Recommended Posts

A couple of guys who left for a year and came back to have decent seasons were Tony Hrkac and, I believe, Teeder Wynne ( or was it Jeff McClean).

true, did hrkac leave though to work on his game or did he have a obligation to team canada that year? i forget? hrkac also had 54 points or so his freshmna year then went to team canada then came back and put on the hrkac circus show. look forward to seeing forney if it all works out!

teeder never left

http://hockeydb.com/ihdb/stats/pdisplay.php?pid=5811

yes, mclean left

http://hockeydb.com/ihdb/stats/pdisplay.php?pid=3603

fylling left

http://hockeydb.com/ihdb/stats/pdisplay.php?pid=54853

hrkac's sick numbers

http://hockeydb.com/ihdb/stats/pdisplay.php?pid=2389

Link to comment
Share on other sites

true, did hrkac leave though to work on his game or did he have a obligation to team canada that year? i forget? hrkac also had 54 points or so his freshmna year then went to team canada then came back and put on the hrkac circus show. look forward to seeing forney if it all works out!

teeder never left

http://hockeydb.com/ihdb/stats/pdisplay.php?pid=5811

yes, mclean left

http://hockeydb.com/ihdb/stats/pdisplay.php?pid=3603

fylling left

http://hockeydb.com/ihdb/stats/pdisplay.php?pid=54853

hrkac's sick numbers

http://hockeydb.com/ihdb/stats/pdisplay.php?pid=2389

Didn't Hrkac get kicked off the team after/during freshman year? Rumor was too much extracurricular activities....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, pure speculation or thinking aloud by me but ...

Forney only played in three games, last being Game 17 of a 35 game regular season, in 2007-2008. His lack of play was due to the nagging effects of surgery from injuries from the 2006-2007 season. Those are key pieces of data given that ...

The medical hardship waiver rule paraphrases to: You, due to injury, can have played not in more than 20% of your team's (regular season) games and none played can be in the second half of the season. So, 20% of 35 is seven (and 3<7) and half of 35 is 17.5, so Game 17 would still be the first half of the season (because game 18 would be "the middle" with 17 before and 17 after). Under that rule Forney didn't complete a "season of play".

Technically I believe Michael Forney is eligible to apply for a medical hardship waiver and have his "sophomore" status restored. Without that, yes, he'd be a junior.

Before someone asks, technically, this season is like a "redshirt" year that football players take. It counts as one of the five (academic) years to complete four seasons of play. A medical hardship waiver grants a sixth year to complete four seasons of play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, pure speculation or thinking aloud by me but ...

Forney only played in three games, last being Game 17 of a 35 game regular season, in 2007-2008. His lack of play was due to the nagging effects of surgery from injuries from the 2006-2007 season. Those are key pieces of data given that ...

The medical hardship waiver rule paraphrases to: You, due to injury, can have played not in more than 20% of your team's (regular season) games and none played can be in the second half of the season. So, 20% of 35 is seven (and 3<7) and half of 35 is 17.5, so Game 17 would still be the first half of the season (because game 18 would be "the middle" with 17 before and 17 after). Under that rule Forney didn't complete a "season of play".

Technically I believe Michael Forney is eligible to apply for a medical hardship waiver and have his "sophomore" status restored. Without that, yes, he'd be a junior.

Before someone asks, technically, this season is like a "redshirt" year that football players take. It counts as one of the five (academic) years to complete four seasons of play. A medical hardship waiver grants a sixth year to complete four seasons of play.

yeah but i believe a medical redshirt would have had to be granted at some point of that season and not after the fact and if that happened we would have heard about it for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

from what ive read hes a top tier d man prospect thats a possible 1st rounder in next years draft. hes he real deal and d partners with fellow sioux recruit andrew macwilliam with camrose. lock it down hak and company !!

I had the opportunity to watch Olsen and MacWilliam a few weeks ago while on a ski trip in Alberta. Olsen is the real deal! Easily the best player on the ice the night I watched them. If UND can land this kid it's going to be a huge win.

MacWilliam looks like a very nice player too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had the opportunity to watch Olsen and MacWilliam a few weeks ago while on a ski trip in Alberta. Olsen is the real deal! Easily the best player on the ice the night I watched them. If UND can land this kid it's going to be a huge win.

MacWilliam looks like a very nice player too.

olsen is a longshot. i wish we could get him. we have 7 D for next year already. maybe push gleason back a year if we can convince him but from what i heard its a longshot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah but i believe a medical redshirt would have had to be granted at some point of that season and not after the fact and if that happened we would have heard about it for sure.

I just don't find that requirement in section 14.2.4 "Hardship Waiver" of the 2008-2009 NCAA DI Manual. Asking for (quoting) "an additional year of competition" makes no sense until you have need for it. Section 14.4.2.3.3 says all you need are the medical records that say "no competition" for the rest of that season. However, I do find that the "20%" rule is now "30%" so I correct myself there. (The no games in the second half of the schedule is the same.)

Oh, and who grants that additional year: the conference grants/administers it. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just don't find that requirement in section 14.2.4 "Hardship Waiver" of the 2008-2009 NCAA DI Manual. Asking for (quoting) "an additional year of competition" makes no sense until you have need for it. Section 14.4.2.3.3 says all you need are the medical records that say "no competition" for the rest of that season. However, I do find that the "20%" rule is now "30%" so I correct myself there. (The no games in the second half of the schedule is the same.)

Oh, and who grants that additional year: the conference grants/administers it. :D

I think the WCHA likes us better then the NCAA at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so do we know if olsen is considering und as an option if he goes the college route... and who his other options might be?

Just about anywhere, I'd guess.

For these Canadians, almost certainly Cornell pops up.

Heck, why not UW? They're recruiting everyone else. :angry:

P.S. I have no idea which schools Olsen is considering, but it seems that Cornell suits stay at home D pretty well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just about anywhere, I'd guess.

For these Canadians, almost certainly Cornell pops up.

Heck, why not UW? They're recruiting everyone else. :angry:

P.S. I have no idea which schools Olsen is considering, but it seems that Cornell suits stay at home D pretty well.

Wisconsin is a strong player for Olsen. In fact, I'd like to say it's at least 50/50 he goes there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...