Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, BigGreyAnt41 said:

Head contact is a penalty regardless of whether it’s goalie interference or not.  So “in the crease” shouldn’t be an issue here if there’s actual head contact.

It should have been called a 2 on the ice...not enough for a 5, so cannot call a penalty in this case...all they can do is waive off the goal

Posted
Just now, BigGreyAnt41 said:

Head contact is a penalty regardless of whether it’s goalie interference or not.  So “in the crease” shouldn’t be an issue here if there’s actual head contact.

Fair.. who knows basically flip a coin

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...