fightingsioux4life Posted March 16 Posted March 16 WMU is not suffering a Penrose hangover like we did last year. Makes last year's debacle even harder to swallow. 1
fightingsioux4life Posted March 16 Posted March 16 Just now, 1972 said: Don't think Alex is right about denver...not sure Whether or not Denver is a lock for the NCAA Tournament, losing your first round series is not good for momentum. 1
fightingsioux4life Posted March 16 Posted March 16 Just now, cowboys5xsbs said: Thats GI Berry should challenge.
1972 Posted March 16 Posted March 16 Just now, Frozen4sioux said: Out of the crease His heels are in the blue....still ran into him
fightingsioux4life Posted March 16 Posted March 16 Just now, Wilbur said: Contact to the head? He punched him in the head.
BigGreyAnt41 Posted March 16 Posted March 16 Head contact is a penalty regardless of whether it’s goalie interference or not. So “in the crease” shouldn’t be an issue here if there’s actual head contact.
1972 Posted March 16 Posted March 16 Just now, BigGreyAnt41 said: Head contact is a penalty regardless of whether it’s goalie interference or not. So “in the crease” shouldn’t be an issue here if there’s actual head contact. It should have been called a 2 on the ice...not enough for a 5, so cannot call a penalty in this case...all they can do is waive off the goal
nodakgirl93 Posted March 16 Posted March 16 Tj had already established his position there. Wasn't like tj skated into the player 1
Frozen4sioux Posted March 16 Posted March 16 Just now, BigGreyAnt41 said: Head contact is a penalty regardless of whether it’s goalie interference or not. So “in the crease” shouldn’t be an issue here if there’s actual head contact. Fair.. who knows basically flip a coin
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now