sprig Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 6-2, Carlo from Schmaltz on 3 on 1 Period done Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I Ranger Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 4 minutes ago, sprig said: Yep, thought originally he may have a broken nose. I certainly want the US to win gold and now bronze but selfishly all I want is for Schmaltz and Boeser to come back healthy and ready for the second half! I would be alright if Wilson decided to bench the two for the third. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sprig Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 US should have the bronze, if they decide to do the work in the d end. Neither team has done the d end work in this game Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sprig Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Swedes appear to have no interest early in the third. . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sprig Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Schmaltz with signature pick from behind on the Swede dman. but stopped on the breakaway Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sprig Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Donato scores against no d, 7-2. Hope the swedes don't start cheap hits Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sprig Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Swede pp coming up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sprig Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Now 5 on 3 for 28. Time out swedes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geaux_sioux Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 It's really too bad we didn't have this jump against Russia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geaux_sioux Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Schmaltz with a nice pass. Lil chuck with a strange finish. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sprig Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 A little bu/bc congestion talk now, as opposed to the nchc bias Starman has shown . Kind of nice not having the ESPN crew involved. 8-2, kachuckkachuckka from Schmaltz Under 5 remains. Bronze it is 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sprig Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 No push from the swedes, under 2 to bronze. Not much d interest from us either. 8-3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sprig Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 8-3 final 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fightingsioux4life Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 1 minute ago, sprig said: No push from the swedes, under 2 to bronze. Not much d interest from us either. 8-3 I think the Swedes were demoralized by the loss to Finland. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fightingsioux4life Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Just now, sprig said: 8-3 final Bronze is better than nothing. Still, we need to get over the hump vs. Russia in games that really count. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sprig Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 3 minutes ago, fightingsioux4life said: I think the Swedes were demoralized by the loss to Finland. Appeared that was the case. They were bad. Much like gophers in a "meaningless third place" game Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sprig Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Good game for watching skilled players get odd man chances. Otherwise, not so much Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
runaroundsioux Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 I'm not a lip reader, but I'm pretty sure Brock Boeser was telling Austin Matthews in the medal lineup. "You really need to come to North Dakota next year." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sprig Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 1 minute ago, runaroundsioux said: I'm not a lip reader, but I'm pretty sure Brock Boeser was telling Austin Matthews in the medal lineup. "You really need to come to North Dakota next year." Forget about the nhl for awhile Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stoneySIOUX Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 1 minute ago, runaroundsioux said: I'm not a lip reader, but I'm pretty sure Brock Boeser was telling Austin Matthews in the medal lineup. "You really need to come to North Dakota next year." If that's the case, that would mean Bess thinks he'll stay, which I think he will, too. But, no chance for Matthews... next year he'll be in the NHL. Guy can only dream. Schmaltz centering Boeser and Matthews. Jost on the second line Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoreSiouxForYou Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 10 minutes ago, stoneySIOUX said: If that's the case, that would mean Bess thinks he'll stay, which I think he will, too. But, no chance for Matthews... next year he'll be in the NHL. Guy can only dream. Schmaltz centering Boeser and Matthews. Jost on the second line That would be a little bit of fun. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sprig Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 14 minutes ago, stoneySIOUX said: If that's the case, that would mean Bess thinks he'll stay, which I think he will, too. But, no chance for Matthews... next year he'll be in the NHL. Guy can only dream. Schmaltz centering Boeser and Matthews. Jost on the second line I think you can put Schmaltz in the Matthew category as well. He did nothing in this tournament that would change the Blackhawks mind in signing him. And Chicago's salary cap necessitates signing entry level players to replace some players due for bigger contracts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiouxFanatic Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Matthews signed a professional contract when he decided to play for that Swiss team, losing his NCAA eligibility. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stoneySIOUX Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 4 minutes ago, sprig said: I think you can put Schmaltz in the Matthew category as well. He did nothing in this tournament that would change the Blackhawks mind in signing him. And Chicago's salary cap necessitates signing entry level players to replace some players due for bigger contracts I think it's only different in that there is SOME chance. Matthews has zero chance. Schmaltz is more than likely gone, but there's still a chance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stoneySIOUX Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 1 minute ago, SiouxFanatic said: Matthews signed a professional contract when he decided to play for that Swiss team, losing his NCAA eligibility. I think we were all aware of that. Well, I was... but was just playing around thinking it'd be fun. Thanks for peeing on my Wheaties, though Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.