Five-HoleFrenzy Posted October 26, 2014 Posted October 26, 2014 UND did miss the net a couple of times during the game but of the 7 shots on net, 3 were registered in the last few minutes. If you didn't see it, it really was that bad. Quote
fightingsioux4life Posted October 26, 2014 Posted October 26, 2014 That is just downright pathetic. I thought stuff like this left town when Shantel Rivard did? Quote
fightingsioux4life Posted October 31, 2014 Posted October 31, 2014 Fire Idalski? Simple question. After one terrible game? No way. Getting to the top of the league will take more time, with Minnesota and Wisconsin being who they are. I think 3rd place in the WCHA this year would be appropriate. Quote
Rory Posted October 31, 2014 Posted October 31, 2014 Fire Idalski? Simple question. If he was there wouldn't be any tears shed in GF. Quote
siouxjoy Posted November 1, 2014 Posted November 1, 2014 You mean third every year? Versus last every year? Quote
sioux rube Posted November 1, 2014 Posted November 1, 2014 Girls let one slip away as Bucky tied the game in last minute. 3-3 tie. Quote
brianvf Posted November 1, 2014 Author Posted November 1, 2014 Girls let one slip away as Bucky tied the game in last minute. 3-3 tie. They at least won the shootout. Quote
sioux rube Posted November 2, 2014 Posted November 2, 2014 Fire Idalski? Simple question. Funny there isn't a fire Idalski thread like they do for Hak. Quote
Rory Posted November 3, 2014 Posted November 3, 2014 The Lammy girls leave and the interest in womens hockey basically disappears. Quote
brianvf Posted November 3, 2014 Author Posted November 3, 2014 UMN doesn't appear quite so unbeatable this year. Not exactly their best weekend against BSU. Quote
sioux rube Posted November 3, 2014 Posted November 3, 2014 UMN doesn't appear quite so unbeatable this year. Not exactly their best weekend against BSU. I knew Scanlan would be a good a fit for Bemidji. Great guy who knows how to treat his athletes and knows the game as good as anyone. Quote
Maddogg1971 Posted November 3, 2014 Posted November 3, 2014 The Lammy girls leave and the interest in womens hockey basically disappears. The Sioux womens program is either second or third every year among attendance numbers across the country. Heck I even saw one of the Lammy twins at the Saturday afternoon game. 1 Quote
gfhockey Posted November 4, 2014 Posted November 4, 2014 anyone listen to timmy and swygy this morning? my god that bashed idalski and the womens hockey in general. I know idalski is not very well liked in GF but cut him a break its womens hockey for cripes sakes. tomorrows coaches show going to be an awkard one I have a feeling... Quote
Rory Posted November 5, 2014 Posted November 5, 2014 anyone listen to timmy and swygy this morning? my god that bashed idalski and the womens hockey in general. I know idalski is not very well liked in GF but cut him a break its womens hockey for cripes sakes. tomorrows coaches show going to be an awkard one I have a feeling... Womens hockey or not they put in the time like the guys to get to where they are at. No need to belittle them. Timmy and Swygy should be ashamed of themselves. And yes Idalski is not well liked. That is well known in Grand Forks. Quote
The Sicatoka Posted November 5, 2014 Posted November 5, 2014 Hey, the women are just switching roles with the men this year: The women are digging the big, early hole and will have to scramble the rest of the way. Idalski's on the "Hakstol Plan". 1 Quote
the green team Posted November 5, 2014 Posted November 5, 2014 Womens hockey or not they put in the time like the guys to get to where they are at. No need to belittle them. Timmy and Swygy should be ashamed of themselves. And yes Idalski is not well liked. That is well known in Grand Forks. I don't think anyone can question whether the student athletes put in the time. I think the question is whether it's prudent to dedicate significant funds and resources to a program that doesn't make any money but costs a whole bunch (I'm assuming). That's the way I took the Tim and Swyg conversation. I don't think that's throwing anyone under the bus, but just asking a legitimate question. Quote
fightingsioux4life Posted November 5, 2014 Posted November 5, 2014 I don't think anyone can question whether the student athletes put in the time. I think the question is whether it's prudent to dedicate significant funds and resources to a program that doesn't make any money but costs a whole bunch (I'm assuming). That's the way I took the Tim and Swyg conversation. I don't think that's throwing anyone under the bus, but just asking a legitimate question. Two words: Title Nine And most collegiate athletic programs are money losers, not just women's hockey. If making money is a requirement, you wouldn't have more than two or three sponsored sports in NCAA athletics. Quote
gfhockey Posted November 5, 2014 Posted November 5, 2014 Let's just have women's bball men's hockey men's football girls volleyball girls cheerleading girls dancing Quote
Maddogg1971 Posted November 5, 2014 Posted November 5, 2014 10 games into the season and the sky is falling. 1 Quote
The Sicatoka Posted November 5, 2014 Posted November 5, 2014 Let's just have women's bball men's hockey men's football girls volleyball girls cheerleading girls dancing You're only about six women's and six men's sports short of the minimums to be a Division I member. (Let me help you out: Six. That's all the pointy things on one hand plus the thumb on the other. ) Quote
gfhockey Posted November 5, 2014 Posted November 5, 2014 Scanlan for president? He did sweep the gophers on the road Have we ever done that? Simple question. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.