Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, FSSD said:

I agree with this, but to UND’s credit they are continuing to invest in highly visible assets on campus to make UND a viable option:

Education: New aviation operations building and STEM Complex (Phases I and II). The university was also recently awarded R1 status.

Sports: Proposed updates to the golf course, working with the city to expand entertainment and housing options. They made the difficult decision to cut men’s and women’s tennis. The only programs that really still need facility help are the Betty Engelstad Sioux Center and soccer.

They are also in the process of creating a new campus master plan for the next round of updates.

I believe the golf thing will be doa when it’s gets to county commission 

Posted
16 minutes ago, SIOUXFAN97 said:

just do the "project" and make the tiny tiny little course a frisbee gold course then.....or

WELCOME TO UND'S SIGNATURE GOLF COURSE---------PAR 28!!!!

They tried frisbee golf there if I’m not mistaken

Posted
1 hour ago, gfhockey said:

I believe the golf thing will be doa when it’s gets to county commission 

If that’s the case, you can’t blame UND for not trying. I think they came up with a reasonable approach for the development, and the time is now with all the work already happening in that area. I’m not a taxpayer in Grand Forks, and I can respect those who vote against it. Trust me, I get the pros and cons of TIF/PILOT programs. In this case, the community gets another entertainment option. I live in the Cities, where everything seems focused on paying for housing with little to no return for the general public atleast in my community.

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, The Sicatoka said:

Unless you build one … see: NCHC.

 But your point stands.

I agree, but can you create a G6 Football Only conference?  I don't think so.

  • Like 1
Posted
48 minutes ago, FSSD said:

I agree, but can you create a G6 Football Only conference?  I don't think so.

no...that's why sioux volley was so adamant about the wac still having fbs status....i guess they (wac) didn't know there are /were whores out there willing to pay 18 milly to play in the carquest bowl....

  • Upvote 1
Posted

There is no tax base on the golf course now so why stop the. Project, in 20 years it will be taxed 

if someone doesn’t like a shorter course don’t go there 

  • Upvote 3
Posted
15 minutes ago, Kab said:

There is no tax base on the golf course now so why stop the. Project, in 20 years it will be taxed 

if someone doesn’t like a shorter course don’t go there 

go the project...just go bigger but just close the course...bo should set about to get 2 or 3 more courses added in the next 10 years or so...

Posted
1 hour ago, Kab said:

There is no tax base on the golf course now so why stop the. Project, in 20 years it will be taxed 

if someone doesn’t like a shorter course don’t go there 

The argument by the other side well we are providing all the services at a discounted rate

Posted
1 hour ago, gfhockey said:

The argument by the other side well we are providing all the services at a discounted rate

Is there a TopGolf in town?

Posted
On 8/7/2026 at 10:05 AM, jdub27 said:

More evidence articles are being pumped out with no real thought:
https://www.inforum.com/sports/bison-media-zone/mens-sports/mcfeely-protect-college-sports-act-could-be-boon-for-bison

Given that it is going to be a "boon", seems like there is some actual language in the Protect College Sports Act that isn't exactly friendly towards NDSU but was glossed over:

 

Reading the article would help.  McFooly's main point had nothing to do with money, it was regarding rules limiting realignment and super leagues.  In theory, creating stability for G6 leagues.

No clue if he's right.  Probably not.

Posted
On 8/7/2026 at 1:11 PM, southpaw said:

JMU was a great story this year. But, it's a tall order and there can only be one G6 school every year that does that. 

So, tell me who on JMU's schedule excites you? Who will NDSU get to come to Fargo for a game? Certainly, no P4 teams.  Same goes for UND if they were FBS.

Who's "excites" you on UNDs schedule?  SDSU would be it for home games in the MVFC now that NDSU is gone.  Maybe USD if they are still relevent, which at times is questionable. Illinois State or Youngstown on certain seasons, but do those foes really fire up the masses?

JMU's schedule is ironically full of former FCS teams...which tells us all we need to know about the current status of the FCS, where maybe 5 schools have a chance to win a title this year (or one, Montana State).

To each their own when it comes to excitement, I guess.

Posted
12 hours ago, SIOUXFAN97 said:

go the project...just go bigger but just close the course...bo should set about to get 2 or 3 more courses added in the next 10 years or so...

Do an executive par 3 and have the city work on another course, don’t know where the money would come from. Are the country club and kings walk hard to tat a tee time at ?

Posted
2 hours ago, Kab said:

Do an executive par 3 and have the city work on another course, don’t know where the money would come from. Are the country club and kings walk hard to tat a tee time at ?

yes...tee times can be dicey...gf/egf need 1 or 2 more (after closing lincocln and rr)

Posted
9 hours ago, Johnny Five said:

Reading the article would help.  McFooly's main point had nothing to do with money, it was regarding rules limiting realignment and super leagues.  In theory, creating stability for G6 leagues.

No clue if he's right.  Probably not.

Money seems like kind of a big deal, no?
I did read the article, but I'm not sure if Mike read the bill. A section carving out distributions NDSU won't get seems pretty relevant when you're touting something. In fact, he literally referenced it before completely ignoring the context of it:

Quote

The 171-page bill covers a wide swath. Of high interest is limiting athletes to one transfer, preventing coaches from changing jobs midseason (thanks, Lane Kiffin) and the potential of conferences pooling media rights money to make the financial playing field more equitable. All would be good changes.

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...