SIOUXFAN97 Posted Tuesday at 03:42 PM Posted Tuesday at 03:42 PM Great idea #106 UND withdraws from the MVFC and goes INDY 1AA... then schedule all road games against 1A schools...ones we can win (see ndac's rough 1a opponents for example).... then schedule all home games Pioneer League members.... example of a 12 game schedule away-UTEP=w home-Valpo=w away-Wyoming=? home-St Thomas=w away-Missouri State=w home-Drake=w away-San Jose State=w home-Butler=w away-Bowling Green=w home-Stetson=w away-Hawaii=w home-San Diego=w 10-2 9-3 or 8-4 gets you in the FCS playoffs heads would explode in Cass County....we'd be 1.5a without paying 18 milly to do so..... your welcome 1 Quote
SIOUXFAN97 Posted Tuesday at 04:12 PM Posted Tuesday at 04:12 PM 36 minutes ago, gfhockey said: Guys, I don’t wanna abandon hockey, but I’m just saying that’s what it looks like they are doing examples...bussing to omaha an example? Quote
The Sicatoka Posted Tuesday at 08:07 PM Author Posted Tuesday at 08:07 PM Miami (OH) is spending across the board. https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/miami-ohio-football-spending-nil-transfer-portal/ Quote
SIOUXFAN97 Posted Tuesday at 08:38 PM Posted Tuesday at 08:38 PM 30 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said: Miami (OH) is spending across the board. https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/miami-ohio-football-spending-nil-transfer-portal/ and this is who ndac is trying to catch...good luck cass county Quote
SIOUXFAN97 Posted Tuesday at 09:16 PM Posted Tuesday at 09:16 PM if big sky and summit/mvfc merged into the above 1.5a territory....und, usd, sdsu, um, msu, idaho, weber, and portland (with omaha and st thomas non fb) if all the fb teams adopted the same scheduling formula 1. FCS opponent-Home and Home 2. FCS opponent-always Home 3. FBS -away 4. FBS away 5. FBS away 6. conf game 1 home 7. conf game 2 away 8. conf game 3 home 9. conf game 4 away 10. conf game 5 home 11. conf game 6 away 12 conf game 7 home 6 home/6 away and the next 5/7 ex for und 1. home v yale (home and home) no payments 2. home v drake (pay them) 3. away v wyoming (pay us) 4. away v washington state (pay us) 5. away v western michigan (pay us) 6. home v usd 7. away v sdsu 8. away v montana 9. home v msu 10. away v weber 11. home v idaho 12. away v portland Quote
SIOUXFAN97 Posted Tuesday at 10:33 PM Posted Tuesday at 10:33 PM Exit fee squabble may cost Utah Valley WAC tournament play - ESPN Quote
The Sicatoka Posted 8 hours ago Author Posted 8 hours ago Noise that the MAC may be in trouble: https://csnbbs.com/thread-1026148.html They (ab)used Sac St for operating capital is how it's looking now. If the MAC needs members I hope Armacost and Chaves are listening. And if they "need" members the entry fee should be far more reasonable. 2 1 Quote
Hawkster Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 1 hour ago, The Sicatoka said: Noise that the MAC may be in trouble: https://csnbbs.com/thread-1026148.html They (ab)used Sac St for operating capital is how it's looking now. If the MAC needs members I hope Armacost and Chaves are listening. And if they "need" members the entry fee should be far more reasonable. The MAC seems about as thrilling as the prospect of Summit League football. I would never consider the MAC a step up from the MVFC. 1 Quote
UND-FB-FAN Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Hawkster said: The MAC seems about as thrilling as the prospect of Summit League football. I would never consider the MAC a step up from the MVFC. If appreciable TV revenue becomes a part of the deal, then the MAC (FBS) would be a step up from the MVFC and UND should pursue. The relationship already in place with some of the schools via hockey should be entertained. Otherwise, from an on the field perspective, I agree; the MAC is essentially the same if not worse than the MVFC. 1 Quote
The Sicatoka Posted 7 hours ago Author Posted 7 hours ago 15 minutes ago, Hawkster said: The MAC seems about as thrilling as the prospect of Summit League football. I would never consider the MAC a step up from the MVFC. 55 Toledo 71 Western Michigan 86 Ohio 97 Miami-Ohio 115 Central Michigan 135 Eastern Michigan 141 Buffalo 145 Bowling Green 149 Northern Illinois 151 Akron 165 Kent State 171 Ball State 242 Massachusetts ___________________________ 74 UNLV 81 New Mexico 84 Hawai'i 105 Air Force 127 Wyoming 138 Nevada 144 San Jose State ___________________________ UND was 95 SDSU was 99 USD was 109 Quote
Kab Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Isn’t the Mac the conference that had Tuesday through Thursday football games that is a definite no from attendance issues Quote
SiouxHawkGuy Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 6 minutes ago, Kab said: Isn’t the Mac the conference that had Tuesday through Thursday football games that is a definite no from attendance issues 1 maybe 2 home games. 7-8k? on a Tuesday night, nationally televised. 2 Quote
SIOUXFAN97 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 1 minute ago, SiouxHawkGuy said: 1 maybe 2 home games. 7-8k? on a Tuesday night, nationally televised. dollar dogs...12k! 3 Quote
The Sicatoka Posted 6 hours ago Author Posted 6 hours ago 25 minutes ago, Kab said: Isn’t the Mac the conference that had Tuesday through Thursday football games that is a definite no from attendance issues Legitimate concern, but you'd likely do one home and one road weekday game per season. And they're in November exclusively. Getting a home game Tuesday the week of deer opener would be a decent trade. https://www.forbes.com/sites/timcasey/2025/11/11/how-the-mid-american-conference-and-espn-made-maction-mid-week-football-popular/ 2 Quote
fightingsioux4life Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 27 minutes ago, Kab said: Isn’t the Mac the conference that had Tuesday through Thursday football games that is a definite no from attendance issues I think the MAC did that to get on television and not have to compete with the bigger schools and conferences for television exposure. Boise State did the same thing when they were building their program. Quote
gfhockey Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 41 minutes ago, Kab said: Isn’t the Mac the conference that had Tuesday through Thursday football games that is a definite no from attendance issues Agreed no Tuesday thru Thursday games Quote
SIOUXFAN97 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 2 minutes ago, gfhockey said: Agreed no Tuesday thru Thursday games if sdac, usd, um msu idaho tsu all go 1a without us and we're playing for jv titles against wofford, incarnate words, elon, and northwestern state of georgia....a tuesday night game against toledo will look like gold.... just saying its all relative 1 3 Quote
Kab Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 2 hours ago, SIOUXFAN97 said: if sdac, usd, um msu idaho tsu all go 1a without us and we're playing for jv titles against wofford, incarnate words, elon, and northwestern state of georgia....a tuesday night game against toledo will look like gold.... just saying its all relative So you think all those schools move on without UND Quote
Hawkster Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 3 hours ago, Kab said: Isn’t the Mac the conference that had Tuesday through Thursday football games that is a definite no from attendance issues I'm not a fan of MACtion either. Quote
nodak651 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 21 minutes ago, Hawkster said: I'm not a fan of MACtion either. I'm not a fan of any contract that prevents a team from broadcasting games locally if they aren't being broadcasts nationally. Sacrificing local fans, be it through weekday games or a decrease in exposure, in exchange for a handful of national broadcasts is never worth it, imo. The buy in from local media and games that are readily available on local TV are a large part in why the Dakota and Montana schools do so well with attendance/ticket rev/contributions. People aren't going to attend CMU or EMU from accross the country just because they saw a random FB game on TV. They might learn who they are, but so what? National TV isn't worth it if the cost hurts a mostly local fan base, IMO. Casual fans in ND cheer for NDSU because of the success, yes, but in being on statewide TV every Saturday, they were also the most accesseble and easy to watch. Nobody had to search in order to find the game. I think that's hurt Gopher hockey recently, and its nice to see they are more consistently on their local Fox station now, with fewer home games televised on Big Ten Network than other Big Ten hockey schools.. despite being terrible this year, their attendence was relatively good. Sure NDSU moving to FBS gives their program relatively more cachet, but it left a void for WDAY to fill... what if they took over the UND football broadcasts and it was UND FB that was broadcast statewide? What if the largest media company in the state directly benefited from UND's success for a change - what would the ramifications be? Getting back on topic, I think UND sticking with Saturday football and having broadcasts on statewide TV would be better than a MAC TV deal with a handful of broadcasts relegated to ESPN+, and the rest scattered about ESPU, ESPN2, and CBSSN, with a couple weekday games mixed in. Quote
SiouxHawkGuy Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 hour ago, nodak651 said: I'm not a fan of any contract that prevents a team from broadcasting games locally if they aren't being broadcasts nationally. Sacrificing local fans, be it through weekday games or a decrease in exposure, in exchange for a handful of national broadcasts is never worth it, imo. The buy in from local media and games that are readily available on local TV are a large part in why the Dakota and Montana schools do so well with attendance/ticket rev/contributions. People aren't going to attend CMU or EMU from accross the country just because they saw a random FB game on TV. They might learn who they are, but so what? National TV isn't worth it if the cost hurts a mostly local fan base, IMO. Casual fans in ND cheer for NDSU because of the success, yes, but in being on statewide TV every Saturday, they were also the most accesseble and easy to watch. Nobody had to search in order to find the game. I think that's hurt Gopher hockey recently, and its nice to see they are more consistently on their local Fox station now, with fewer home games televised on Big Ten Network than other Big Ten hockey schools.. despite being terrible this year, their attendence was relatively good. Sure NDSU moving to FBS gives their program relatively more cachet, but it left a void for WDAY to fill... what if they took over the UND football broadcasts and it was UND FB that was broadcast statewide? What if the largest media company in the state directly benefited from UND's success for a change - what would the ramifications be? Getting back on topic, I think UND sticking with Saturday football and having broadcasts on statewide TV would be better than a MAC TV deal with a handful of broadcasts relegated to ESPN+, and the rest scattered about ESPU, ESPN2, and CBSSN, with a couple weekday games mixed in. Would love to see Dom Izzo have to cheer for the Fighting Hawks Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.