FSSD

Defense looks like normal on 3 down

tech problems resolved - you may need to restart or refresh your screen

As stated below us the FF and Rewind buttons. The +10 sec and/or -10 sec buttons worked well also.

I think that I heard that UND was practicing with a multiple NG on the field in the 3-4 set to get more size on the field for teams that want to run.

watching 98 spinning circles is funny.

Well, thought the O-line played well. WR struggled to get open. UND had a nice power running game up the middle. They were limited running on the edges. But, I think that is NAU strength.

Wow what a win..

19 seconds left... 2 or 3 plays ... let go

well - D time to make a play

well, a play on offense

somebody needs to make a play

why are they not running the ball?

Well, the need a play to start the 4th Q.. as bad as the 3rd has been they are only down 1....

another 3rd down conversion

that was not roughing...

3rd down again and now a flag...

it's 3rd down... and the conversion is no problem - again.

That was a bad call... and a drive killer

hmmmm the secondary is a problem.

Goodman? Who? do you mean Hoosman

I think much of our success has been because of the play calling. Most of our plays are long handoffs (lateral passes) or quick timing throws. If we had better line play we would have two or three more explosive plays. NOTE: Not complaining. UND has been up against a couple of good defense lines. But, the next step is more time for plays to develop downfield.

run contain has been a bit of a problem.. I can think of 2 or 3 long TD runs already.

Well, before I figure out which way to cheer, are you the 1) fast and elusive type or a 2) power back with a good stiff arm? Plus, how much fight do you have in you? Are you going to just surrender and put on a good show.

I can appreciate that, but it does not change the facts that took place leading up to and during the flood - the role that NWS forecasting played in flood prevention efforts. I do believe that the NWS has gotten a free pass - unfortunately. As point of view, the houses that I was sand bagging wall at was never breached, but the house was flooded because of failures in other places. One of many reminders during my lifetime about how government doesn't always work - but they sure do love to tell you how they do.

Well, the National Weather Service and there thawed modelling didn't have anything to do with the problem at all... And they are responsible for the National Weather Service's work. It was difficult for the cities to prepare for such an enormous flood. The National Weather Service (NWS) had forecast that the river would crest at 49 feet (14.9 m),[4] which was its highest level during the 1979 flood.[5] The cities had built dikes to this level, but the river continued to rise past it. Taken by surprise, the NWS did not upgrade its forecast until April 16, the day the river reached 49 feet.