This where I am a bit fuzzy. Here is my understanding:
-Via the settlement, NCAA allowed UND to be removed from the "hostile and abusive" list after the nickname was retired
-The settlement is ambiguous and open to interpretation, but essentially keeps UND off the list
Now an honest question or two: if the decision to go with no nickname was viewed by NCAA to be in breach of contract or violation of the settlement (are those two entities different? Is breaking a settlement agreement a breach of contract?), could the NCAA just add UND back to the "hostile and abusive" list without getting the courts involved? Is it required that they sue? NCAA is a private organization, after all, with specific membership requirements.
I slept in my own bed, no Holiday Inn Express for me.