It was 2-1.
The game needs to be re-opened up to offense. I know coaches and goalies don’t want to hear it, but people pay to see goals not sweep checks and traps.
I could live with Q (save for all the eastern swooning should it happen).
UND is the only team to go down 1-0 against Q and come back to win this season.
I’ve said for years I don’t want hockey to become soccer, meaning 1-0 or 2-1 games.
Well, here’s why.
DU won on a bad bounce that was 33% of the goals in the contest.
May I offer two words for college hockey, especially my team:
On.
Net.
A million miles an hour wide is worthless.
On net opens plethora more potential outcomes.
“ … ice getting better in the Bud… “
Why aren’t the most important games of the season played on the most prepared, groomed ice, meaning ice that’s been in and tended all year.