Maybe green lenses optimistic of me, but UND “took the hit” a year ago —> 14 new faces.
About half the league, SCSU, UMD, UNO, WMU, faces that kind of turnover now.
I’d rather be in UND’s position.
Evan Trupp on line one for you …
https://hockeyphotography.photoshelter.com/gallery-image/100327-PARTIAL-NE-Regional-North-Dakota-vs-Yale/G0000FQBYHOakxwk/I0000yvi4FJSC_is/C0000f88PF79qABQ
You mean the “offense” of a shot that is tipped or blocked by the offense and never gets on net? That’s not offense. That’s defense dominating the game.
Schlossman stopped pointing out but over the last 30 years total goals per game has gone from 9 down to 5.
That’s going from 5-4 games to 3-2 games. Offense down nearly 50%. Defense is dominating the game.
That pointed out, a “bad goal” in a 9 goal world is 11% of the game. A bad goal in today’s DU/UMD game was 33% of scoring, and the game winner. That’s not talent; that’s bad luck off the boards deciding outcomes.
It was 2-1.
The game needs to be re-opened up to offense. I know coaches and goalies don’t want to hear it, but people pay to see goals not sweep checks and traps.
I could live with Q (save for all the eastern swooning should it happen).
UND is the only team to go down 1-0 against Q and come back to win this season.
I’ve said for years I don’t want hockey to become soccer, meaning 1-0 or 2-1 games.
Well, here’s why.
DU won on a bad bounce that was 33% of the goals in the contest.